Page 92 - DP-2-3
P. 92
Design+ Evaluation of recreational suitability of urban waterfront green spaces
2017;49(1):44-46. 46. Guo H, Guo S. Evaluation of plant landscape quality of
urban wetland park based on AHP-fuzzy comprehensive
37. Shen X. Study on Suitability Evaluation of Urban Waterfront
Green Space Recreation. Master. China: Zhejiang A and F evaluation-a case study of urban wetland park in Longyan
University; 2018. City. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(20):13159.
38. Liu, Ye Z, Fan L, Gui Y. Research on satisfaction evaluation of 47. Fang Y, Chen H. Recreation evaluation of ma anshan
urban waterfront public space based on AHP-IPA method. forest park based on AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
Urban Architec. 2024;9:73-79. method. Human Agric Sci. 2020;4:47-50.
doi: 10.19892/j.cnki.csjz.2024.09.16 doi: 10.16498/j.cnki.hnnykx.2020.004.013
39. Sharma V, Ghosh S, Dey S, Singh S. Modelling PM2.5 48. Zhang R. Research on Comprehensive Park Tourist
for data-scarce zone of northwestern india using multi Satisfaction Evaluation Based on LDA and Fuzzy
linear regression and random forest approaches. Ann GIS. Comprehensive Evaluation Method. China: Beijing Forestry
2023;29(3):415-427. University; 2022.
doi: 10.1080/19475683.2023.2183523 49. Guo L, Luo W, Gong X, Zhang D. Evaluation of the
recreational suitability of the science popularization and
40. Gahalod NS, Rajeev K, Pant PK, Binjola S, Yadav RL, education base in the giant panda national park. Sichuan For
Meena RL. Spatial assessment of flood vulnerability and Sci Technol. 2024;2:127-134.
waterlogging extent in agricultural lands using RS-GIS and
AHP technique-a case study of Patan district Gujarat, India. 50. Li D, Tie W, Qing J. Research on the risk of stampede
Environ Monit Assess. 2024;196(4):338. accidents in crowded places based on AHP- fuzzy
comprehensive evaluation method. Indus Safe Environ Prot.
doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12482-9 2025;5:24-29.
41. Chi YL, Mak HW. From comparative and statistical 51. Wang G, Yue L, Chuanzhong L, et al. Research on the
assessments of liveability and health conditions of districts in green evaluation system of maintenance bases based on
hong kong towards future city development. Sustainability, AHP- fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Technol
2021;13(16):8781. Indus. 2025;8:31-38.
doi: 10.3390/su13168781 52. Luo J, Yuan Z, Xu L, Xu W. Assessing the impact of waterfront
42. Wei P. Research on Route Selection and Optimization of environments on public well-being through digital twin
Recreational Greenway Network in Wuzhou City Center. technology. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens.
Master. China: Guilin University of Technology; 2024. 2025;18:4536-4553.
43. Sun F. Design of Urban Waterfront Green Space in Semi- 53. Cong L. Application of green building thermal energy
humid Areas from the Perspective of Elastic Water Landscape. conservation based on light imaging equipment in
China: Beijing Forestry University; 2022. landscape optimization of waterfront space. Therm Sci Eng
Prog. 2024;54:102787.
44. Zhang Q, Qiu Y, Xu D. Evaluation of ecological recreation
suitability of baishanzu national park based on GIS. J Lishui doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102787
Univ. 2024;46(4):72-82.
54. Wang Y, Liu X, Xie R, et al. Thermal comfort and urban
45. Xu X, Xue J. Aesthetic evaluation for plant landscape microclimate response: A new thermal environment
of wetland park based on AHP. J Northwest For Univ. assessment model for waterfront spaces in historic ancient
2012;27(2):213-216. towns. Energy Build. 2025;331:115393.
Volume 2 Issue 3 (2025) 17 doi: 10.36922/DP025110020

