Page 127 - GPD-4-1
P. 127

Gene & Protein in Disease                                     In silico insights on fisetin’s antidepressant effects



            Table 1. Physicochemical, pharmacokinetics, and    potential, positive regulation of neuron death, chemical
            drug‑likeness properties of FT                     synaptic transmission post-synaptic, and regulation of
                                                               neurotransmitter levels (Figure 3A). MF analysis showed
            PubChemID                              5281614     163 items, with the top five items being G protein-coupled
            Mol ID                                MOL013179    adenosine receptor activity, cholinesterase activity,
            Molecule Name                           Fisetin    sphingolipid floppase activity, monoamine oxidase
            Formula                               C15H10O6     activity, and tau-protein kinase activity (Figure 3B). The
            OB (%)                                  52.6       CC  analysis identified 103 items, with the leading five
            BBB                                     −0.69      being the protein kinase 5 complex, post-synaptic density,
            DL                                      0.24       axon, dendrite, and axolemma (Figure  3C). The results
            MW (g/mol)                              286.24     of the KEGG enrichment analysis detected a total of 101
                                                               signaling pathways with a significance level of P < 0.05,
            Hacc                                     6         among which the 10 most important pathways were as
            Hdon                                     4         follows: pathways in cancer, bladder cancer, diabetic
            Rbon                                     1         cardiomyopathy, cocaine addiction, drug metabolism,
            TPSA (Å)                                111.13     endocrine  resistance,  neuroactive  ligand-receptor
            Lipinski                                 Yes       interaction,  interleukin  (IL)-17  signaling  pathway,  AD,
            GIA                                     High       and Prostate cancer (Figure 3D).
            Log Kp (cm/s)                         −6.65 cm/s   3.5. Molecular docking
            BBB Permeant                             No        The docking analysis performed using CB-Dock2
            Abbreviations: OB: Oral availability; BBB: Blood-brain barrier;   demonstrated significant interactions between FT and five
            DL: Drug-likeness; MW: Molecular weight; Hacc: Number of
            H-bond acceptors; Hdon: Number of H-bond donors; Rbon: Number   target proteins, underscoring their crucial role in drug-
            of rotatable bonds; TPSA: Topological polar surface area;   disease interactions for the treatment of MDD. The updated
            Log Kp: Logarithm of permeability coefficient; GIA: Gastrointestinal   results reveal that FT exhibits high binding affinities with
            absorption.                                        the following proteins: GSK3B, with a Vina score of −8.4;
                                                               MAOA, with a Vina score of −10.2; ACHE, with a Vina
            3.3. PPI of FT                                     score of −9.2; MMP9, with a Vina score of −8.3; and MPO,
            Utilizing the STRING database, PPI analysis was carried   with a Vina score of −10.2. These findings highlight FT’s
            out to identify the FT targets in the context of treating   potential as a therapeutic agent in MDD treatment through
            MDD, (Figure  2A). A  total of 17 target proteins were   its interactions with these key targets. In comparison, the
            examined, and the resulting data were input into Cytoscape   established antidepressant fluoxetine (FLX) shows varying
            for topological analysis of the constructed PPI network. To   binding affinities across the same targets, with Vina scores
            measure the significance of nodes within this network, we   of −7.7 for GSK3B, −9.0 for MAOA, −10.0 for ACHE, −8.5
            utilized the CytoNCA application to select the top genes   for MMP9, and −8.0 for MPO. Notably, FT demonstrates
            (Figures 2B and C). Through this comprehensive analysis,   superior binding affinities, particularly with MAOA and
            we successfully identified 10 critical target proteins as follows:   MPO, suggesting that it may offer a competitive advantage
            glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3B), monoamine   in targeting these proteins compared to FLX. This
            oxidase A (MAOA), acetylcholinesterase (ACHE), matrix   comparative analysis not only emphasizes FT’s therapeutic
            metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), myeloperoxidase (MPO),   potential but also provides a clearer evaluation of its
            xanthine dehydrogenase (XDH), matrix metalloproteinase   efficacy in the context of existing treatments for MDD
            2 (MMP2), adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette sub-  (Figure 4 and Table A1).
            family B member 1 (ABCB1), cyclin-dependent kinase
            5 (CDK5), and CDK5 regulatory subunit  1 (CDK5R1)   4. Discussion
            (Figure 2C and detailed in Table 2).               MDD is a complex condition linked to numerous
                                                               physiological  disturbances,  including  heightened
            3.4. Molecular mechanisms of FT                    neuroinflammation.  Growing  research  points  to
            We performed GO and KEGG analyses to identify the   inflammatory pathways, especially the nuclear factor kappa
            possible  molecular  mechanisms  underlying  FT’s  effects   B (NF-κB) pathway, as key contributors to the development
            in the treatment of MDD. The BP analysis revealed a total   of MDD. 15,30  In individuals with MDD, increased levels of
            of 1,000 items, highlighting the top five components,   proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1 beta,
            namely, response to amyloid-beta, excitatory post-synaptic   interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα),


            Volume 4 Issue 1 (2025)                         5                               doi: 10.36922/gpd.4846
   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132