Page 59 - ARNM-3-1
P. 59

Advances in Radiotherapy
            & Nuclear Medicine                                                   The novel index and osteoradionecrosis




            Table 3. Distribution of variables according to risk groups and results of their relationship
            Characteristics                    All patients   Low‑risk group   Intermediate‑risk   High‑risk group   P‑value
                                                (n=220)       (n=94)       group (n=94)      (n=32)
            Continued smoking, n (%)
             Yes                                47 (21.4)     18 (19.14)     21 (22.34)      8 (0.25)    0.22
             No                                173 (78.6)     76 (80.86)     73 (77.66)     24 (0.75)
            Continued alcohol consumption, n (%)
             Yes                               64 (29.01)     27 (28.72)     28 (29.80)     9 (28.13)    0.19
             No                                156 (70.99)    67 (71.28)     66 (70.2)      23 (71.87)
            Concurrent chemotherapy cycles, n (%)
             1                                  55 (0.25)     16 (0.25)      24 (25.53)     15 (46.9)   0.008
             2 – 3                             165 (0.75)     78 (0.75)      70 (74.47)     17 (53.1)
            Adjuvant chemotherapy cycles
             0                                 76 (34.54)     23 (24.5)      33 (35.1)      20 (62.5)   0.006
             1 – 2                             144 (65.46)    71 (75.5)      61 (64.9)      12 (37.5)
            Mean mandibular dose, Gy (range)  41.6 (18.4 – 74.8)  41.9 (18.4 – 74.2)  41.2 (19.3 – 73.7)  41.8 (19.1 – 74.8)  0.87
            Mean mandibular dose group, n (%)
             <56.4                             163 (74.1)     70 (74.5)      69 (73.4)      24 (0.75)    0.57
             ≥56.4                              57 (25.9)     24 (25.5)      25 (26.6)       8 (0.25)
            Median post-C-CRT extracted teeth, n (range)  1 (0 – 5)  1 (0 – 1)  1 (0 – 5)   2 (0 – 5)    0.00*
            Median C-CRT to ORN interval, mo. (range)  19 (12 – 24)  19 (19 – 19)  19 (15 – 24)  19 (12 – 24)  0.85
            Post-CCRT TE, n (%)
             Absent                             38 (17.3)     20 (21.3)      16 (17.0)       2 (6.3)     0.06
             Present                           182 (82.7)     74 (78.7)      78 (83.0)      30 (93.7)
            ORNJ, n (%)
             Absent                            199 (90.5)     93 (98.9)      88 (93.6)      18 (56.3)   <0.001
             Present                            21 (9.5)       1 (1.1)        6 (6.4)       14 (43.8)
            Abbreviations: C-CRT: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy; Gy: Gray; ORNJ: Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws.

            In a recent study by our group, PIV levels were associated   pre-RT TEs may be further aggravated by the severity of
            with post-C-CRT ORNJ rates.  Herein, in line with our   surgical damage to both soft tissues and bone. Multiple
                                     29
            previous findings, we have corroborated that the incidence   pretreatment TEs, which indicate poor oral health and
            of ORNJ is significantly high in the group with PIV ≥   significant trauma to the mandible, are clearly linked to a
            833 compared with the group with PIV < 833 (25.8% vs.   substantially higher risk of ORNJ. This heightened risk is
            2.6%, P < 0.001). This outcome indicates that PIV can be   likely due to decreased tissue blood flow and oxygenation
            regarded as a pertinent biomarker for assessing the ORNJ   in the severely injured mandible and tooth sockets after RT
            risk in patients with LA-NPC who have received C-CRT.  or C-CRT. In this respect, pre-C-CRT TE ≥ 4 was observed
                                                               in 100% of the high-risk group, 64.9% of the intermediate-
              A study demonstrated that TE functions as a catalyst
            in increasing ORNJ risk. Nonetheless, a significant   risk group, and 0% of the low-risk group. This finding
            debate exists concerning the optimal timing for TE   highlights a significantly greater prevalence of suboptimal
            enactment. 40,41  Consistent with the results of our previous   oral health status among the high- and intermediate-risk
            and present studies, some researchers contend that   groups relative to the low-risk group (P < 0.001). Although
            TEs lead to a higher ORNJ risk due to radiation-related   further investigations are warranted, these results imply
            consequences, regardless of their timing. For example,   that in addition to increased trauma due to dental
            Beech et al. found that pre-RT TEs, either alone or followed   extractions, prolonged periods of compromised oral health
            by post-RT TEs, increased the ORNJ risk.  Confirming   and associated chronic local and systemic inflammation
                                               28
            the role of pretreatment TEs in ORNJ development, a   may have contributed to the elevated incidence of ORNJ
            recent meta-analysis by Jiang  et al. elucidated a 4.16%   within these patient subgroups.
            risk of ORNJ associated with pre-RT TEs,  a figure that   The  most  prominent  finding  of  this  study  was
                                              42
            only  marginally  diverges  from  the  6.4%  incidence  of   the creation of a new index by integrating previously
            ORNJ observed within the intermediate-risk cohort in   established pretreatment PIV ≥ 833 and TE ≥ 4 to predict
            the present study. The increased risk of ORNJ following   ORNJ rates after C-CRT in patients with LA-NPC, namely,


            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2025)                         51                             doi: 10.36922/arnm.5799
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64