Page 94 - DP-2-3
P. 94

Design+                                         Evaluation of recreational suitability of urban waterfront green spaces




            Table A1. (Continued)
            Objective layer      Factor layer      Primary indicator   Classify and code  Secondary indicator  Score
                                                                            32      Comfort level
                                                                            33      Distribution
                                                   Recreational facilities  34      Recreational facility diversity
                                                                            35      Recreational facility fun
                                                                            36      Facility management
                                                                            37      Facility safety
                                                                            38      Safety of water-friendly
                                                                                    facilities
                                                                            39      The fun of water-friendly
                                                                                    facilities
                                                                            40      Waterfront facility rationality
                                 Recreational experience  Recreational space  41    Space diversity
                                                                            42      Space comfort
                                                                            43      Space safety
                                                                            44      Waterfront accessibility
                                                   Recreational activities  45      Activity diversity
                                                                            46      Participation level
                                                                            47      The appeal of recreational
                                                                                    activities
                                                                            48      Waterfront entertainment
                                 Location/transportation  Location          49      Geographic location
                                                                            50      Visitor proximity
                                                   Transportation           51      Internal transportation
                                                                            52      External transportation

            1.  Do you think the above indicators are reasonable?
               A.  Very reasonable
               B.  Reasonable
               C.  Basically reasonable
               D.  Unreasonable
               E.  Very unreasonable
            2.  In your opinion, the indicators that need to be added are:
               A.  The indicators that need to be deleted are:
               B.  The indicators that need to be modified are:

              This concludes the questionnaire. To prevent any omissions, please check each question again to see if you have missed
            any. Thank you! I wish you a smooth work and good health!
            Appendix 2. Questionnaire for the evaluation of the recreational suitability of Linyi Calligraphy Square
              Dear visitors:
              Hello! I am a student majoring in landscape architecture at Linyi University. My supervisor is Dr. Zhuang. I am
            currently conducting research on the recreational suitability of the Calligraphy Square in Linyi to better understand
            everyone’s attitudes and thoughts toward the Calligraphy Square in Linyi and to propose feasible construction and
            countermeasures for the recreational suitability of the Calligraphy Square. We hereby raise the following questions to
            you. We hope you can cooperate actively. Thank you for your cooperation! If you have any questions, please contact:
            1786449XXXX.




            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2025)                         19                           doi: 10.36922/DP025110020
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99