Page 91 - IJB-10-2
P. 91

International Journal of Bioprinting                       3D-printed nanocomposites: Synthesis & applications




            Table 1. Comparison of the four bioprinting approaches

             Specification    Inkjet            Laser-assisted      Light-induced     Microextrusion-based  Ref
             Principle        Electrical heating or   Applying an energized pulsed  UV-initiated curing   Extrusion of pre-gel   29-39
                              piezoelectric actuation  laser on target or ribbons and  of the liquid photo-  solution through a
                                                being deposited over metal   responsive materials on   needle and build up
                                                substrates.         the build stage   layer-by-layer
             Resolution       85–300 μm         > 5 μm              > 25 μm           100 μm–10 mm
             Gelation         Fast; chemical    Fast; chemical, photo-  Fast; chemical, photo-  Medium; chemical
                              crosslinking.     crosslinking        crosslinking      crosslinking, shear-
                                                                                      thinning, temperature
             Dispensing speed  Fast (1–10,000   Medium-fast         Fast, chemical    Slow (10 μm–50 mm/s)
                              droplets/s)       (200–1600 mm/s)     crosslinking
             Material viscosity  3.5–12 mPa·s   1–300 mPa·s         1–300 mPa·s       30–6 × 10  mPa·s
                                                                                            7
             Cell density     Low (<10  cells/mL)  Medium, 10 cells/mL  Medium, 10 cells/mL  High, cell spheroids
                                                                            8
                                                        8
                                     6
             Cell viability   >85%              >95%                >90%              40–80%
             Advantages       •  Low-cost, simple   •  High resolution  •  Low cost   •  Bioinks with wide
                                system          •  High cell viability  •  High resolution  range of viscosity
                              •  High resolution  •  Good vertical fidelity  •  Fast bioprinting   •  High cell density
                              •  Fast printing speed                  speeds          •  Simple system
                              •  High cell viability                •  High cell viability  •  Multiple composition
                                                                    •  Fair vertical fidelity  •  Feasibility
             Disadvantages    •  Limited availability   •  Complex system  •  Moderately complex   •  Low to moderate cell
                                of bioinks with low to   •  Expensive  system           viability
                                medium viscosities   •  Medium bioprinting   •  Bioink limited to   •  Slow bioprinting speed
                              •  Low cell density   speed             photo-polymerization   •  Moderate resolution
                              •  Mostly applied to 2D  •  Medium on cell density  crosslinking
                                                                    •  Medium on cell density


            movement with a three-axis motion control system   coaxial needles were first adopted by Ozbolat et al. in 3D
            to build 3D layer objects. In the traditional extrusion-  bioprinting to fabricate micro-fluidic channels. 40-42  The
            based printing technique, the plastic filament is extruded   bioink is injected through the exterior needle, while the
            through a high-temperature extruder, and the melted   crosslinking agent is extruded through the interior needle,
            plastic solidified once extruded and quickly bound to   leaving stand-alone perfusable vessels. The commonly
                             25
            the previous layers.  Microextrusion bioprinter with   used bioink and crosslinking agent for coaxial printing
            syringes was created based on the general concept of fused   are alginate composite and CaCl  solution. 41,43,44  Sacrificial
                                                                                         2
            deposition modeling (FDM) printer. This strategy is very   bioprinting, a “removable” bioink deposited in a matrix
            popular in tissue engineering owing to its advantages   via microextrusion bioprinting which was followed by
            such as ease of operation, availability of inks with a wide   matrix curing and sacrificial ink removal, 45,46  was first
                                                                                    47
            range of viscosities, multiple crosslinking methods, and   demonstrated by Wu et al.  This method could be utilized
            high cell loading density. 26-28  To create 3D architectures,   for fabricating 3D interconnected wall-less channels. Similar
            biomaterials are loaded into the syringe and extruded via a   to sacrificial bioprinting, embedded extrusion bioprinting
            pneumatical (Figure 1e) or mechanical-driven (Figure 1f)   was developed to fabricate heterogeneous complex 3D
            system.  Inks with a viscosity between 30 mPa·s and 60   tissue with biomaterials in high resolution, 48,49  where the
                  14
            kPa·s can be readily extruded via a pneumatic system,   bioinks are extruded into a supporting matrix, composed
                                                                                                          51
                                                                         48
                                                                                    50
            whereas high-viscosity bioinks of greater than 60 kPa·s   of elastomer,  viscous oil,  granular gel suspension,  or
                                                                                 52
            can be better extruded via a mechanically driven system. A   self-healing hydrogels,  which is removed afterward.
            systematic consideration should be given to the pressure,   The supporting bath material should, in general,
            movement speed, extrusion flow rates, needle size, and   behave like Bingham plastic that is rigid at low shear
            layer heights in order to ensure an optimal resolution.
                                                               forces but flexible when it reaches high shear stresses. 27,49
               Inspired by the concept of using a coaxial spinneret   Suitable yield stress smooths needle movement and
            to fabricate hollow nanofilaments in electrospinning,   supports printed constructions. Supporting bath yield

            Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024)                        83                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1637
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96