Page 107 - DP-2-2
P. 107

Design+                                                                 Modern interpretations of probability



            What was done in this direction was too cumbersome and   Infinite-valued logic for two variables whose
            inconvenient. The described ideas have not found wide direct   probabilities of truth are a and b is introduced by formal
            application in practical activity either. At the same time, we   statements: the true value of a variable is characterized by
            note that the work in this direction was not in vain. They   the value being on the interval of real numbers from 0 to
            contributed to realizing the connection between logic and   1, negation is defined as 1-a, conjunction as min (a, b), and
            probability, which led to the formation of new, practically   disjunction as max (a, b).
            useful scientific directions. Today, the scientific community   The introduced rules made it possible to describe
            perceives the degree of reasonable belief not as the actual   processes and phenomena as functional dependencies
            belief of  the  subject  in  the corresponding  statement,  but   between the factors acting on the object (function
            as a logical relation between statements. In this case, the   arguments) and reactions of this object (function values),
            measure of reasonable belief is transformed into the degree of   carry out identical transformations of these dependencies,
            confirmation, which is the foundation of the modern theory   and  form  appropriate  solutions.  Multivalued  (infinite-
            of inductive logic.                                valued) logic with a certain degree of conventionality can
            7. Multivalued logic                               be considered a forerunner of fuzzy logic.
            Classical logic, by definition, cannot operate with concepts   8. Probability and infinite-valued logic
            that are delineated concretely, ambiguously, because all   At first sight, the theory of probabilities appears to be
            statements (logical variables and hypotheses) in the formal   analogous (or at least very close in content) to infinite-valued
            systems of this logic can have only two mutually exclusive   logic, in the framework of which the truth of realization of
            states: “true” with truth value “1” or “false” with truth   some event is characterized by the category of possibility,
            value “0.”                                         that is, it is established with some probability, which takes
              The principle of ambiguity (the law of the excluded   the value from 0 to 1 (zero truth means complete falsehood,
            third) determines the uncompromising discreteness   one truth means complete certainty). The probability of
            of the representation of analyzed phenomena, leaving   non-realization of some event corresponds to negation,
            no room for any uncertainty, modal, and probabilistic   while the probability of simultaneous realization of two
            assessments of these phenomena. However, in many cases,   events corresponds to conjunction.
            the  essence  of  any  statement,  conclusion,  or  hypothesis   However, there is a fundamental difference between
            can be perceived with more or less skepticism. After all,   probability theory and infinite-valued (and multi-valued)
            the  statement  “not  full”  in  many  cases  does  not  mean   logic. In logic, the true value of any function is completely
            “empty,” just as the statement “not empty” may not fully   determined by the true value of its arguments,  whereas
            characterize an object as “full.” Binary assessment of truth   in probability theory, the probability of a complex event
            in such situations imposes significant limitations on the   (integrated from component events) depends not only on
            realization of relevant studies and conclusions. It begins   the probabilities of the component events but also on their
            to hamper and restrain the activity of both the creators   mutual  dependence,  which  is  determined  through  the
            of scientific theories and the engineering community.   corresponding conditional probabilities. This is manifested,
            The need to reflect the uncertainty, and incompleteness   in particular, in the fact that in probability theory, the
            of the concepts of “truth” and “false” in the process of   equivalent of the “law of the excluded third” is fulfilled. In
            solving professional tasks of specialists from various fields   probability theory, “some event is realized or not realized”
            of knowledge led to the search for, and eventually to the   is always equal to one (there is no third option), whereas,
            emergence of appropriate mathematical artifacts that   in infinite-valued logic, the law of the excluded third is not
            significantly expanded the boundaries of bivalent logic,   fulfilled. Similarly, in probability theory, the equivalent of
            turning it into multivalued logic as a kind of formal logic   the “law of contradiction” is fulfilled: the probability that
            that allows the existence of more than two values of a   “some event is simultaneously realized and not realized” is
            logical variable. 18,19                            always equal to zero, whereas, in infinite-valued logic, the
              One of the first attempts to move beyond binary   law of contradiction is not fulfilled.
            logic was made in 1920 by the Polish philosopher Jan   At the same time, an overly critical analysis allows us
            Lukasiewicz, who introduced a three-valued logic. Within   to establish the existence of some connection between the
            this framework, truth values were expanded beyond the   truth values of the categories of infinite-valued logic and
            traditional “true” and “false” to include an intermediate   the  probabilities  of  these  categories  (given  the  classical
            value: “possible.” These values corresponded to the grades   interpretation of the notion of probability). This connection
            “1 (true),” “0.5 (possible),” and “0 (false).”     is  manifested  in  the  above  provisions,  which  formally


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                         12                               doi: 10.36922/dp.6387
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112