Page 93 - DP-2-3

Design+ Evaluation of recreational suitability of urban waterfront green spaces

Appendices

Appendix 1. Questionnaire for screening evaluation indicators of recreational suitability in urban waterfront green spaces
Dear expert,
Hello! I am a professional student from the College of Agriculture and Forestry Science Garden, currently conducting
research on the urban waterfront green space recreation suitability evaluation index system. Given your in-depth research
in this field, I am seeking your professional knowledge and insights to determine the evaluation index. Hope you can,
despite being very busy, take a glance and precious time to fill in this form! Dear experts, based on your professional
judgment, please make important judgments and reasonable screenings for the indicators of this research, and score them
according to their importance at the end: “Unimportant 1 point, relatively unimportant 2 points, moderately important 3
points, relatively important 4 points, important 5 points.” Thank you very much for your help and guidance!

Table A1. Scoring table for recreational suitability indicators of urban waterfront green spaces

Objective layer Factor layer Primary indicator Classify and code Secondary indicator Score
Urban waterfront green spaces’ Environmental elements Climatic conditions 1 Ultraviolet radiation
recreational suitability
2 Temperature
3 Air quality
4 Air humidity
5 Rainfall
6 Wind speed
Environmental functionality 7 Water quality
8 Noise levels
9 Sanitation
Landscape elements Natural landscapes 10 Vegetation landscape
11 Geomorphic landscape
12 Revetment landscape
13 Water landscape
14 Rock landscape
15 Skyline view
Cultural landscapes 16 Pathway landscape
17 Architectural sculptures
18 Historical sites
19 Hard landscape
Resource elements Natural resources 20 Plant diversity
21 Greening coverage rate
22 Topography
23 Water resources
Cultural resources 24 Cultural relics
25 Folk customs
26 Festival activities
27 Educational facilities
Facility elements Basic facilities 28 Signage completeness
29 Facility diversity
30 Service condition
31 Maintenance status
(Cont’d...)

Volume 2 Issue 3 (2025) 18 doi: 10.36922/DP025110020