Page 86 - DP-2-3

Design+ Evaluation of recreational suitability of urban waterfront green spaces

Table 7. Results for the evaluation indicators of Linyi  0.407 0.18 0.04 0.023  0.35
Calligraphy Square  0.297 0.453 0.19 0.047 0.013 
Evaluation indicator Evaluation criterion (%) R C 3 =   0.16 0.057 0.03   0.257 0.497 (VII)
Excellent Good Average Poor Very   0.297 0.41 0.227 0.04 0.027  
(5) (4) (3) (2) poor (1)  
Noise-limited condition 21.3 45.7 20.0 9.7 3.3
0 263 0 487 0 207 0030 013
 . . . . .
Environmental health 28.3 41.3 23.7 5.0 1.7  
.
.
.
.
.
Vegetation landscape 35.0 40.7 18.0 4.0 2.3 R C4 =   0 273 0 427 0 223 0060 017   (VIII)
Geomorphologic 29.7 45.3 19.0 4.7 1.3   1 0 0 0 0 
landscape
Water landscape 25.7 49.7 16.0 5.7 3.0  00100
Rock landscape 29.7 41.0 22.7 4.0 2.7   00100  
Pathway landscape 26.3 48.7 20.7 3.0 1.3 R =  01000  (IX)
C5
Architectural sculptures 27.3 42.7 22.3 6.0 1.7    10000   
Folk customs 30.7 39.3 20.0 8.3 1.7
Educational facilities 29.3 41.0 26.0 2.7 1.0  1 0 0 0 0 
Signage completeness 29.3 42.0 20.7 6.0 2.0 R =  0 307 0 393. . 02. 0 083 0 017. .  (X)
Maintenance status 33.7 40.7 20.0 4.0 1.7 C6    0 293. 041. 0 26 0 027. . 001.  
Comfort level 33.0 44.0 16.3 5.0 1.7  
Distribution 25.7 47.3 20.3 5.3 1.3  0 293. 042. 0 207. 006. 0 02. 
Recreational facility fun 31.7 37.7 22.0 6.7 2.0  1 0 0 0 0 
Facility management 29.3 43.7 20.3 4.7 2.0    
Facility safety 29.0 39.7 25.3 3.7 2.3 R C7 =  0 337 0 407. . 02. 004. 0 017.  (XI)
Waterfront facility safety 29.3 40.0 23.0 5.0 2.7   033. 0..44 . 0 163 . 005 . 0 017   
Space comfort 30.3 45.7 16.3 5.3 2.3  . 0 257 0 .473 0 .203 0 .053 0 .013 
Space safety 32.0 44.3 19.3 1.7 2.7
Waterfront accessibility 29.7 40.3 23.0 5.0 2.0   1 0 0 0 0  
Participation level 30.7 41.0 21.3 5.7 1.3  0 317 0 377. . 022. 0 067. 002. 
Waterfront 30.3 39.7 23.3 5.0 1.7 R C8 =  0 293 0 437 0 203 0 047. . . . 002.  (XII)
entertainment   0.229 0 397 0 253 0 037 0 023. . . .   
Visitor proximity 15.3 29.3 35.0 10.0 10.3  0 293. 04. 023. 0 05. 0 027. 
Internal transportation 26.3 46.3 22.3 2.7 2.3  
External transportation 29.7 42.0 22.3 3.7 2.3
 1 0 0 0 0 
 0 303 0 457 0 163 0 053 0 023. . . . . 
R C9 =   (XIII)
level evaluation indicators was established as follows in   032. 0 443 0 193 0 017 0 027. . . .  
Equations V-XVI:   0 0 297 0 403. . 023. 0 05. 002.  
 00100  
   1 0 0 0 0  
 00100  R =  0 307. 041. 0 213 0 057 0 013. . .  (XIV)
R =   01000   (V) C10   0 303 0 397 0 233. . . 005. 0 017.  
C1
 00100 
 
 01000   1 0 0 0 0 
R C11 =   0 153 0 293 0350 10 103. . . . .   (XV)
 0 1 0 0 0   
R C2 =    0 213 0 457. . 02. 0 097 0 033. .   (VI)  0 263 0 463 0 223 0 027 0 023. . . . .  
 0 283 0 413 0 237. . . 005. 0 017.  R C12 =   0 297. 042. 0 223 0 037 0 023. . .   (XVI)
   

Volume 2 Issue 3 (2025) 11 doi: 10.36922/DP025110020