Page 307 - EJMO-9-3
P. 307
Eurasian Journal of
Medicine and Oncology Mini-laparotomy tubal reanastomosis outcomes
7. Garcia CR. Oviductal anastomosis procedures. In: Human 15. Kim SH, Shin CJ, Kim JG, Moon SY, Lee JY, Chang YS.
Sterilization. Springfiled: Thomas Charle; 1972. p. 116. Microsurgical reversal of tubal sterilization: A report on
8. Sedbon E, Delajolinieres JB, Boudouris O, Madelenat P. 1,118 cases. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(5):865-870.
Tubal desterilization through exclusive laparoscopy. Hum doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00361-0
Reprod. 1989;4(2):158-159.
16. Sastre J, Mínguez JA, Alcázar JL, Chiva L. Microsurgical
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136862 anastomosis of the fallopian tubes after tubal ligation:
9. Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Margossian H, Stevens L. Robotic- A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol
assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: Reprod Biol. 2023;291:168-177.
A human pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(5):1040-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.10.017
doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00423-4
17. Feng Y, Zhao H, Xu H, et al. Analysis of pregnancy outcome
10. Elci G, Elci E, Sayan S, Hanligil E. Is there any difference after anastomosis of oviduct and its influencing factors.
between pregnancy results after tubal reanastamosis BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):393.
performed laparotomically, laparoscopically, and
robotically? Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022;15(2):261-269. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2469-2
doi: 10.1111/ases.12991 18. Boeckxstaens A, Devroey P, Collins J, Tournaye H. Getting
pregnant after tubal sterilization: Surgical reversal or IVF?
11. Berger GS, Thorp JM Jr., Weaver MA. Effectiveness of Hum Reprod. 2007;22(10):2660-2664.
bilateral tubotubal anastomosis in a large outpatient
population. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(5):1120-1125. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem248
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew038 19. Peregrine J, McGovern PG, Brady PC, Ginsburg ES,
Schlaff W. Restoring fertility in women aged 40 years and
12. Koh CH, Janik GM. Laparoscopic microsurgery: Current and older after tubal ligation: tubal anastomosis versus in vitro
future status. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999;11(4):401-407.
fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(4):735-742.
doi: 10.1097/00001703-199908000-00007
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.01.041
13. Madison A, Alamri L, Schwartz A, Brolinson M,
DeCherney A. Conventional laparoscopy is the better 20. Karayalcin R, Ozcan S, Tokmak A, Gürlek B, Yenicesu O,
option for tubal sterilization reversal: A closer look at Timur H. Pregnancy outcome of laparoscopic tubal
tubal reanastomosis. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). reanastomosis: Retrospective results from a single clinical
2021;2(1):375-380. centre. J Int Med Res. 2017;45(3):1245-1252.
doi: 10.1089/whr.2021.0039 doi: 10.1177/0300060517709815
14. van Seeters JAH, Chua SJ, Mol BWJ, Koks CAM. Tubal 21. Barac S, Jiga LP, Rata A, Sas I, Onofrei RR, Ionac M. Role
anastomosis after previous sterilization: A systematic review. of reconstructive microsurgery in tubal infertility in young
Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(3):358-370. women. J Clin Med. 2020;9(5):1300.
doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx003 doi: 10.3390/jcm9051300
Volume 9 Issue 3 (2025) 299 doi: 10.36922/EJMO025150111

