Page 91 - GTM-2-3
P. 91

Global Translational Medicine                                           HPLC-UV lacosamide quantification




            Table 3. Summary of patient plasma levels of lacosamide
            Subjects  Body mass index (Kg/m )  Gender  Response to treatment  Daily dose (mg/day)  Pre‑ or post‑dose  Level (ug/ml)
                                     2
            1.              35.4        Female     Resistant               500       Pre               9.1
                                                                                     Post              13.5
            2.              22.6        Female     Responsive              200       Pre               8.1
                                                                                     Post              13.8
            3.              32.3        Male       Resistant               400       Pre               8.9
                                                                                     Post              13.4
            4.              23.7        Male       Resistant               400       Pre               3.6
                                                                                     Post              5.4
            5.              27.6        Male       Responsive              500       Pre               12.5
                                                                                     Post              13.6


            4. Discussion                                      which is crucial in assessing adherence, potential interactions,
                                                               suspected treatment failure, or subtherapeutic responses
            Therapeutic drug monitoring services for AEDs remain   resulting from variations in the drug’s pharmacokinetics or
            limited in  many  countries,  both  in  public  and  private   pharmacodynamics. In addition, the wide range allows the
            institutions. Therefore, the development of a simple,   study of lacosamide’s pharmacokinetic behavior in treated
            reliable,  and  cost-effective  quantitative  method  could   patients  and  the  assessment  of  concentration-response
            improve accessibility for local laboratories and facilitate   variability across diverse populations.
            therapeutic optimization.
                                                                 The stability study revealed that the unprocessed
              While there are publications on HPLC-mass and    sample maintains its integrity for up to 1 month at −20°C
            UHPLC approaches , the use of HPLC-UV is both cost-  or 2 years at −80°C. Once processed, the sample exhibited
                            [21]
            effective and practical. However, previously published   excellent stability even at room temperature, allowing for
            methodologies lacked reproducibility, necessitating the   reanalysis if necessary. However, it does not withstand
            development of a novel approach. Some reported methods   more than two cycles of freezing at −80°C (never at −20°C)
            involve protein precipitation for deproteinization [10,22,23] ,   and subsequent thawing. These findings provide valuable
            but a satisfactory recovery of the analyte within the clinical   insights for working under good laboratory practice
            range was only achieved through solvent extraction.
                                                               conditions. This involves considering not only sample care
              Propranolol, serving as an internal standard, is an   but also the well-being of routine patients participating in
            affordable drug widely available for purchase. It has proven   clinical research.
            to be useful not only for this lacosamide method but also   While it continues to be a topic of discussion, the
            for analyzing other anticonvulsants in our laboratory.
                                                                           [5]
                                                               previous works  have suggested that a minimum plasma
              The method presented here demonstrated specificity,   level (trough level) of 10  ug/ml is required to ensure
            as no interferences were found under  matrix conditions   clinical efficacy. The methodology used in the present study
            (normal plasma, hemolyzed plasma, hyperlipemic     successfully detected clinically useful therapeutic levels. As
            plasma, etc.) or in the presence of commonly used drugs   expected, non-responder patients exhibited blood levels
            (diclofenac, ibuprofen, etc.) or other anticonvulsants. This   below the therapeutic range. It was also noteworthy that a
            outcome is particularly desirable given the variations in   patient classified as a responder achieved therapeutic effects
            patient treatments and individual circumstances.   with lower trough levels than the recommended threshold.
              The linearity of the method was verified within the   Despite the small sample size, which was primarily aimed
            concentration  range  of  2.5  –  30.0  µg/ml  for  lacosamide,   at assessing the method’s utility, these results highlight
            which encompasses the clinically relevant concentration   the importance of establishing blood drug monitoring
            range (10 – 20  µg/mL). In this model, 99.70% of the   protocols  to  optimize  lacosamide  therapy.  Furthermore,
            variation in the area ratio was accounted for by variations in   this approach will enable a deeper understanding of the
            lacosamide concentration. The total coefficient of variation   prerequisites necessary to ensure its clinical efficacy and its
            of the response factors met the specifications, and a LOD of   behavior in diverse populations.
            0.69 µg/ml was achieved. This level of sensitivity enables the   Therefore, this analytical methodology is a useful tool
            quantification of lacosamide levels below the reference range,   with the potential for future adaptation to determine


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2023)                         9                        https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.1265
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96