Page 66 - GPD-3-3
P. 66

Gene & Protein in Disease                                        Amino acid metabolism in neurodegeneration



            15.  Traxler  L,  Lagerwall  J,  Eichhorner  S,  et  al.   27.  Pickrell AM, Youle RJ. The roles of PINK1, parkin, and
               Metabolism navigates neural cell fate in development,   mitochondrial fidelity in Parkinson’s disease.  Neuron.
               aging  and  neurodegeneration.  Dis  Model  Mech.   2015;85(2):257-273.
               2021;14(3):dmm048993.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.007
               doi: 10.1242/dmm.048993
                                                               28.  Delamarre A, Meissner WG. Epidemiology, environmental
            16.  Tatapudy S, Aloisio F, Barber D, Nystul T. Cell fate decisions:   risk factors and genetics of Parkinson’s disease. Presse Med.
               Emerging roles for metabolic signals and cell morphology.   2017;46(2):175-181.
               EMBO Rep. 2017;18(12):2105-2118.                   doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2017.01.001
               doi: 10.15252/embr.201744816                    29.  Simon DK, Tanner  CM, Brundin P.  Parkinson disease

            17.  Spinelli JB, Haigis MC. The multifaceted contributions   epidemiology, pathology, genetics, and pathophysiology.
               of mitochondria to cellular metabolism.  Nat Cell Biol.   Clin Geriatr Med. 2020;36(1):1-12.
               2018;20(7):745-754.                                doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2019.08.002

               doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0124-1                  30.  Poewe W, Seppi K, Tanner CM, et al. Parkinson disease. Nat
            18.  Johnson MA, Vidoni S, Durigon R,  et al. Amino acid   Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17013.
               starvation has opposite effects on mitochondrial and      doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.13
               cytosolic protein synthesis. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e0093597.
                                                               31.  Evans SJW, Douglas I, Rawlins MD, Wexler NS, Tabrizi SJ,
               doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093597                  Smeeth L. Prevalence of adult Huntington’s disease in the
            19.  Grzegorski T, Losy J. Multiple sclerosis  -  the remarkable   UK based on diagnoses recorded in general practice records.
               story of a baffling disease. Rev Neurosci. 2019;30(5):511-526.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(10):1156-1160.
               doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2018-0074                    doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304636
            20.  Jamebozorgi K, Rostami D, Pormasoumi H, Taghizadeh E,   32.  Ross CA, Aylward EH, Wild EJ, et al. Huntington disease:
               Barreto  GE,  Sahebkar  A.  Epigenetic  aspects  of  multiple   Natural history, biomarkers and prospects for therapeutics.
               sclerosis and future therapeutic options.  Int  J  Neurosci.   Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(4):204-216.
               2021;131(1):56-64.                                 doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.24
               doi: 10.1080/00207454.2020.1732974              33.  Tabrizi SJ, Flower MD, Ross CA, Wild EJ. Huntington
            21.  Kumar G, Axtell RC. Dual role of b cells in multiple sclerosis.   disease: New insights into molecular pathogenesis and
               Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(3):2336.                    therapeutic opportunities.  Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(9):
                                                                  529-546.
               doi: 10.3390/ijms24032336
                                                                  doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-0389-4
            22.  Wingerchuk DM, Carter JL. Multiple sclerosis: Current
               and emerging disease-modifying therapies and treatment   34.  Weskamp  K,  Barmada  SJ.  TDP43  and  RNA  instability  in
               strategies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(2):225-240.    amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain Res. 2018;1693:67-74.
               doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.11.002                  doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.01.015
            23.  Vargas DL, Tyor WR. Update on disease-modifying therapies   35.  Chou CC, Zhang Y, Umoh ME,  et al. TDP-43 pathology
               for multiple sclerosis. J Investig Med. 2017;65(5):883-891.  disrupts  nuclear  pore  complexes  and  nucleocytoplasmic
                                                                  transport in ALS/FTD. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21(2):228-239.
               doi: 10.1136/jim-2016-000339
                                                                  doi: 10.1038/s41593-017-0047-3
            24.  Gouras GK, Olsson TT, Hansson O. β-Amyloid peptides and
               amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurotherapeutics.   36.  Steyaert J, Scheveneels W, Vanneste J,  et al. FUS-induced
               2015;12(1):3-11.                                   neurotoxicity in Drosophila is prevented by downregulating
                                                                  nucleocytoplasmic  transport proteins.  Hum Mol Genet.
               doi: 10.1007/s13311-014-0313-y                     2018;27(23):4103-4116.
            25.  Morris GP, Clark IA, Vissel B. Inconsistencies and      doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy303
               controversies  surrounding  the  amyloid  hypothesis  of   37.  Salameh JS, Brown RH, Berry JD. Amyotrophic lateral
               Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2014;2:135.
                                                                  sclerosis: Review. Semin Neurol. 2015;35(5):469-476.
               doi: 10.1186/s40478-014-0135-5
                                                                  doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1558984
            26.  Balestrino R, Schapira AHV. Parkinson disease. Eur J Neurol.   38.  Eelen G, de Zeeuw P, Treps L, Harjes U, Wong BW,
               2020;27(1):27-42.
                                                                  Carmeliet  P. Endothelial cell metabolism.  Physiol Rev.
               doi: 10.1111/ene.14108                             2018;98(1):3-58.


            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2024)                         12                              doi: 10.36922/gpd.3294
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71