Page 88 - DP-2-3

Design+ Evaluation of recreational suitability of urban waterfront green spaces

Table 9. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results of Linyi Calligraphy Square
Objective layer Result Factor layer Result Primary indicator Result Secondary Result
indicator
Urban waterfront green spaces’ Excellent Environment (B1) Good Climatic conditions (C1) Average Sunshine hours Average
recreational suitability (A)
Temperature Average
Air quality Good
Rainfall Average
Wind speed Good
Environmental Good Water quality Good
functionality (C2)
Noise levels Good
Sanitation Good
Landscape (B2) Good Natural landscapes (C3) Good Vegetation Good
landscape
Geomorphic Good
landscape
Water landscape Good
Rock landscape Good
Cultural landscapes (C4) Excellent Pathway landscape Good
Architectural Good
sculptures
Historical sites Excellent
Resource (B3) Average Natural resources (C5) Average Plant diversity Average
Greening coverage Average
rate
Topography Good
Water resources Excellent
Cultural resources (C6) Excellent Cultural relics Excellent
Folk customs Good
Educational Good
facilities
Facility (B4) Excellent Basic facilities (C7) Excellent Signage Good
completeness
Facility diversity Excellent
Maintenance Good
status
Comfort level Good
Distribution Good
Recreational facilities Excellent Recreational facility Excellent
(C8) diversity
Recreational facility Good
fun
Facility Good
management
Facility safety Good
Waterfront facility Good
rationality
(Cont’d...)

Volume 2 Issue 3 (2025) 13 doi: 10.36922/DP025110020