Page 61 - IJAMD-2-2
P. 61

International Journal of AI for
            Materials and Design                                           ML-driven optimization in additive manufacturing


               doi: 10.1080/17452759.2023.2251453                 reinforced poly-lactic acid composites. Prog Addit Manuf.
            153. Cai Y, Wang Y, Chen H, Xiong J. Searching optimal process   2024;10:2585-2599.
               parameters for desired layer geometry in wire-laser directed      doi: 10.1007/s40964-024-00768-w
               energy deposition based on machine learning. Virtual Phys
               Prototyp. 2024;19(1):e2352066.                  163. Yi J,  Deng B,  Peng F,  et  al. Study  on the parameters
                                                                  optimization of 3D printing continuous carbon fiber-
               doi: 10.1080/17452759.2024.2352066                 reinforced composites based on CNN and NSGA-II. Compos
            154. Pulido-Victoria  LA, Flores-Tlacuahuac A, Panales-  Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2025;190:108657.
               Pérez A., Lara-Ceniceros TE, Ávila-López MA, Bonilla-     doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108657
               Cruz J. Prediction of viscoelastic and printability properties
               on binder-free TiO2-based ceramic pastes by DIW   164. Zhang Z, Shi J, Yu T, et al. Predicting flexural strength of
               through a machine learning approach. Comput Chem Eng.   additively manufactured continuous carbon fiber-reinforced
               2025;193:108920.                                   polymer composites using machine learning. J Comput Inf
                                                                  Sci Eng. 2020;20(6):061015.
               doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108920
                                                                  doi: 10.1115/1.4047477
            155. Chen W, Zou B, Zheng Q, Huang C, Li L, Liu J. Research
               on  anti-interference  detection  of  3D-printed  ceramics   165. Raj R, Mahato S, Moharana AP, Dixit AR. Predicting
               surface defects based on deep learning.  Ceram Int.   dimensional accuracy in 3D printed polydimethylsiloxane-
               2023;49(13):22479-22491.                           carbon nanotubes composites via machine learning. Polym
                                                                  Compos. 2024;45(4):2965-2980.
               doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.04.081
                                                                  doi: 10.1002/pc.27963
            156. Chen  W,  Zou  B,  Huang  C,  et al.  The  defect  detection  of
               3D-printed ceramic curved surface parts with low contrast   166. Yang H,  Fang L,  Yuan Z,  et al. Machine learning guided
               based on deep learning. Ceram Int. 2023;49(2):2881-2893.  3D printing of carbon microlattices with customized
                                                                  performance for supercapacitive energy storage.  Carbon.
               doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.09.272
                                                                  2023;201:408-414.
            157. Zhou J, Li L, Lu L, Cheng Y. Machine learning-based quality
               optimisation of ceramic extrusion 3D printing deposition      doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.08.083
               lines. Mater Today Commun. 2024;41:110841.      167. Poompiew N, Sukmas W, Aumnate C,  et al. Strain
                                                                  sensing characteristics of 3D-printed carbon nanotubes/
               doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110841
                                                                  polypyrrole/UV-curable  composites:  Experimental
            158. Nohut S, Schwentenwein M. Machine learning assisted   validation and machine learning predictions.  Prog Addit
               material development for lithography-based additive   Manuf. 2025;10(1):581-591.
               manufacturing of porous alumina ceramics. Open Ceram.
               2024;18:100573.                                    doi: 10.1007/s40964-024-00642-9
               doi: 10.1016/j.oceram.2024.100573               168. Maurya D, Khaleghian S, Sriramdas R,  et al. 3D printed
                                                                  graphene-based self-powered strain sensors for smart tires
            159. Tang J, Geng X, Li D,  et al. Machine learning-based   in autonomous vehicles. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5392.
               microstructure prediction during laser sintering of alumina.
               Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):10724.                         doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19088-y
               doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89816-x                 169. Zhu J, Cho M, Li Y, et al. Machine learning-enabled textile-
                                                                  based graphene gas sensing with energy harvesting-assisted
            160. Saimon AI, Yangue E, Yue X, Kong Z, Liu C. Advancing   IoT application. Nano Energy. 2021;86:106035.
               additive  manufacturing  through  deep  learning:
               A  comprehensive review of current progress and future      doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106035
               challenges. IISE Trans. 2025:1-24.              170. Kwon YT, Kim YS, Kwon S, et al. All-printed nanomembrane
               doi: 10.1080/24725854.2024.2443592                 wireless bioelectronics using a biocompatible solderable
                                                                  graphene for multimodal human-machine interfaces.  Nat
            161. Chen Q, Zhang W, Liang X, et al. Machine learning-assisted   Commun. 2020;11(1):3450.
               multi-property prediction and sintering mechanism
               exploration of mullite-corundum ceramics.  Materials.      doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17288-0
               2025;18(6):1384.                                171. Hou Y, Gao M, Gao J, et al. 3D printed conformal strain
               doi: 10.3390/ma18061384                            and humidity sensors for human motion prediction
                                                                  and health monitoring via machine learning.  Adv Sci.
            162. Raj T, Tiwary A, Jain A,  et al. Machine learning-assisted   2023;10(36):2304132.
               prediction  modeling  for  anisotropic  flexural  strength
               variations in fused filament fabrication of  graphene      doi: 10.1002/advs.202304132


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                         55                        doi: 10.36922/IJAMD025130010
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66