Page 24 - BH-2-3
P. 24

Brain & Heart





                                        REVIEW ARTICLE
                                        Digital tools and scores for estimating the risk of

                                        stroke and bleeding in atrial fibrillation



                                        Kyra Dingle 1†  , Jeffrey E. Jones 1†  , Dhruvil Ashishkumar Patel 2  ,
                                                          3
                                        Camila Trejo-Paredes , Lynda E. Rosenfeld 3  , and Jiun-Ruey Hu *
                                                                                               3,4
                                        1 School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America
                                        2 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United
                                        States of America
                                        3 Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine,
                                        New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
                                        4 Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA,
                                        United States of America




                                        Abstract
                                        Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a significant risk factor for cardioembolic stroke; however,
                                        therapeutic anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with AF also increases
                                        the risk of bleeding. Over the past two decades, extensive efforts have focused on
                                        refining patient stratification into risk categories to guide the selection of anticoagulant
                                        therapy. Various scores have been developed to estimate stroke risk in patients with
                                        AF, including CHADS , Framingham, CHA DS -VASc, ATRIA, ABC, GARFIELD-AF, and
                                                                          2
                                                                             2
                                                         2
            † These authors contributed equally   IMRS-VASc, with CHA DS -VASc being the most widely utilized. Similarly, scores such
            to this work.                                2  2
                                        as HEMORR HAGES, HAS-BLED, ORBIT, ATRIA, GARFIELD-AF, and the newly introduced
                                                 2
            *Corresponding author:      DOAC are utilized to estimate bleeding risk, with HAS-BLED being predominant. In
            Jiun-Ruey Hu
            (jiun-ruey.hu@yale.edu)     recent years, numerous digital tools have been developed to assist physicians and
                                        patients in visualizing the risk of stroke and bleeding in an interactive manner, to
            Citation: Dingle K, Jones JE,   strengthen the use of evidence-based medicine, and to facilitate shared decision-
            Patel DA, Trejo-Paredes C,
            Rosenfeld LE, Hu JR. Digital   making. These tools include the American College of Cardiology’s AnticoagEvaluator
            tools and scores for estimating   app, Mayo Clinic Anticoagulation Choice Decision Aid, Stroke Prevention in Atrial
            the risk of stroke and bleeding in   Fibrillation Risk  Tool (SPARCtool), GARFIELD-AF Risk Calculator, and CardioSmart
            atrial fibrillation. Brain & Heart.
            2024;2(3):3068.             Atrial Fibrillation and Bleeding Risk Calculator. This review explores the evolution of
            doi: 10.36922/bh.3068       these risk scores, evaluating their merits and drawbacks while highlighting common
            Received: March 1, 2024     variables across multiple risk scores. In addition, it describes the landscape of novel
                                        digital tools designed for decision-making, offering insights from the perspective of
            Accepted: May 29, 2024
                                        physician users.
            Published Online: August 7, 2024
            Copyright: © 2024 Author(s).   Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Anticoagulation; Bleeding; Stroke; Digital tools; Risk score
            This is an Open-Access article
            distributed under the terms of the
            Creative Commons Attribution
            License, permitting distribution,
            and reproduction in any medium,   1. Introduction
            provided the original work is
            properly cited.             Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in adults, with an estimated
                                                                       1
            Publisher’s Note: AccScience   global prevalence of 50 million in 2020.  In the United States (US) alone, the prevalence
            Publishing remains neutral with   of AF is projected to increase to 12.1 million in 2030 from 5.2 million in 2010, and
            regard to jurisdictional claims in
            published maps and institutional   the incidence of AF is projected to increase to 2.6 million in 2030 from 1.2 million in
                                            2,3
            affiliations.               2010.  AF not only contributes significantly to mortality but also to morbidity related to
            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2024)                         1                                doi: 10.36922/bh.3068
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29