Page 84 - DP-2-3

Design+ Evaluation of recreational suitability of urban waterfront green spaces

Table 5. Weights of the recreational suitability evaluation indicators of Linyi’s waterfront green spaces

Objective layer Factor layer Weight Primary indicator Weight Secondary indicator Composite weight Rank
Urban waterfront Environment (B1) 0.172 Climatic conditions 0.083 Sunshine hours 0.023 22
green spaces’ (C1) Temperature 0.024 19
recreational
suitability (A) Air quality 0.029 15
Rainfall 0.020 24
Wind speed 0.014 28
Environmental 0.090 Water quality 0.019 25
functionality (C2) Noise levels 0.014 30

Sanitation 0.029 14
Landscape (B2) 0.259 Natural landscapes 0.168 Vegetation landscape 0.044 3
(C3) Geomorphic landscape 0.038 6

Water landscape 0.040 4
Rock landscape 0.032 10
Cultural landscapes 0.091 Pathway landscape 0.039 5
(C4) Architectural sculptures 0.029 13
Historical sites 0.037 7
Resource (B3) 0.154 Natural resources (C5) 0.116 Plant diversity 0.026 18
Greening coverage rate 0.027 16
Topography 0.024 20
Water resources 0.021 23
Cultural resources (C6) 0.038 Cultural relics 0.023 21
Folk customs 0.019 26
Educational facilities 0.014 29
Facility (B4) 0.099 Basic facilities (C7) 0.048 Signage completeness 0.009 38
Facility diversity 0.008 42
Maintenance status 0.010 36
Comfort level 0.011 34
Distribution 0.010 37
Recreational facilities 0.051 Recreational facility diversity 0.009 40
(C8) Recreational facility fun 0.007 43

Facility management 0.008 41
Facility safety 0.017 27
Waterfront facility rationality 0.010 35
Recreational 0.267 Recreational space (C9) 0.137 Space diversity 0.031 11
experience (B5) Space comfort 0.061 1
Space safety 0.051 2
Waterfront accessibility 0.034 8
Recreational activities 0.130 Activity diversity 0.030 12
(C10) Participation level 0.032 9
Waterfront entertainment 0.027 17
Location/ 0.049 Location (C11) 0.021 Geographic location 0.009 39
Transportation Visitor proximity 0.013 33
(B6)
Transportation (C12) 0.028 Internal transportation 0.013 32
External transportation 0.013 31

Volume 2 Issue 3 (2025) 9 doi: 10.36922/DP025110020