Page 14 - GHES-2-2
P. 14

Global Health Econ Sustain                               COVID-19 pandemic and quality of life of cancer patients




            Table 1. Summary of the selected reviews
            References      Characteristics
            Li et al., 2021  •  Investigation on the adverse effects of COVID-19 on the screening, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of cancer patients.
                            •  List of measures taken by various organizations worldwide for the protection of cancer patients.
            Garutti et al., 2020  •  Summary of the psychological issues of patients with cancer: logistic overload, loneliness, fear, oxymoronic thoughts,
                             helplessness, frustration, and emotional overload.
                            •  An extensive description of the above psychological threats and quoting practical proposals for their management.
            Kumar and Dey, 2020  •  Treatment delay classification and analysis factors that delay treatment.
                            •  Categorizatios of the factors due to its delay’s treatment of patient-related factors and health summary-related factors.
                            •  List of the advantages and disadvantages of delays and explanation of the implications for patients.
            Pelle et al., 2020  •  The effective conduct of surgical operations in patients with breast cancer during the pandemic.
            Wang et al., 2020  •  The impact of COVID-19 on the psychology and treatments received by lung cancer patients.
            Al-Maweri et al., 2020 •  The importance of rapid diagnosis of oral cancer and how COVID-19 affects diagnosis and patient habits and that the
                             presentation of telemedicine is a good solution.
            Longo et al., 2021  •  The management of head-and-neck cancer patients during the outbreak of the pandemic included reorganization of the
                             outpatient clinic and, more generally, regulation of the operation of health structures using telemedicine and protection
                             protocols against the spread of the virus.
            Rakhsha et al., 2020  •  The modification of oncology care for patientssuffering from cancer in a developing country during the pandemic using
                             personalized health-care protocols.

            the infection from COVID-19 and the evolution of cancer   consequences, which reduced their overall quality of
            due to reduced access to health facilities. Frey et al. (2020),   life. Initially, the COVID-19 pandemic caused serious
            Longo et al. (2021), Pelle et al. (2020), Catania et al. (2020),   financial problems, resulting in many cancer patients
            and Wang et al. (2020) concluded that patients with cancer   finding themselves in an unfavorable economic position,
            types they were researching felt a strong fear of contracting   which led to them not being able to afford the treatment.
            COVID-19. Frey et al. (2020), Longo et al. (2021), Gallo   In particular, Frey  et al. (2020), Gallo  et al. (2021), and
            et al. (2021), Catania et al. (2020), and Wang et al. (2020)   Younger et al. (2020) agreed that the economic effects of
            agreed that ovarian cancer patients, HNC, and lung cancer,   the pandemic affected the quality of life of cancer patients,
            respectively, felt, at the same time, a fear of the development   while on the contrary, Soriano et al. (2021) and Kurzhals
            of cancer during the pandemic. Soriano et al. (2021), Pelle   et  al. (2021) argued that financial issues had no impact
            et al. (2020), Bartels et al. (2021), and Ratnasekera et al.   on cancer patients. In addition, due to the restrictive
            (2020) concluded that the patients they investigated had   measures  imposed  to  avoid  the  spread  of  COVID-19,
            severe fear of cancer progression.                 their social interactions were reduced, which affected their
              The research of Kurzhals et al. (2021) in patients with   social lives. Specifically, Gallo et al. (2021) emphasized the
            skin cancer instead showed low levels of fear during the   social stigma in patients with HNC who, due to the intense
            pandemic, while Greco  et al. (2021), who investigated   cough, which is a clinical symptom of the disease, aroused
            cancer urinary tract, and Younger  et al.  (2020), who   the suspicion that they probably suffer from COVID-19.
            examined sarcoma, did not report the parameter of fear.   Also, as reported by Frey et al. (2020), women with ovarian
            In addition, all authors except Catania et al. (2020), Wang   cancer, were forced to remain at home and in isolation due
            et al. (2020), and Greco et al. (2021) agreed that loneliness   to fear of disease, losing their social role as mothers and
            was  one of  the  basic  feelings experienced by  cancer   wives.
            patients during the pandemic. The Gallo  et  al.’s (2021)   4. Discussion
            report highlighted that patients with HNC were twice
            as likely to develop suicidal tendencies during COVID-  The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic brought about
            19  as  compared  to  patients  with  other  forms  of  cancer.   significant changes in the daily lives of cancer patients. Due
            However, the development of telemedicine in the midst of   to the protective measures for COVID-19, the overload of
            the pandemic has helped cancer patients mitigate negative   the health system, and the modifications of the protocols of
            emotions such as anxiety and fear, as well as through   the health facilities, the oncology community found itself
            communication with their doctor.                   in an extremely unfavorable position.
              In addition to the psychological effects caused by   Delays in cancer treatment during the pandemic
            the pandemic, cancer patients faced more adverse   contributed to  the  progression of  the  disease.  The delay


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2024)                         6                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.2636
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19