Page 25 - BH-3-1

Brain & Heart TAVR in low gradient aortic stenosis

doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001094 low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic valve stenosis according
to the assigned treatment modality. JACC Cardiovasc Interv.
84. Kugelman N, Jaffe R, Aronson D, et al. Outcome of patients
with low-gradient aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter 2015;8:704-717.
or surgical aortic valve replacement. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.11.020
2020;21:257-262.
90. Galli E, Le Ven F, Coisne A, et al. Rational and design of
doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.05.002 the ROTAS study: A randomized study for the optimal
treatment of symptomatic patients with low-gradient severe
85. Annabi MS, Cote N, Dahou A, et al. Comparison of early
surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus aortic valve stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection
conservative management in low-flow, low-gradient aortic fraction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;22:229-235.
stenosis using inverse probability of treatment weighting: doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa036
Results from the TOPAS prospective observational cohort 91. Zusman O, Pressman GS, Banai S, Finkelstein A, Topilsky Y.
study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e017870.
Intervention versus observation in symptomatic patients
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017870 with normal flow low gradient severe aortic stenosis. JACC
Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:1225-1232.
86. Chetcuti SJ, Deeb GM, Popma JJ, et al. Self-expanding
transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.07.020
low-gradient aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 92. Khalique OK, Hahn RT, Gada H, et al. Quantity and location
2019;12:67-80.
of aortic valve complex calcification predicts severity and
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.028 location of paravalvular regurgitation and frequency of
post-dilation after balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic
87. Ben-Dor I, Maluenda G, Iyasu GD, et al. Comparison
of outcome of higher versus lower transvalvular valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:885-894.
gradients in patients with severe aortic stenosis and low doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.03.007
(<40%) left ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol. 93. Mauri V, Kim WK, Abumayyaleh M, et al. Short-term
2012;109:1031-1037.
outcome and hemodynamic performance of next-
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.041 generation self-expanding versus balloon-expandable
transcatheter aortic valves in patients with small aortic
88. Takagi H, Hari Y, Kawai N, Ando T, ALICE (All-Literature
Investigation of Cardiovascular Evidence) Group. Meta- annulus: A multicenter propensity-matched comparison.
analysis and meta-regression of transcatheter aortic valve Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:e005013.
implantation for pure native aortic regurgitation. Heart doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005013
Lung Circ. 2020;29:729-741.
94. Waksman R, Rogers T, Torguson R, et al. Transcatheter aortic
doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.04.012 valve replacement in low-risk patients with symptomatic
severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:2095-2105.
89. O’Sullivan CJ, Englberger L, Hosek N, et al. Clinical
outcomes and revascularization strategies in patients with doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1033

Volume 3 Issue 1 (2025) 19 doi: 10.36922/bh.4017