Page 53 - EER-1-1
P. 53

Explora: Environment
            and Resource                                                 WTW emissions of road, rail, sea, and air transport



            38.  Poll DI, Schumann U. An estimation method for the fuel   Assessing the environmental impact of eight alternative
               burn and other performance characteristics of civil transport   fuels in international shipping: A comparison of marginal
               aircraft in the cruise. Part  1, fundamental quantities and   vs. average emissions. Environments. 2023;10:155.
               governing relations for a general atmosphere.  Aeronaut J.      doi: 10.3929/ethz-b-000632254
               2021a;125(1284):257-295.
                                                               49.  MIT.  LCA of Current and Future GHG Emissions  from
               doi: 10.1017/aer.2020.62                           Petroleum Jet Fuel;  2016.  Available  from: https://www.
            39.  Poll DI, Schumann U. An estimation method for the fuel burn   energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/09/f33/speth_alternative_
               and other performance characteristics of civil transport aircraft   aviation_fuel_workshop.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 18].
               during cruise: Part 2, determining the aircraft’s characteristic   50.  Zhou W, Wang T, Yu Y, Chen D, Zhu B. Scenario analysis of
               parameters. Aeronaut J. 2021b;125(1284):296-340.   CO  emissions from China’s civil aviation industry through
                                                                     2
               doi: 10.1017/aer.2020.124                          2030. Appl Energy. 2016;175:100-108.
            40.  BITRE. Domestic Aviation Activity. Bureau of Infrastructure      doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.004
               and Transport Research Economics. Canberra, Australia:   51.  Jing L, El-Houjeiri HM, Monfort JC, et al. Understanding
               Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional   variability in petroleum jet fuel life cycle greenhouse gas
               Development, Communications and the Arts; 2023.    emissions to inform aviation decarbonization. Nat Commun.
            41.  Bonnefoy PA, Burdette G, Carroll T, et al. Assessment of CO   2  2022;13(1):7853-7853.
               Emission Metrics for a Commercial Aircraft Certification      doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35392-1
               Requirement. PARTNER Project 30, Interim Report, the
               Partnership  for  AiR  Transportation  Noise  and  Emissions   52.  Endresen O, Sørgård E, Sundet JK, et al. Emission from
               Reduction. Cambridge, USA: Massachusetts Institute of   international sea transportation and environmental impact.
               Technology; 2010.                                  J Geophys Res D Atmosp. 2003;108(17):4560.
            42.  Gnadt AR, Speth RL, Sabnis JS, Barrett SR. Technical and   doi: 10.1029/2002JD002898
               environmental assessment of all-electric 180-passenger   53.  Sausen R, Isaksen I, Grewe V, et al. Aviation radiative forcing
               commercial aircraft. Prog Aerospace Sci. 2019;105:1-30.  in 2000: An update on IPCC (1999).  Meteorol Zeitschr.
               doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.11.002                2005;14(4):555-561.
            43.  Ciliberti D, Vecchia PD, Memmolo V, Nicolosi F,      doi: 10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0049
               Wortmann G, Ricci F. The enabling technologies for a quasi-  54.  Fichter C, Marquart S, Suasen R, Lee DS. The impact of
               zero emissions commuter aircraft. Aerospace. 2022;9(6):319.  cruise altitude on contrails and related radiative forcing.
               doi: 10.3390/aerospace9060319                      Meteorol Zeitschr. 2005;14(4):563-572.
            44.  Quang PK, Dong DT, Hai PT. Evaluating environmental      doi: 10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0048
               impacts of an oil tanker using life cycle assessment method.   55.  Rädel G, Shine KP. Radiative forcing by persistent contrails
               Proc  Inst  Mech  Eng  Part  M  J  Eng  Maritime  Environ.   and its dependence on cruise altitudes.  J  Geophys Res.
               2010;235(3):705-717.                               2008;113(D7):D07105.
               doi: 10.1177/1475090221989195                      doi: 10.1029/2007JD009117
            45.  Kanchiralla FM, Brynolf S, Malmgren E, Hansson J,   56.  Xue D, Ng KK, Hsu LT. Multi-objective flight altitude
               Grahn  M. Life-cycle assessment and costing of fuels and   decision considering contrails, fuel consumption and flight
               propulsion  systems  in future fossil-free  shipping.  Environ   time. Sustainability. 2020;12(15):6253.
               Sci Technol. 2022;56(17):12517-12531.
                                                                  doi: 10.3390/SU12156253
               doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c03016
                                                               57.  Matthes S, Lim L, Burkhardt U, et al. Mitigation of non-CO
            46.  Hua J, Wu Y, Chen H. Alternative fuel for sustainable   Aviation’s climate impact by changing cruise altitudes.  2
               shipping across the Taiwan Strait. Transp Res Part D Transp   Aerospace. 2021;8(2):36.
               Environ. 2017;52(A):254-276.
                                                                  doi: 10.3390/aerospace8020036
               doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.015
                                                               58.  BITRE. Statistical Report - Domestic Aviation Activity 2019.
            47.  Huang J, Fan H, Xu X, Liu Z. Life cycle greenhouse gas   Canberra: Bureau of Infrastructure and Transport Research
               emission assessment for using alternative marine fuels:   Economics; 2020.
               A very large crude carrier (VLCC) case study. J Marine Sci   59.  ARTC.  Inland Rail Programme Business Case. Australia:
               Eng. 2022;10(12):1969.
                                                                  Australian Rail Track Corporation; 2015.
               doi: 10.3390/jmse10121969
                                                               60.  IEA.  GHG Intensity of Passenger Transport Modes, 2019.
            48.  Krantz G, Moretti C, Brandão M, Hedenqvist M, Nilsson F.   Paris: International Energy Agency; 2019. Available


            Volume 1 Issue 1 (2024)                         20                               doi: 10.36922/eer.3471
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58