Page 66 - ARNM-2-4
P. 66

Advances in Radiotherapy
            & Nuclear Medicine                                             Different approaches for the computation of BED




            Table 1. Tumor locations, target volumes, and corresponding equivalent sphere diameters (d ) for the considered stereotactic
                                                                                 es
            body radiation therapy cases
            Tumor location  Number of cases  V   (cm )  V   (cm )  V   (cm )  d   (cm)   d    (cm)  d    (cm)
                                                            3
                                                                         3
                                              3
                                        PTV,min      PTV,max      PTV,aver     es,min     es,max     es,aver
            LLL              11           16.2         55.8         33.1         3.1        4.7        3.9
            LUL               7           16.6         58.5         27.4         3.2        4.8        3.7
            RLL               6           34.5         101.7        67.4         4.0        5.8        5.0
            RML               3           10.7         21.1         14.9         2.7        3.4        3.0
            RUL              24           7.0          58.4         28.6         2.4        4.8        3.7
            Note that des denotes the diameter of a sphere with volume VPTV.
            Abbreviations: LLL: Left lower lobe; LUL: Left upper lobe; RLL: Right lower lobe; RML: Right middle lobe; RUL: Right upper lobe.

                       A                                   B
















            Figure 2. Computed D mean  and σ in (A) and (B), respectively. The presented plots indicate that the D mean  and σ of the studied DCA plans exceeded those of
            the VMAT plans.
            Abbreviations: DCA: Dynamic conformal arc; VMAT: Volumetric modulated arc therapy.

                       A                                     B















            Figure 3. BED mean  in (A) and BED nud  in (B) for the considered SBRT cases. The displayed BEDs were computed for α = 0.35 Gy  and alpha/beta ratio of
                                                                                             −1
            10 Gy. Although the DCA plans were characterized by greater values of BED mean , the corresponding VMAT plans had a larger average BED nud.
            Abbreviation: BED: Biologically effective dose; DCA: Dynamic conformal arc; SBRT: Stereotactic body radiation therapy.

            the VMAT plans, the sample mean of  BED  was only    According to the approach realized in Velocity
                                                nud
            2% and 5% smaller than that of BED mean  for α = 0.15 Gy    and RaySearch, the DCA plans should be preferred in
                                                         −1
            and α = 0.35 Gy , respectively (Figure 3 and Table 2). The   terms of their higher  BED mean  than the VMAT plans.
                         −1
            observed smaller difference between BED mean  and BED    Conversely, if  the  BED  is  computed  by averaging  the
                                                        nud
            for the studied VMAT plans was due to the smaller variance   survival probabilities  in different voxels,  the resulting
            of the target dose compared with that in the DCA plans.  BED  for the studied VMAT plans was on average higher
                                                                   nud
                                                               than that for the corresponding DCA plans (for α = 0.35
            4.4. Clinical implications of the results          Gy ). Fourteen DCA plans (27% of all plans) had BED
                                                                 −1
                                                                                                           nud
            The clinical ramifications of this work can be elucidated   < 100 Gy. Conversely, all the studied VMAT plans were
            with the help of Figure 3 and Table 2.             characterized by BED nud  ≥100 Gy. The differences between
            Volume 2 Issue 4 (2024)                         6                              doi: 10.36922/arnm.4826
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71