Page 9 - EJMO-9-3
P. 9

Eurasian Journal of Medicine

                                                                                    and Oncology





                                        EDITORIAL
                                        From the Editor’s desk



                                        Bernd Kaina*
                                        Institute of Toxicology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany




                                        Two articles have appeared in this volume of the  Eurasian Journal of Medicine and
                                        Oncology that I would like to address. The work by Rauf et al.  describes two natural
                                                                                           1
                                        compounds  isolated  from  Pistacia  chinensis. This  tree  is found  primarily  in China
                                        and is planted as a street tree in temperate zones worldwide due to its attractive fruit
                                        and beautiful autumn foliage. Two flavonoids were extracted from the tree’s bark. The
                                        flavonoids are polyphenols, and their chemical structures are described in the manuscript.
                                        In silico analyses showed that the phytochemicals, designated as compound 1 and
                                        compound 2, bind to several target proteins, including mechanistic target of rapamycin
                                        (mTOR) and protein kinase B 1 (encoded by AKT1). They could therefore potentially
                                        influence the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)–AKT–mTOR pathway. If this binding
                                        has an inhibitory effect, it could lead to reduced protein synthesis and, consequently,
                                        inhibition of cell growth and proliferation. It could also contribute to increased levels
                                        and activation of tumor suppressor protein p53 through targeting mouse double minute
                                        2 homolog  (MDM2), as well as to the activation of pro-apoptotic proteins such as BCL2,
                                        thereby stimulating pro-apoptotic signaling. A third effect is based on the inhibition
                                        of autophagy by mTORC1, which may also be inhibited. In summary, pro-apoptotic
                                        processes could be promoted, and cells could be specifically driven to undergo cell death.
                                          In light of this scenario, the authors also investigated cell death using the glioblastoma
                                        cell line U87MG. In the 3-(4,5-di methyl thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
            *Corresponding author:      (MTT)  assay,  the  flavonoids  showed  a  positive  effect,  which  is  interpreted  as  anti-
            Bernd Kaina                 cancer activity. However, it must be noted that the MTT assay is a metabolic assay and
            (kaina@uni-mainz.de)        reflects both proliferation inhibition and actual cell death. Unfortunately, these toxicity
            Citation: Kaina B. From the Editor’s   studies were not extended, and the authors did not assess apoptosis or, where applicable,
            desk. Eurasian J Med Oncol.   necroptosis. Therefore, it remains unclear whether the effects observed through the
            2025;9(3):1-3.              MTT assay are due to genuine cell death or simply reflect growth inhibition.
            doi: 10.36922/EJMO025360369
            Received: August 21, 2025     This is clearly a limitation of the work. Observing a growth-inhibitory or cytotoxic
                                        effect on a tumor cell line should not immediately lead to the conclusion that a substance
            Accepted: September 1, 2025  has “anti-cancer activity.” Such a conclusion requires evidence that the substance is
            Published online: September 23,   selectively active against tumor cells and not toxic to non-transformed cells. This implies
            2025                        that a broad panel of cell lines should be tested. Animal experiments are also necessary
            Copyright: © 2025 Author(s).   before claims of anti-cancer activity can be made. The term “activity on cancer cell lines”
            This is an Open-Access article   would be more precise and appropriate in this context.
            distributed under the terms of the
            Creative Commons Attribution   Nevertheless, the study is interesting because it reports the identification of a new
            License, permitting distribution,
            and reproduction in any medium,   group of natural compounds with potential relevance for cancer therapy. In future
            provided the original work is   research, it would be worthwhile to characterize the effects at both the cellular and
            properly cited.             molecular levels in detail, to answer important open questions. For example, in the
            Publisher’s Note: AccScience   toxicity prediction assay, one of the compounds tested positive in the Ames test. This
            Publishing remains neutral with   could indicate that at least one of the substances has genotoxic potential. Genotoxic
            regard to jurisdictional claims in
            published maps and institutional   effects are clearly linked to cytotoxicity, as p53-dependent apoptotic signaling pathways
            affiliations.               are activated through DNA damage.  In fact, some natural compounds that exert
                                                                      2

            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2025)                         1                          doi: 10.36922/EJMO025360369
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14