Page 103 - GHES-1-2

Global Health Econ Sustain Burnout syndrome in the public and private sectors

(SD = 0.7 points). The Cronbach’s alpha value of this scale value indicates greater enjoyment and satisfaction, which
was greater than 0.7, indicating acceptable reliability. is translated into better quality of life.
3.3. Measurements of quality of life scale using In this sample, the scale of quality of life ranged from
QQ-LES-Q 3.6 to 100.0 points with a mean value of 58.7 points
(SD=0.90 points). The Cronbach’s alpha value of this scale
The descriptive data on the quality of life scale are presented exceeded 0.7, indicating acceptable reliability.
in Table 5. The scale ranges from 0 to 100 points. A higher
Table 6 presents the ratings of the surveyed respondents
Table 3. Burnout levels of the surveyed respondents in the overall satisfaction over the week leading up to the
survey and the satisfaction with medication, particularly
Dimension Ν % among those who take medications for treatment purposes.
Exhaustion More than half of the participants (53.5%) reported
Low 25 22.3 high levels of overall satisfaction (“good” and “very good”)
Moderate 52 46.4 during the week before the survey. Slightly less than a
High 29 25.9 quarter of the respondents (22.3%) had a neutral feeling
Very high 6 5.4 about the overall satisfaction over the week before the
Mental distance survey. For those taking medication, 30.3% of them were
Low 18 16.1 highly satisfied with their medications (“good” and “very
good”), while a quarter of them (25.8%) reported neutral
Moderate 60 53.6 level of medication satisfaction. Details regarding the
High 26 23.2 overall satisfaction and medication satisfaction among the
Very high 8 7.1 surveyed respondents are summarized in Table 6.
Cognitive impairment
Low 20 17.9 3.4. Correlation of the quality of life scale, mental
resilience scale, and burnout scale
Moderate 63 56.3
High 21 18.8 Table 7 depicts the correlations between the quality of life scale,
Very high 8 7.1 mental resilience scale, and dimensions of burnout scale.
Emotional impairment
Table 5. Score of the quality of life scale
Low 19 17.0
Moderate 65 58.0 Minimum Maximum Mean Cronbach’s
value value (SD) alpha
High 20 17.9
Quality of life scale 3.6 100.0 58.7 (18.8) 0.90
Very high 8 7.1
Abbreviation: SD: Standard deviation.
Psychological distress
Low 20 17.9 Table 6. Overall satisfaction and medication satisfaction
Moderate 57 50.9 among the surveyed respondents
High 28 25.0
N %
Very high 7 6.3
Overall satisfaction
Psychosomatic symptoms
Very little 5 4.5
Low 21 18.8
Little 22 19.6
Moderate 60 53.6
Neutral 25 22.3
High 25 22.3
Good 51 45.5
Very high 6 5.4
Very good 9 8.0
Medication satisfaction
Table 4. Score of the mental resilience scale
Very little 18 27.3
Minimum Maximum Mean Cronbach’s Little 11 16.7
value value (SD) alpha
Neutral 17 25.8
Mental 1.0 4.8 3.2 (0.7) 0.84
resilience scale Good 15 22.7
Very good 5 7.6
Abbreviation: SD: Standard deviation.

Volume 1 Issue 2 (2023) 5 https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.1751