Page 21 - ESAM-1-4

Engineering Science in
Additive Manufacturing Experimental statistics in AM

13. Prakash KS, Nancharaih T, Rao VS. Additive manufacturing 2024. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/
techniques in manufacturing-an overview. Mater Today publication/383874030_An_overview_of_the_design_
Proc. 2018;5(2):3873-3882. of_optimal_experiments_and_statistical_practices_for_
scientific_and_engineering_applications [Last accessed on
doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.642
2025 Sep 27].
14. Wiese M, Kwauka A, Thiede S, Herrmann C. Economic
assessment for additive manufacturing of automotive end- 27. ISO/ASTM International. ISO/ASTM 52901:2016 - Additive
use parts through digital light processing (DLP). CIRP J Manufacturing-General Principles-Requirements for Purchased
Manuf Sci Technol. 2021;35:268-280. AM Parts. United States: ASTM International; 2016.
28. ISO/ASTM International. ISO/ASTM
doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.06.020
52915:2016 - Specification for Additive Manufacturing
15. Wong KV, Hernandez A. A review of additive manufacturing. File Format (AMF), Version 1.2. United States: ASTM
ISRN Mechan Eng. 2012;2012:208760. International; 2016.
doi: 10.5402/2012/208760 29. Gijbels I, Prosdocimi I. Loess. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput
Stat. 2010;2(5):590-599.
16. Pinto JM, Cristobal A, Marcelo EA, et al. Sensitivity analysis
of geometric errors in additive manufacturing medical doi: 10.1002/wics.104
models. Med Eng Phys. 2015;37(3):328-334.
30. Schmitz H, Nadvi K. Clustering and industrialization:
doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.01.009 Introduction. World Dev. 1999;27(9):1503-1514.
17. Petruse RE, Puşcaşu S, Pascu A, Bondrea I. Key factors 31. Wijuniamurti S, Nugroho S, Rachmawati R. Agglomerative
towards a high-quality additive manufacturing process with nesting (AGNES) method and divisive analysis (DIANA)
ABS material. Mater Today Proc. 2019;12:358-366. method for hierarchical clustering on some distance
measurement concepts. J Stat Data Sci. 2022;1(1):7-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.03.136
doi: 10.33369/jsds.v1i1.21009
18. Zhang B, Raiyan S, Lei X, et al. An efficient framework for
printability assessment in laser powder bed fusion metal 32. Rojo J, Rivero R, Romero-Morte J, et al. Modeling pollen time
additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2021;46:102018. series using seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based
on LOESS smoothing. Int J Biometeorol. 2017;61:335-348.
doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102018
doi: 10.1007/s00484-016-1215-y
19. Johnson L, Mohamad M, Bing Z, et al. Assessing printability
maps in additive manufacturing of metal alloys. Acta Mater. 33. Dickersin K, Mayo-Wilson E. Standards for design and
2019;176:199-210. measurement would make clinical research reproducible and
usable. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(11):2590-2594.
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.005
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708273114
20. Sun S, Brandt M, Easton MJLAM. Powder bed fusion
processes: An overview. In: Laser Additive Manufacturing. 34. McNair L. Ethical and regulatory oversight of clinical
Netherlands: Elsevier; 2017. p. 55-77. research: The role of the Institutional Review Board. Exp
Biol Med (Maywood). 2022;247(7):561-566
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100433-3.00002-6
doi: 10.1177/15353702221078216
21. Fisher RA. Design of experiments. BMJ. 1936;1(3923):554.
35. ASTM International. ASTM E2709-12: Standard Practice
22. Hicks CR. Fundamental Concepts in the Design of
Experiments. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1964. for Demonstrating Capability to Comply with an Acceptance
Procedure. United States: ASTM International; 2012.
23. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments.
United States: John Wiley & Sons; 2017. 36. ASTM International. ASTM F2924-14: Standard Specification
for Additive Manufacturing Titanium-6 Aluminum-4
24. Khuri AI, Mukhopadhyay S. Response surface methodology. Vanadium with Powder Bed Fusion. United States: ASTM
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2010;2(2):128-149. International; 2014.
doi: 10.1002/wics.73 37. ASTM International. ASTM F3001-14: Standard Specification
for Additive Manufacturing Titanium-6 Aluminum-4
25. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM. Response
Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) with Powder Bed
Using Designed Experiments. 4 ed. United States: John Fusion. United States: ASTM International; 2015.
th
Wiley & Sons; 2016. 38. ASTM International. ASTM F2077-17: Standard Test
26. Lynch CM, Wicker RB, Villalobos JR. An Overview of the Methods for Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices. United
Design of Optimal Experiments and Statistical Practices States: ASTM International; 2017.
for Scientific and Engineering Applications. ResearchGate; 39. ASTM International. ASTM F382-19: Standard Specification

Volume 1 Issue 4 (2025) 15 doi: 10.36922/ESAM025340021