Page 21 - ARNM-3-2
P. 21

Advances in Radiotherapy
            & Nuclear Medicine                                             Role of PET/CT in exploring tumor heterogeneity



               Transl Med. 2021;9:16.                             doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01186-8
               doi: 10.21037/atm-21-1948                       15.  Zhao S, Kuge Y, Mochizuki T, et al. Biologic correlates of
            5.   Jönsson H, Ahlström H, Kullberg, J. Spatial mapping of   intratumoral heterogeneity in 18 F-FDG distribution
               tumor heterogeneity in whole-body PET-CT: A feasibility   with  regional  expression  of glucose  transporters and
               study. Biomed Eng Online. 2023;22:110.             hexokinase-II in the experimental tumor.  J  Nucl  Med.
                                                                  2005;46:675-682.
               doi: 10.1186/s12938-023-01173-0
                                                               16.  Derlon  JM,  Chapon  F,  Noel  MH,  et al.  Non-invasive
            6.   Hughes NM, Mou T, O’Regan KN, et al. Tumor heterogeneity   grading of oligodendrogliomas: Correlation between in vivo
               measurement using [18F] FDG PET/CT shows prognostic   metabolic pattern and histopathology.  Eur J Nucl Med.
               value in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.  Eur J   2000;27:778-787.
               Hybrid Imaging. 2018;2:25.
                                                                  doi: 10.1007/s002590000260
               doi: 10.1186/s41824-018-0043-1
                                                               17.  Henriksson E, Kjellen E, Wahlberg P, et al. 2-Deoxy-2-[ 18
            7.   McQuerry JA, Chang JT, Bowtell DDL, Cohen A, Bild AH.   F] fluoro-D-glucose uptake and correlation to intratumoral
               Mechanisms and clinical implications of tumor heterogeneity   heterogeneity. Anticancer Res. 2007;27:2155-2159.
               and convergence on recurrent phenotypes. J Mol Med (Berl).
               2017;95:1167-1178.                              18.  Van Baardwijk A, Bosmans G, Van Suylen RJ,  et al.
                                                                  Correlation of  intra-tumour  heterogeneity  on  18  F-FDG
               doi: 10.1007/s00109-017-1587-4                     PET with pathologic features in nonsmall cell lung cancer:
            8.   Li C, Wang S, Li C, Yin Y, et al. Improved risk stratification   A feasibility study. Radiother Oncol. 2008;87:55-58.
               by PET-based intratumor heterogeneity in children with      doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.02.002
               high-risk neuroblastoma. Front Oncol. 2022;12:896593.
                                                               19.  Eary JF, O’Sullivan F, O’Sullivan J, Conrad EU. Spatial
               doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.896593                      heterogeneity in sarcoma 18F-FDG uptake as a predictor of
            9.   Marusyk A, Polyak K. Tumor heterogeneity: Causes and   patient outcome. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1973-1979.
               consequences. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1805:105-117.     doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.053397
               doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2009.11.002                20.  Kidd EA, Grigsby PW. Intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity
            10.  Morrissy  AS,  Cavalli  FMG,  Remke  M,  et  al.  Spatial   of cervical cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:5236-5241.
               heterogeneity in medulloblastoma.  Nat Genet. 2017;49:      doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5252
               780-788.
                                                               21.  Tixier F, Le Rest CC, Hatt M, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity
               doi: 10.1038/ng.3838                               characterized by textural features on baseline 18F-FDG PET
            11.  Savas P, Teo ZL, Lefevre C, et al. The subclonal architecture   images predicts response to concomitant radiochemotherapy
               of metastatic breast cancer: Results from a prospective   in esophageal cancer. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:369-378.
               community-based rapid autopsy program “CASCADE”.      doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.082404
               PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1002204.
                                                               22.  Schinagl  DA,  Kaanders  JH,  Oyen  WJ.  From  anatomical
               doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002204. Erratum in: PLoS Med.   to biological target volumes: The role of PET in radiation
               2017;14(4):e1002302.                               treatment planning. Cancer Imaging. 2006;6:107-116.
               doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002302                  doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2006.9017
            12.  Dagogo-Jack I, Shaw AT. Tumour heterogeneity and   23.  Newbold KL, Partridge M, Cook G, et al. Evaluation of the
               resistance to cancer therapies.  Nat Rev Clin Oncol.   role of 18FDG-PET/CT in radiotherapy target definition
               2018;15:81-94.
                                                                  in patients with head and neck cancer.  Acta Oncol.
               doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.166                    2008;47:1229-1236.
            13.  Bailly  C,  Bodet-Milin  C,  Bourgeois  M,  et al.  Exploring      doi: 10.1080/02841860802256483.
               tumor heterogeneity using PET imaging: The big picture.   24.  Lopci E, Nanni C, Castellucci P, et al. Imaging with non-
               Cancers (Basel). 2019;11:1282.                     FDG PET tracers: Outlook for current clinical applications.
               doi: 10.3390/cancers11091282                       Insights Imaging. 2010;1:373-385.
            14.  Anan N, Zainon R, Tamal M. A  review on advances in      doi: 10.1007/s13244-010-0040-9
               18 F-FDG PET/CT radiomics standardization and application   25.  Jadvar H, Delgado-Bolton R, Nadel H,  et al. Appropriate
               in lung disease management. Insights Imaging. 2022;13:22.  use criteria for  F-FDG PET/CT in restaging and treatment
                                                                             18
               doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01153-9.  Erratum in:  Insights   response assessment of malignant disease.  J  Nucl Med.
               Imaging. 2022;13(1):32.                            2017;58:2026-3724.


            Volume 3 Issue 2 (2025)                         13                        doi: 10.36922/ARNM025040005
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26