Page 276 - GHES-3-3
P. 276

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                  Sustainability of Rwanda’s UHC: 2011–2021 and vision 2050


            contracting unless they can reduce their costs (Hsiao et al.,   4.6. Rationale for abolishing the co-payment scheme
            2007; Nyandekwe  et al., 2020). Although most providers   The prepayment system reflects CBHI members’ ownership
            oppose capitation, the study argues that bundled payments can   and aligns with Rwanda’s constitution, which mandates the
            effectively control costs and should be implemented, as they   state to promote health and involve the population in health
            can reduce deficits and mismanagement. Data from Rwanda’s   activities. Despite high membership coverage, Nyandekwe
            CBHI (2011/2012 – 2020/2021) supports the assertion that   et al. (2014) reported that only 2.17% of the 94% CBHI
            cost escalation occurred under the FFS PPM practice.  target population can afford the 10% co-payment for
                                                               specialized treatments, such as kidney transplants, costing
            4.5.1. Ghana
                                                               RWF 2 – 2.5 million. Without abolishing the co-payment
            Ghana, a low-middle-income country in West Africa,   scheme,  91.83%  of  CBHI  members  would  be  excluded,
            had a GDP per capita of USD 2,409 in 2020 (up from   raising concerns over government accountability.
            USD 1,779.89 in 2017) and per capita health spending of   To address this, we propose abolishing co-payments at
            USD 84.98. In 2005, Ghana launched the National Health   public/agreed health-care facilities, with CBHI reimbursing
            Insurance Scheme (NHIS) to promote UHC. While NHIS   costs via a third-party mechanism. This would ensure
            expanded health-care access, financial sustainability has   equal access to specialized care for all members. The CBHI
            been a concern, with the deficit rising from 4.8% in 2009   annual premium of RWF 3,000 (USD 2.56) accounts for
            to 23.7% in 2010 before dropping to 1.87% in 2012 after   3.2% reducing to 3% of the projected per capita health
            adopting the DRG payment policies. The NHIS attributed   expenditure of USD 81.17 for 2024/2025. Abolishing
            rising deficits to “moral hazards” and mismanagement,   co-payments would raise subsidized CBHI coverage
            prompting  cost-containment measures,  including  the   to 97%, enabling Rwanda’s health-care system – from
            capitation paid claims scheme. Health-care professionals   community health workers home-based care to tertiary
            have criticized the fairness of this payment method. During   hospital levels – to deliver nearly free care across all levels,
            the pilot phase of the “Mutuelles de santé” in Rwanda, many   ensuring universal access and protecting members from
            health-care providers opposed the capitation PPM, which   financial hardship.
            was ultimately rejected due to failing to cover the actual   Abolishing co-payments would increase CBHI
            costs of health services (Schneider and Diop, 2000).  member’s coverage to 96.8% (100% minus 3.2%) rounding

            4.5.2. Indonesia                                   to 97% and enable Rwanda’s health-care system – from
                                                               community health workers to tertiary hospitals – to
            Indonesia, a middle-income country in Southeast Asia,   provide nearly free primary, hospital, specialty, and super
            had a GDP per capita of USD 4,333 in 2020, with health   specialty care, ensuring universal access and shielding
            expenditures at USD 132.96 per capita. In 2014, Indonesia   members from financial hardship.
            launched the Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) program,
            covering 145 million people, with 86.4 million eligible for   Abolishing co-payments at primary health-care levels
            financial assistance. Despite promoting equity, actuarial   would reduce health-care costs for CBHI members,
            studies show that JKN’s per capita subsidy is insufficient   encourage timely visits, and prevent complications that
                                                               could result in costly hospital treatments. At hospitals, it
            to cover its costs. While the government adopted a   would  improve  access  to  expensive  care for  the  91.83%
            provider contracting system to address this, the financial   of members who cannot afford the 10% fee. In addition,
            gap remains, requiring higher contribution rates and cost-  maintaining a fixed CBHI premium rate until 2040/2041
            containment strategies.                            would protect members from catastrophic health expenses

            4.5.3. Thailand                                    and increase resilience against health-care shocks.
            Thailand, a UMIC, had a GDP per capita of USD 7,067 in   4.7. Limitations of the study
            2020, with a per capita health expenditure of USD 305.09.   While  the study did not survey Rwandan health
            Thailand achieved UHC through its Social Health Insurance   stakeholders on the proposed FASP PPM, it is known that
            program (1988 – 1997), funded by taxes, with no premiums   many health-care providers, including those in Rwanda,
            for beneficiaries. The government also provides benefits to   oppose the capitation PPM. Initially used in “Mutuelles
            civil servants through the Civil Servants Medical Benefit   de Santé,” the capitation PPM was later rejected due to its
            Scheme. Despite cost-control efforts such as capitation and   failure to cover the actual costs of health services (Schneider
            DRG systems, disparities remain between civil servants and   and Diop, 2000). While DRGs, widely used to reduce costs,
            other program participants, similar to issues seen in Rwanda’s   remain controversial (particularly in countries such as
            other private social health insurance institutions and CBHI.  Ghana), past resistance from health-care providers should


            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2025)                        268                       https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.5842
   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281