Page 29 - IJB-3-1

William Whitford and James B. Hoying

6. Conclusion for 3D bioprinting. ACS Biomaterials Science and Engi-
neering, vol.2(10): 1662–1678.
Bioprinting of vascularized tissues has demanded a http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00088
harmonization of diverse technologies, equipment 8. Sundaramurthi D, Rauf S, and Hauser C, 2016, 3D bio-
and materials [38] . Multi-matrix material bioinks are be- printing technology for regenerative medicine applica-
ing developed meeting each structural, biologic and tions. International Journal of Bioprinting, vol.2(2): 9–26.
regulatory requirement [39] . Multimodal printers can http://ijb.whioce.com/index.php/int-j-bioprinting/article/v
deposit with high speed, mass and resolution [40] . No- iew/78
vel algorithms and software package guide the depo- 9. Whitford W G and Hoying J B, 2016, A bioink by any
sition of neovessels of various sources printed into sy- other name: Terms, concepts and constructions related to
nthetic networks designed to mature into a contiguous 3D bioprinting. Future Science OA, vol.2(3): FSO133.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4155/fsoa-2016-0044
network of arterioles, capillaries, and venules. Digital 10. Jang J, Kim T G, Kim B S, et al., 2016, Tailoring me-
biomanufacturing promises continuity and optimiza- chanical properties of decellularized extracellular ma-
tion of tissue printing operations by insuring real-time trix bioink by vitamin B2-induced photo-crosslinking.
access to the required information through high-dem- Acta Biomaterialia, vol.33: 88–95.
and calculations upon rich, timely data. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.013
11. Pati F, Jang J, Ha D H, et al., 2014, Printing three-dim-
Conflict of Interest and Funding ensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellu-

No conflict of interest was reported by all authors. lar matrix bioink. Nature Communications, vol.5: 3935.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4935
References 12. Ghosh S, Parker S T, Wang X, et al., 2008, Direct-write
assembly of microperiodic silk fibroin scaffolds for tissue
1. Rouse M, 2016, Definition: digital manufacturing, Tech- engineering applications. Advanced Functional Materials,
Target, viewed November 3, 2016, vol.18(13): 1883–1889.
<http://searchmanufacturingerp.Techtarget.Com/definitio http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200800040
n/digital-manufacturing> 13. Organovo Holdings Inc., 2016, Science and technology,
2. Todorovic MH, Datta R, Stevanovic L, et al,. 2016, Pro- viewed November 14, 2016,
ceedings of PCIM Europe 2016; International Exhibition <http://organovo.com/science-technology/>
and Conference for Power Electronics, Intelligent Motion, 14. Whitford W G, 2016, Conference of Bioprinting and 3D
Renewable Energy and Energy Management, May 10–12, Printing in the Life Sciences, July 21–22, 2016: Bioinks
2016: Design and testing of a modular SiC based pow- supporting angiogenic potential in organ printing.
er block. Nuremberg, Germany. pp. 1–4. <https://selectbiosciences.Com/conferences/agendaabstra
<http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7499578/> cts.Aspx?Conf=bio3d&abstractid=11535>
3. Fan H and Scott C, 2015, From chips to CHO cells: IT 15. Armstrong J P K, Burke M, Carter B M, et al., 2016,
advances in upstream bioprocessing, BioProcess Interna- 3D bioprinting using a templated porous bioink. Ad-
tional, viewed November 11, 2016, vanced Healthcare Materials, vol.5(14): 1724–1730.
<http://www.Bioprocessintl.Com/manufacturing/informat http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600022
ion-technology/from-chips-to-cho-cells-it-advances-in-up 16. Alakpa E V, Jayawarna V, Lampel A, et al., 2016, Tuna-
stream-bioprocessing/> ble supramolecular hydrogels for selection of lineage-
4. National Science Foundation, 2013, NSF workshop re- guiding metabolites in stem cell cultures. Chem, vol.1(2):
port – advanced biomanufacturing, viewed November 5, 298–319.
2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2016.07.001
<http://www.nsf.gov/eng/cbet/documents/adv_biomanufa 17. Patel P, 2016, The path to printed body parts — scientists
cturing.pdf> are making steady progress toward 3-D printed tissues
5. Stackpole B, 2016, 3D printing a key piece of digital and organs. ACS Central Science, vol.2(9): 581–583.
manufacturing puzzle, TechTarget, viewed November 13, https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.6b00269
2016, 18. Advanced Solutions Inc., n.d., BioAssemblyBot™, view-
<http://searchmanufacturingerp.techtarget.com/feature/3 ed November 1, 2016,
D-printing-a-key-piece-of-digital-manufacturing-puzzle> <http://www.lifesciences.solutions/bioprinters.html#more>
6. TSIM® software, n.d., viewed November 12, 2016, 19. Zorlutuna P, Annabi N, Camci-Unal G, et al., 2012, Mi-
<http://www.lifesciences.solutions/tsim-software.html> crofabricated biomaterials for engineering 3D tissues.
7. Jose R R, Rodriguez M J, Dixon T A, et al., 2016, Evolu- Advanced Materials, vol.24(14): 1782–1804.
tion of bioinks and additive manufacturing technologies https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201104631
International Journal of Bioprinting (2017)–Volume 3, Issue 1 25