Page 57 - IJAMD-2-2
P. 57

International Journal of AI for
            Materials and Design                                           ML-driven optimization in additive manufacturing


               ferromagnetic domains for untethered fast-transforming   76.  Tan L, Huang T, Liu J, Li Q, Wu X. Deep adversarial learning
               soft materials. Nature. 2018;558(7709):274-279.    system for fault diagnosis in fused deposition modeling with
                                                                  imbalanced data. Comput Ind Eng. 2023;176:108887.
               doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0185-0
            66.  Kim SH, Yeon YK, Lee JM,  et al. Precisely printable and      doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108887
               biocompatible silk fibroin bioink for digital light processing   77.  Zhai C, Wang J, Tu YP, Chang G, Ren X, Ding C. Robust
               3D printing. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1620.           optimization of 3D printing process parameters considering
               doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03759-y                    process stability and production efficiency.  Addit Manuf.
                                                                  2023;71:103588.
            67.  Madrid‐Wolff J, Boniface A, Loterie D, Delrot P, Moser C.
               Controlling  light  in scattering  materials  for volumetric      doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2023.103588
               additive manufacturing. Adv Sci. 2022;9(22):2105144.  78.  Kantaros A, Karalekas D. Fiber Bragg grating based
               doi: 10.1002/advs.202105144                        investigation of residual strains in ABS parts fabricated by
                                                                  fused deposition modeling process. Mater Des. 2013;50:44-50.
            68.  Mu Q, Wang L, Dunn CK, et al. Digital light processing 3D
               printing of conductive complex structures.  Addit Manuf.      doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.067
               2017;18:74-83.                                  79.  Delli U, Chang S. Automated process monitoring in 3D
               doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.08.011                   printing using supervised machine learning.  Procedia
                                                                  Manuf. 2018;26:865-870.
            69.  Peng X, Kuang X, Roach DJ,  et al. Integrating digital
               light processing with direct ink writing for hybrid 3D      doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.111
               printing of functional structures and devices. Addit Manuf.   80.  Khan MF, Alam A, Siddiqui MA,  et al. Real-time defect
               2021;40:101911.                                    detection in 3D printing using machine learning.  Mater
               doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.101911                   Today Proc. 2021;42:521-528.
            70.  Patel DK, Sakhaei AH, Layani M, Zhang B, Ge Q,      doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.482
               Magdassi S. Highly stretchable and UV curable elastomers   81.  Fu Y, Downey A, Yuan L, Pratt A, Balogun  Y.  In situ
               for digital light processing based 3D printing. Adv Mater.   monitoring for fused filament fabrication process: A review.
               2017;29(15):1606000.                               Addit Manuf. 2021;38:101749.
               doi: 10.1002/adma.201606000                        doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101749
            71.  Kelly BE, Bhattacharya I, Heidari H, Shusteff M,   82.  Jin Z, Zhang Z, Gu GX. Autonomous in-situ correction of
               Spadaccini  CM,  Taylor  HK.  Volumetric  additive   fused deposition modeling printers using computer vision
               manufacturing via tomographic reconstruction.  Science.   and deep learning. Manuf Lett. 2019;22:11-15.
               2019;363(6431):1075-1079.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.mfglet.2019.09.005
               doi: 10.1126/science.aau7114
                                                               83.  Westphal E, Seitz H. Machine learning for the intelligent
            72.  Han D, Farino C, Yang C, et al. Soft robotic manipulation   analysis of 3D printing conditions using environmental
               and locomotion with a 3D printed electroactive hydrogel.   sensor data to support quality assurance.  Addit Manuf.
               ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(21):17512-17518.  2022;50:102535.
               doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b04250                        doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102535
            73.  Sapkota A, Ghimire SK, Adanur S. A  review on fused   84.  Nasrin T, Pourkamali‐Anaraki F, Peterson AM. Application
               deposition modeling (FDM)-based additive manufacturing   of  machine learning in  polymer additive  manufacturing:
               (AM) methods, materials and applications for flexible fabric   A review. J Polym Sci. 2024;62(12):2639-2669.
               structures. J Ind Text. 2024;54:1-51.
                                                                  doi: 10.1002/pol.20230649
               doi: 10.1177/15280837241282110
                                                               85.  Jin Z, Zhang Z, Shao X, Gu GX. Monitoring anomalies in
            74.  Garg A, Bhattacharya A. An insight to the failure of FDM   3D bioprinting with deep neural networks. ACS Biomater
               parts under tensile loading: Finite element analysis and   Sci Eng. 2021;9(7):3945-3952.
               experimental study. Int J Mech Sci. 2017;120:225-236.
                                                                  doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01761
               doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.11.032
                                                               86.  Chen H, Liu Y, Balabani S, Hirayama R, Huang J. Machine
            75.  Jin Z, Zhang Z, Gu GX. Automated real‐time detection   learning  in  predicting  printable  biomaterial  formulations
               and prediction of interlayer imperfections in additive
               manufacturing processes using artificial intelligence.  Adv   for direct ink writing. Research (Wash D C). 2023;6:0197.
               Intell Syst. 2020;2(1):1900130.                    doi: 10.34133/research.0197
               doi: 10.1002/aisy.201900130                     87.  Valizadeh I, Tayyarian T, Weeger O. Influence of process


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                         51                        doi: 10.36922/IJAMD025130010
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62