Page 21 - BH-3-1

Brain & Heart TAVR in low gradient aortic stenosis

5. Clavel MA, Magne J, Pibarot P. Low-gradient aortic stenosis. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003
Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2645-2657.
15. Sharma N, Sachedina AK, Kumar S. Low-flow, low-gradient
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw096 severe aortic stenosis: A review. Heart Int. 2023;17:8-12.
6. Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Kienzle RP, doi: 10.17925/HI.2023.17.1.8
Neumann FJ, Jander N. Inconsistencies of echocardiographic 16. Telmesani A, Chang SM, Faza N, Little SH, Shah DJ.
criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J. Role of multimodality imaging in transcatheter
2008;29:1043-1048.
structural interventions. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm543 2023;19:91-104.
7. Ross J Jr., Braunwald E. Aortic stenosis. Circulation. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1209
1968;38:61-67.
17. Hahn RT, Khalique O, Williams MR, et al. Predicting
doi: 10.1161/01.cir.38.1s5.v-61 paravalvular regurgitation following transcatheter valve
8. Carabello BA. The symptoms of aortic stenosis: A step closer replacement: Utility of a novel method for three-dimensional
to understanding their cause. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. echocardiographic measurements of the aortic annulus.
2013;6:147-149. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26:1043-1052.
doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.07.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.12.002
18. Narula J, Chandrashekhar Y, Ahmadi A, et al. SCCT
9. Lancellotti P, Magne J, Donal E, et al. Clinical outcome in
asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: Insights from the new 2021 expert consensus document on coronary computed
proposed aortic stenosis grading classification. J Am Coll tomographic angiography: A report of the society of
Cardiol. 2012;59:235-243. cardiovascular computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput
Tomogr. 2021;15:192-217.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.072
doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.11.001
10. Ueyama H, Kuno T, Harrington M, et al. Impact of surgical
and transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low-gradient 19. Clavel MA, Pibarot P, Messika-Zeitoun D, et al. Impact of
aortic stenosis: A meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. aortic valve calcification, as measured by MDCT, on survival
2021;14:1481-1492. in patients with aortic stenosis: Results of an international
registry study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1202-1213.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.04.038
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.066
11. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/
AHA guideline for the management of patients with 20. Bohbot Y, Renard C, Manrique A, et al. Usefulness of
valvular heart disease: Executive summary: A report of the cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in aortic stenosis. Circ
American college of cardiology/American heart association Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:e010356.
joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.010356
2021;143:e35-e71.
21. Kammerlander AA, Wiesinger M, Duca F, et al. Diagnostic
doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000932 and prognostic utility of cardiac magnetic resonance
12. Kjonas D, Dahle G, Schirmer H, et al. Risk scores for imaging in aortic regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging.
prediction of 30-day mortality after transcatheter aortic 2019;12:1474-1483.
valve implantation: Results from a two-center study in doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.08.036
Norway. Health Sci Rep. 2021;4:e283.
22. Pawade T, Clavel MA, Tribouilloy C, et al. Computed
doi: 10.1002/hsr2.283 tomography aortic valve calcium scoring in patients with
13. Clavel MA, Messika-Zeitoun D, Pibarot P, et al. The aortic stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:e007146.
complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007146
disease grading: New insights from combined Doppler
echocardiographic and computed tomographic study. J Am 23. Kottam A, Hanneman K, Schenone A, et al. State-of-the-
Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:2329-38. art imaging of infiltrative cardiomyopathies: A scientific
statement from the american heart association. Circ
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1621 Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;16:e000081.
14. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations doi: 10.1161/HCI.0000000000000081
for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography
in adults: An update from the American society of 24. Kawel-Boehm N, Maceira A, Valsangiacomo-Buechel ER,
echocardiography and the European association et al. Normal values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance
of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. in adults and children. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015;17:29.
2015;28:1-39.e14. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0111-7

Volume 3 Issue 1 (2025) 15 doi: 10.36922/bh.4017