Page 90 - IJB-3-1
P. 90

Roles of support materials in 3D bioprinting — Present and future

            in  order  to  scale  up  beyond  micro-level,  further  im-  pendence  of  microstructure  and  microhardness  for  se-
            provements  in  materials  research  such  as  new  bio-   lective  electron  beam-melted  Ti–6Al–4V  parts.  Virtual
            composite material or novel derived natural materials   and Physical Prototyping, vol.11: 183–191.
            for  both  model  and  support  materials  for  bioprinters   https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1210483
            are needed.                                         8.   Ozbolat I T and Hospodiuk M, 2016, Current advances
                                                                    and  future  perspectives  in  extrusion-based  bioprinting.
            Conflict of Interest and Funding                        Biomaterials, vol.76: 321–343.
                                                                    https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076
            No conflict of interest was reported by the authors.     9.   Murphy S V, Skardal A and Atala A, 2013, Evaluation of
            Acknowledgements                                        hydrogels for bio-printing applications. Journal of Bio-
                                                                    medical Materials Research Part A, vol.101A: 272–284.
            Singapore  Centre  for  3D  Printing  (SC3DP)  is  sup-  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34326
            ported  by  the  Singapore  National  Research  Founda-  10.  Kucukgul C, Ozler S B, Inci I, et al., 2015, 3D bioprint-
            tion (NRF).                                             ing  of bi omimetic  aortic  vascular  constructs  with  self‐
                                                                    supporting  cells.  Biotechnology  and Bioengineering,
            References                                              vol.112: 811–821.
                                                                    https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25493
              1.   Murphy S  V, Atala A, 2014, 3D  bioprinting  of  tissues   11.  Kolesky  D  B,  Truby  R L,  Gladman  A  S,  et al.,  2014,
                 and organs. Nature Biotechnology, vol.32: 779–785.     3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden
                 https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958                tissue constructs. Advanced Materials, vol.26: 3124–3130.
              2.   Suntornnond R, An J, Chua C K, 2016, Bioprinting of   https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305506
                 thermoresponsive  hydrogels  for  next  generation  tissue   12.  Hoch E, Tovar G E M and Borchers K, 2014, Bioprint-
                 engineering:  A  review.  Macromolecular Materials and   ing  of a rtificial  blood  vessels:  Current  approaches  to-
                 Engineering.                                       wards  a  demanding  goal.  European  Journal of Car-
                 https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201600266             dio-Thoracic Surgery, vol.46: 767–778.
              3.   Lee  J  M  and  Yeong  W  Y,  2016,  Design  and  printing   https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu242
                 strategies in 3D bioprinting of cell-hydrogels: A review.   13.  Hinton  T  J,  Jallerat  Q,  Palchesko  R N ,  et al.,  2015,
                 Advanced Healthcare Material.                      Three-dimensional  printing  of  complex  biological
                 https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600435             structures  by  freeform  reversible  embedding  of  sus-
              4.   Schuurman W, Khristov V, Pot M W, et al., 2011, Bio-  pended hydrogels. Science Advances, vol.1.
                 printing of hybrid tissue constructs with tailorable me-  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500758
                 chanical properties. Biofabrication, vol.3: 021001.     14.  Bertassoni L E, Cecconi M, Manoharan V, et al., 2014,
                 https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/3/2/021001       Hydrogel bioprinted microchannel networks for vascu-
              5.   Cheah C M, Leong K F, Chua C K, et al., 2002, Cha-  larization  of  tissue  engineering  constructs.  Lab on a
                 racterization of microfeatures in selective laser sintered   Chip, vol.14: 2202–2211.
                 drug delivery devices. Proceedings of the Institution of   https://doi.org/10.1039/C4LC00030G
                 Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering   15.  Müller  M,  Becher  J,  Schnabelrauch  M,  et al.,  2013,
                 in Medicine, vol.216:   369 –383.                  Printing  thermoresponsive  reverse  molds  for t he  crea-
                 https://doi.org/10.1243/095441102321032166         tion of patterned two-component hydrogels for 3D cell
              6.   Yeong W Y, Chua C K, Leong K F, et al., 2007, Com-  culture. Journal  of Visualized  Experiments: H     ±
                 parison of drying methods in the fabrication of collagen   e50632.
                 scaffold via indirect rapid prototyping. Journal of Bio-  16.  Boparai K, Singh R, Singh H, 2015, Comparison of tri-
                 medical Materials Research — Part B Applied Biomate-  bological behaviour for Nylon6-Al-Al 2 O 3  and ABS parts
                 rials, vol.82: 260–266.                            fabricated  by  fused  deposition  modelling.  Virtual and
                 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30729                Physical Prototyping, vol.10: 59–66.
              7.   Kok Y H, Tan X P, Loh N H, et al., 2016, Geometry de-  https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2015.1037402










            86                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2017)–Volume 3, Issue 1
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92