Page 107 - GTM-2-1
P. 107

Global Translational Medicine                                       GalNAc AGT ASO reduce atherosclerosis






                         A                    B                         C













                         D                                            E













            Figure 4. Effects of hepatocyte-specific antisense oligonucleotides of angiotensinogen versus losartan on renin, systolic blood pressure, and atherosclerotic
            lesion size. (A) Plasma renin concentration (PRC); N = 10 per group. (B) Renal renin mRNA abundance by quantitative polymerase chain reaction;
            N = 6 per group. (C) Systolic blood pressure (BP) at week 7. (D) En face aortic images; scale bar = 1 mm. (E) Atherosclerotic lesion area in the thoracic
            aorta; N = 10 per group.
            AngI: Angiotensin I; GalNAc AGT ASO: N-acetylgalactosamine-conjugated antisense oligonucleotides targeting angiotensinogen; PBS: Phosphate-
            buffered saline.


            risk factor for atherosclerosis, there is a growing body of   It is important to note that mice, unlike humans,
            evidence suggesting that BP per se does not contribute to   display a very high turnover of AGT, reflected by lower
            atherosclerosis . The different magnitudes of suppressing   plasma AGT concentrations than in humans. Hence, the
                       [23]
            AGT versus blocking AT1 receptor on BP and atherosclerosis   des(AngI)AGT/intact AGT ratio is higher in mice than
            in this study support this notion. Overall, this study   in humans [26] . Although administration of losartan did
            unequivocally shows that BP regulation and atherosclerosis   not affect AGT and liver steatosis in the present study,
            in hypercholesterolemic LDL receptor mice are dependent   earlier studies have reported suppression of liver steatosis
                                         -/- 
            on AngII generated from AGT of hepatic origin, thereby   in mice administered with RAS inhibitors [27-29] . This may
            agreeing with the observations made in mice displaying   reflect a different and larger degree of renin-angiotensin
            genetic hepatocyte-specific AGT deficiency [8,24,25] .
                                                               blockade, potentially lowering AGT [30]  and/or affecting
              Remarkably, GalNAc AGT ASO, but not losartan,    the des(AngI)AGT/intact AGT ratio. The molecular
            reduced Western diet-induced liver steatosis, which   mechanism underlying the direct effect of des(AngI)
            was manifested as increased cholesterol and triglyceride   AGT is unknown. It may involve interference with the
            content in the liver. This finding is consistent with our   protein kinase B (Akt)/mammalian target of rapamycin
            previous studies in hepAGT mice [8,19] . These effects   (mTOR)/sterol responsive element-binding protein
                                     -/- 
            occurred in a dose-independent manner and likely                        [19]
            represent the direct consequence of lowering AGT, which   1c (SREBP-1c) pathway  , which is associated with
            occurred  following  GalNAc  AGT  ASO  administration.   liver steatosis and suppressed in mice with hepatocyte-
            Indeed, the expression of des(AngI)AGT induced liver   specific deletion of AGT. It is also unknown whether
            steatosis in hepatocyte-specific AGT deficient mice fed a   intact AGT exerts similar effects. Studying this would
            Western diet . Given the liver-specific activity of GalNAc   require the AAV-induced expression of intact AGT
                      [8]
            AGT ASO , we would expect non-hepatic AGT to have   in  hepAGT mice  under  complete  renin-angiotensin
                                                                         -/- 
                    [14]
            no effect on liver steatosis.                      blockade.

            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2023)                         7                         https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.288
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112