Page 196 - GHES-3-1
P. 196

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                                        Outsourcing last-mile delivery


            1.10. Specific concepts: Independent variables
                                                                         Independent        Dependent
            As defined by Kalinzi (2020), outsourcing involves            Variables         Variables
            contracting out job functions to specialized, efficient
            service providers who become valued business partners. In
            supply chain management, 3PL refers to an organization                             Cost
            that  uses external  enterprises to  handle distribution,      3PL Speed          Reduction
            warehousing,  and  fulfillment  services.  Although  3PL
            providers do not own the products within the supply chain,
            they take responsibility for their clients’ goods through      3PL Safety          Timely
            various distribution centers (Manotas-Duque et al., 2016).     & Security         Delivery
            These providers often specialize in integrated warehouse
            and transportation operations, which can be scaled and
                                                                           3PL Local
                                                                                              End-User
            adapted to meet customer demands and delivery service          Knowledge         Satisfaction
            requirements (Essilfie-Baiden, 2020).
              Outsourcing logistics to 3PL providers is a      Figure 1. Conceptual model for the study. (Source: The authors, 2022)
            strategic decision involving several processes and   Abbreviation: 3PL: Third-party logistics.
            criteria that vary across industries and organizations.
            A  3PL provider’s performance directly impacts the   1.11. Fundamental theories
            outsourcing organization’s supply chain performance and   This study is grounded in resource-based theory (RBT) and
            competitiveness (Aigbavboa & Mbohwa, 2019); therefore,   network theory. The RBT posits that organizations seeking
            organizations must possess the necessary skills and capacity   valuable,  scarce,  inimitable,  and  well-organized  resources
            to select and manage 3PLs effectively to achieve the desired   should consider outsourcing to external providers to
            outcomes. While 3PL usage has generally reduced logistics   overcome internal resource deficiencies. A strong relationship
            costs, Premkumar  et al. (2021) attribute this decrease to   between firms and external providers can become an
            innovative practices by logistics service providers. Effective   intangible resource for the organization, emphasizing
            communication, transparency, and collaboration between   the importance of relationship management and service
            the outsourcing organizations and logistics service providers   adaptability for outsourcing success (Van Thai et al., 2021);
            are critical to achieving long-term success in logistics   however, critics argue that the theory does not clearly define
            outsourcing; these elements ensure ongoing performance,   valuable or scarce resources (Hitt et al., 2015; Ibrahim, 2020).
            early conflict resolution, and smoother termination of   Network theory focuses on the synergies achieved
            relationships (Etokudoh et al., 2017; Paulraj & Chen, 2007).  through collaborations within a network, which can
              In Africa, government agencies face challenges   lead  to  competitive  advantages  through  enhanced
            outsourcing to private sector players due to difficulty   service and flexibility (Skjoett-Larsen, 2000). It stresses
            measuring  outcomes.  Private  companies  typically  assess   the importance of managing relationships by fostering
            success in monetary terms, whereas governments and   an information-sharing culture with other companies;
            health systems rely on specific key performance indicators   however, organizations within established networks may
            (KPIs) (Muthoni, 2016; Simon et al., 2020; USAID, 2011).   face limitations in pursuing activities that align with their
            The potential for outsourcing to diminish some controls   objectives (Ibrahim, 2020).
            imposed by KPIs requires that public and private sectors   1.12. Gaps in the literature
            collaborate  to  manage  outsourcing  contracts  effectively
            (Village Reach, 2016).                             Existing literature primarily addresses supply chain
                                                               operations in public, non-profit environments, where
              The selection of a suitable 3PL provider is crucial for   development partners largely bear costs. Studies have shown
            logistical performance. Choosing an inappropriate provider   that using 3PL providers for last-mile delivery of health
            can reduce service quality, increase inefficiencies, and lead   products, often funded by donors, reduces stockouts and
            to a disconnect between the 3PL and the outsourcing   improves product availability. This situation allows health
            organization, resulting in significant issues (Karamaşa   workers to focus on clinical duties rather than logistics
            et al., 2020). Figure 1 outlines the six key criteria affecting   (Agrawal  et al., 2016); however, when donor funding
            the selection of 3PL providers: cost, customer service   ceases, the transition to local government responsibility
            quality, data processing ability, operational performance,   is often problematic, and government agencies may be
            supply chain capability, and sustainability.       reluctant to continue the program due to various factors.


            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2025)                        188                       https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.4714
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201