Page 149 - GHES-2-3
P. 149

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                                       Parenting in a changing climate


            relationship between climate change and mental health,   perceived impact on fulfilling life roles, such as attending
            and as such, there is a necessity for evidence on measures   to work and family responsibilities, clusters around a
            to mitigate the impact (Wu et al., 2020). Climate change   separate factor termed functional impairment. Those
            anxiety is a prominent term associated with the effect of   scoring highly on validated scales report specific anxieties
            the climate crisis on mental health and mental distress. It   around climate change as causing a significant impact on
            is considered a heightened emotional or mental distress in   mental health (Coffey et al., 2021). Climate change anxiety
            response to the extreme changes in the climate (Alliance,   is correlated with depression (Clayton & Karazsia, 2020;
            2020). However, worrying about the climate crisis is a   Larionow  et al., 2022) and generalized anxiety (Clayton
            rational reaction to the potential threat to life and a fear for   & Karazsia, 2020), though further research is required to
            the future (Wray, 2023), with parenthood found to cause   establish cause-effect relations (Heeren  et al., 2023) and
            an increase in climate change worries when compared to   cross-cultural validity (Larionow et al., 2022).
            individuals without parental responsibilities (Ekholm,   Research indicates several variables associated with
            2020).                                             climate change anxiety, indicating that some people are
              Parental climate anxiety has also been reported by   more likely to be affected (Clayton, 2020; Hickman, 2020;
            Gaziulusoy (2020), who reported that parents not only   Jackson  et al., 2023; Lee  et al., 2020; Ojala, 2012; van
            expressed their worries, sadness, and hopelessness for their   Nieuwenhuizen et al., 2021; Vergunst & Berry, 2022; Wu
            children but also their perceived inadequacy to sufficiently   et al., 2023). An individual’s personality, age, and where
            prepare them for the future. This presents a significant   they live can influence the degree to which they experience
            challenge for parents, particularly as Corner et al. (2015)   climate change anxiety (Clayton, 2020). Young adults (Wu
            identify them as among the trusted messengers of climate   et al., 2020), farming communities, and those living in
            change, highlighting their potential to positively influence   areas directly impacted by climate change-induced weather
            the actions and outlook of their children. This role is   events are particularly susceptible (Cunsolo et al., 2020).
            concurred by Madden et al. (2023), while Léger-Goodes   Those with knowledge about climate change (Asgarizadeh
            et al. (2023) argue that parents can also influence the extent   et al., 2023), engaging in eco-behaviors (Lukacs  et al.,
            to which their children experience climate change anxiety.   2023), studying environmental topics (Daeninck  et al.,
            That said, it has also been found that parents may not be   2023), and those who feel an affinity with nature (Coffey
            aware  of  their  children’s  worries  about  climate  change.   et al., 2021) are also more likely to experience climate
            Indeed,  during  interviews  with  parent-child  dyads,   anxiety. Despite these associations, there is a limited
            Léger-Goodes et al. (2023) found that while some parents   understanding  of  how  conversations  between  children
            reported their children were unconcerned about climate   and their parents about climate change relate to parental
            change, the children themselves divulged their worry. This   climate change anxiety. Therefore, this study aims to
            indicates that parents may not only need to manage their   explore the relationship between United  Kingdom (UK)
            own anxieties toward climate change but also navigate   parents’/carers’ engagement with their children aged 5 –
            preparing their child/children for an uncertain future   11 years regarding climate change and (i) climate change
            while anticipating and indeed managing potential climate   anxiety, (ii) eco-behaviors, or (iii) parental demographics.
            anxiety.                                           2. Methods
              Growing symptoms related to climate change anxiety
            have led organizations worldwide to raise this psychological   2.1. Study design
            phenomenon as in need of action. Current evidence   The study adopted a cross-sectional approach for
            highlights  that  the  issue  of  climate  change  exacerbates   data collection from parents with at least one child
            mental distress, particularly among young people, even for   aged 5 – 11  years (UK primary school age) using an
            individuals who are not directly affected (Lawrance et al.,   online questionnaire (Appendix A1). The anonymous
            2021). This phenomenon is recognized as a global mental   questionnaire  incorporated  the  Climate  Change  Anxiety
            health risk, with its incidence increasing (Swim  et al.,   Scale (Clayton & Karazsia, 2020) to explore differences
            2022). Climate change anxiety has been operationalized   in  climate  change anxiety and  eco-behaviors across
            as a multi-factor construct, measurable by self-report, and   demographic characteristics. The Climate Change
            differentiated from general anxiety (Clayton & Karazsia,   Anxiety Scale comprises 22 items. Items 1 – 13 evaluate
            2020). The emotional reaction to climate change in this   climate change anxiety, consisting of cognitive-emotional
            formulation is seen to cluster around a factor termed   impairment (Items 1 – 8, Cronbach’s alpha = 0.79)
            cognitive-emotional impairment, which captures the self-  and functional impairment (Items 9 – 13, Cronbach’s
            perceived impact on affective and cognitive resources. Self-  alpha = 0.78). Items 14 – 16 evaluate eco-behavior,


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2024)                         2                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.3172
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154