Page 78 - GTM-2-4
P. 78

Global Translational Medicine                                    Open carpal tunnel release surgical outcomes



            5. Conclusion                                      References

            The treatment of CTS is always aimed at attaining a   1.   Ibrahim I, Khan W, Goddard N, et al., 2012, Carpal tunnel
            significant reduction in CTS symptoms postoperatively.   syndrome: A review of the recent literature. Open Orthop J,
            While the etiology of CTS may be multifactorial and   6: 69–76.
            attributable to different factors, our study did not reveal      https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001206010069
            any statistically significant relationship between BMI   2.   Sevy JO, Varacallo M, 2022, Carpal tunnel syndrome. In:
            and postoperative complications. However, a significant   Statpearls. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
            association was observed between the severity of NCS   books/NBK448179 [Last accessed on 2022 Dec 28].
            and post-operative complications. Our results indicated   3.   Alimohammadi E, Bagheri SR, Hadidi H, et al., 2020, Carpal
            positive clinical outcomes, underscoring the strong   tunnel surgery: Predictors of clinical outcomes and patients’
            recommendation for the use of OCTR methods in the     satisfaction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 21: 51.
            treatment of CTS.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3082-2
            Acknowledgments                                    4.   Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Clinical Manifestations and

            None.                                                 Diagnosis, 2022, UpToDate. Available from: https://www.
                                                                  uptodate.com/contents/carpal-tunnel-syndrome-clinical-
            Funding                                               manifestations-and-diagnosis/print [Last accessed on
                                                                  2022 Dec 28].
            None.
                                                               5.   Habib R, Alam D, Islam RN, et al., 2016, Electrophysiological
            Conflict of interest                                  grading to assess the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome
                                                                  in symptomatic diabetic patients.  Bangladesh J Neurosci,
            The authors declare that they have no competing interests.  32: 98–105.
            Author contributions                                  https://doi.org/10.3329/bjn.v32i2.57447
                                                               6.   Carpal  Tunnel  Syndrome  -  Symptoms  and  Causes,  2022,
            Conceptualization: Mohamed Gwila,Mostafa Ebshina      Mayo Clinic.  Available  from: https://www.mayoclinic.org/
            Formal analysis: Mostafa Ebshina, Moniruddin Chowdhury  diseases-conditions/carpal-tunnel-syndrome/symptoms-
            Investigation: Mohamed Gwila,Mostafa Ebshina, Syeda   causes/syc-20355603 [Last accessed on 2022 Dec 28].
               Humayra                                         7.   Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Fact Sheet, 2022, National
            Methodology: Mohamed Gwila                            Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Available
            Writing – original draft: Mohamed Gwila               from: https://www.ninds.nih.gov/carpal-tunnel-syndrome-
            Writing – review & editing: Syeda Humayra, Moniruddin   fact-sheet [Last accessed on 2022 Dec 30].
               Chowdhury
                                                               8.   Chung KC, 2006, Current status of outcomes research in
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            carpal tunnel surgery. Hand, 1: 9–13.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-006-0002-3
            The study followed the ethical protocols in accordance
            with the Helsinki’s Declaration, 2013 revision. The study   9.   Faucher GK, Daruwalla JH, Seiler JG, 2017, Complications
            has been approved by the Scientific Research and Ethics   of surgical release\break of carpal tunnel syndrome:
            Committee at Zliten Hospital in Libya (Approval ID:   A systematic review. J Surg Orthop Adv, 26: 18–24.
            ZHEC-2015/1209-038).                               10.  Li Y, Luo W, Wu G, et al., 2020, Open versus endoscopic
                                                                  carpal tunnel release: A systematic review and meta-analysis
            Consent for publication                               of randomized controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord,
                                                                  21: 272.
            All patients were informed about the study, and their data
            confidentiality was ensured. The patients were not exposed to      https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03306-1
            any harmful events or potential risks throughout this study.   11.  Wong KC, Hung LK, Ho PC,  et al., 2003, Carpal tunnel
            Permission was obtained from patients both verbally and   release. A  prospective, randomised study of endoscopic
            in the form of written informed consent. No experimental   versus limited-open methods. J Bone Joint Surg, 85: 863–868.
            intervention took place during or after the study.     https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.85B6.13759
            Availability of data                               12.  Michelotti BM, Vakharia KT, Romanowsky D, et al., 2020,
                                                                  A prospective, randomized trial comparing open and
            Data can be obtained from corresponding author following   endoscopic carpal tunnel release within the same patient.
            formal request.                                       Hand (N Y), 15: 322–326.


            Volume 2 Issue 4 (2023)                         8                        https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.1019
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83