Page 108 - GHES-2-3
P. 108

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                           Social support and quality of life in Indian elderly


            2.1.1. Inclusion criteria                          coefficients. The WHOQOL-BREF scale demonstrated a

            Participants aged 60 years and older who were permanent   high level of reliability with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient
            residents of the district and present during data collection   of 0.92. This finding contrasts with a study by Mondal
            periods were eligible for inclusion. Before participation, all   et al. (2020), which reported a lower Cronbach’s alpha
            individuals provided informed consent.             coefficient of 0.76 for the same scale. For the MSPSS,
                                                               our study yielded a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.75,
            2.1.2. Exclusion criteria                          while Zimet et al. (1988) reported a higher value (0.88)
                                                               in their research. Despite these variations, the Cronbach’s
            Participants were excluded if they were critically ill, unable
            to communicate verbally, or had hearing impairments. In   alpha  coefficients  in  the  present  study  indicate  good
            addition, refusal to provide consent resulted in exclusion   internal consistency for the different facets, with values
            from the study.                                    ranging from 0.65 to 0.93, as suggested by the WHO (The
                                                               WHOQOL Group, 1998).
            2.2. Data collection
                                                               2.4. Statistical analysis
            Sociodemographic data encompassing variables such as
            gender, age, marital status, caste, religion, educational   The statistical analyses were carried out using STATA
            status, wealth category, and employment status were   version 16.0 (StataCorp, USA). Descriptive analyses and
            gathered through the administration of a structured   correlation  analyses  were  employed  to  assess  the  data,
            questionnaire. In addition, the data collection process   with a specific focus on person correlation analysis for
            involved the utilization of a 26-item the World Health   evaluating the associations among numerical variables.
            Organization Quality of Life Scale-BREF version    A p ≤ 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance.
            (WHOQOL-BREF) scale and a 12-item Multidimensional   3. Results
            Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) scale.
                                                               3.1. Characteristics of the studied population
              QOL was evaluated using the WHOQOL_BREF scale
            developed  in  1996  (WHO,  1996).  This  scale  comprises   The social demographic characteristics of the participants
            a total of 26 items, categorized into four subdomains:   (N  = 476), as extracted from the self-administered
            physical QOL,  psychological QOL,  social QOL,  and   questionnaire,  are  shown  in  Table  1.  Among  the
            environmental QOL. Respondents rated the items using a   participants, the majority were males (257 [54%]). The age
            five-point Likert scale (1 = Never to 5 = Extremely), with   group 60 – 69 years comprised 251 participants (52.7%),
            higher scores indicating a higher QOL. Following WHO   and most of the participants were married (273 [57.3%]).
            guidelines, raw scores for each domain were calculated   More than four-fifths of the participants (385 [80.8%])
            by summing individual item values and subsequently   were Hindu, and most were from other backward classes
            transforming them to a scale ranging from 0 to 100, where   (205 [43%]). In addition, 305 participants (64%) were
            100 represents the highest value, and 0 denotes the lowest.   illiterate and had no formal primary education. In terms of
            Mean scores for each domain and the total score were   wealth, most of the participants (249 [52.3%]) were poor.
            subsequently calculated. Higher scores on the WHOQOL-  Fewer than one-fourth of the participants (114 [23.9%])
            BREF indicate better QOL.                          were employed.

              The MSPSS, introduced by Zimet  et al. (1988),   3.2. Mean scores of QOL and perceived social
            comprises 12 items distributed across three subdomains:   support of the studied population
            Family, friends, and significant others. Participants rated
            the items using a seven-point Likert scale, ranging from   On average, participants rated their social relationship QOL
            very strongly disagree (1) to very strongly agree (7). Total   the highest, with a mean score of 53.12 ± 17.60. The physical
            scores, reflecting perceived support from family, friends,   domain, which had a mean score of 40.55 ± 9.41, was the
            and significant others in life, ranged from 12 to 84, with   most affected. The overall total QOL score (44.90 ± 8.91)
            higher scores indicating greater levels of support. Mean   falls between these domains, indicating a moderately
            scores for each subdomain and the overall total score were   balanced QOL among the studied participants.
            computed.                                            The study participants perceived family as providing the
                                                               highest level of social assistance (19.41 ± 3.52), followed
            2.3. Reliability analyses
                                                               by friends (18.19 ± 2.47). However, the majority of study
            In the present study, the reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF   participants felt that their significant others provided
            and MSPSS scales was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha   minimal social support (16.82 ± 3.07) (Table 2).




            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2024)                         4                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.2358
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113