Page 185 - EJMO-9-2
P. 185

Eurasian Journal of
            Medicine and Oncology                                       PD-1/L1 inhibitors in advanced CC: Multicenter retro



            was swiftly followed by revisions to the 2024 NCCN   evaluate the association between biomarker expression
            guidelines, which now endorse this combination as a first-  and clinical outcomes. These refinements are anticipated
            line therapeutic option for high-risk patients, including   to bolster the scientific rigor and clinical relevance of our
            those with bulky tumors (>4 cm), lymphovascular space   findings, thereby furnishing a more robust evidence base
            invasion, or suboptimal response to initial  therapy.    for the refinement of immunotherapy strategies in cervical
                                                         19
            The updated guidelines demonstrate transformative   cancer.
            potential for global cervical cancer management. Notably,
            in resource-limited settings where access to advanced   5. Conclusion
            therapies remains challenging, earlier integration of   Our findings demonstrate that primary treatment with
            immunotherapy may help reduce outcome disparities   PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors can provide significant survival
            across regions by circumventing radiation-dependent   benefits for Chinese patients with advanced cervical
            treatment paradigms. Conversely, in high-income    cancer. Notably, patients with relatively early-stage and
            countries, positioning immunotherapy as a cornerstone   smaller tumors seemed to obtain more benefits than their
            of multimodal therapeutic strategies could accelerate   counterparts. These findings suggest that the identification
            progress toward achieving the World Health Organization’s   of a patient cohort with favorable clinicopathological
            cervical cancer elimination targets. Collectively, these   features and molecular markers may enable the
            paradigm shifts herald a new era in oncology where   development of an “immunotherapy-sensitive cervical
            immunotherapy transitions from investigational concepts   cancer” paradigm for precision oncology. Moreover,
            to standard clinical practice. Meanwhile, ongoing clinical   we have identified a critical window for the dynamic
            trials evaluating rational combination approaches –   remodeling of the tumor immune microenvironment.
            particularly anti-PD-1 agents paired with PARP inhibitors   Initiating immunotherapy at an earlier stage, when tumor
            or anti-angiogenic therapies – are systematically exploring   burden  is  minimal, may optimize therapeutic  efficacy
            synergistic mechanisms, with preliminary results showing   by reversing T-cell exhaustion and remodeling the
            promising potential to redefine therapeutic landscapes.  immunosuppressive microenvironment. Hence, further
              The present study is subjected to several limitations   investigation is warranted to define optimal treatment
            that  warrant  explicit  acknowledgment.  Primarily,  the   timing and patient selection better to maximize the
            retrospective study design and the heterogeneity of the   benefits of immunotherapy in advanced cervical cancer.
            patient cohort may have introduced bias, as indicated by
            (i) substantial disparities in case accrual between the two   Acknowledgments
            participating Centers and (ii) potential systematic errors   None.
            stemming from variations in clinician expertise, clinical
            practices, and prescribing preferences concern PD-1/PD-L1   Funding
            inhibitors. Second, the abbreviated follow-up duration   None.
            precluded a comprehensive assessment of the long-term
            impact of immunotherapy on OS despite the observed   Conflict of interest
            PFS benefit, thereby necessitating extended follow-up data.
            Furthermore, the exclusion of 5.8% (12/204) of cases due   The authors declare they have no competing interests.
            to missing critical clinical data (e.g., treatment response   Author contributions
            or follow-up records) may have engendered selection bias
            in the survival analysis. Notably, the absence of PD-L1   Conceptualization: Haifeng Qiu
            expression assay data in 57.3% (110/192) of patients,   Formal analysis: Min Wang, Xia
            potentially attributable to inadequate clinical detection rates   Investigation: Dian Wang, Ning Su
            due to assay costs, may have compromised the precision of   Methodology: Min Wang, Xiao Li
            the efficacy evaluation of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.  Writing – original draft: Min Wang
                                                               Writing – review & editing: Min Wang, Xiao Li
              To  mitigate  the  limitations above, we  propose
            the   following   methodological  enhancements:    Ethics approval and consent to participate
            (i) implementation of a multicenter prospective cohort
            study, incorporating standardized data acquisition and   Written informed consent was not required for this study
            a uniform therapeutic regimen, (ii) augmentation of   because this is a retrospective study.
            the sample size to 300  cases, coupled with an extended   Consent for publication
            follow-up duration of 36 months, and (iii) establishment of
            a PD-L1 dynamic monitoring subgroup to systematically   Not applicable.


            Volume 9 Issue 2 (2025)                        177                              doi:10.36922/ejmo.8074
   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190