Page 86 - IJB-3-1
P. 86

Influence of electrohydrodynamic jetting parameters on the morphology of PCL scaffolds

                 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2975834               complex  geometries.  International  Journal of Bioprinting,
              17.  Padmanabhan  T,  Kamaraj  V,  Magwood  L,  et al.  2011,   vol.2(1): 63–71.
                 Experimental investigation on the operating variables of a   http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2016.01.005
                 near-field  electrospinning  process  via  response  surface   24.  Kowalewski  T,  Bloński  S,  and  Barral  S,  2005,  Experi-
                 methodology.  Journal of Manufacturing Processes,   ments  and  modelling  of e lectrospinning  process.  Tech-
                 vol.13(2): 104–112.                               nical Sciences, vol.53(4).
                 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2011.01.003   25.  Koombhongse  S,  Liu  W,  and  Reneker  D  H,  2001,  Flat
              18.  Wei C, and Dong J, 2013, Direct fabrication of high-res-  polymer  ribbons  and  other  shapes  by  electrospinning.
                 olution three-dimensional polymeric scaffolds using elec-  Journal of  Polymer Science  Part B: Polymer  Physics,
                 trohydrodynamic  hot  jet  plotting.  Journal of  Microme-  vol.39(21): 2598–2606.
                 chanics and Microengineering, vol.23(2): 025017.     http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/polb.10015
                 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/23/2/025017   26.  Woodruff M A and Hutmacher D W, 2010, The return of
              19.  Park J U, Hardy M, Kang S J, et al. 2007, High-resolu-  a forgotten polymer — polycaprolactone in the 21st cen-
                 tion electrohydrodynamic jet printing. Nature Materials,   tury. Progress in Polymer Science, vol.35(10): 1217–1256.
                 vol.6(10): 782–789.                               http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002
                 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat1974             27.  Karageorgiou  V  and  Kaplan  D,  2005,  Porosity  of
              20.  Kim B H, Onses M S, Lim J B, et al. 2015, High-resolu-  3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials,
                 tion patterns of quantum dots formed by electrohydrody-  vol.26(27): 5474–5491.
                 namic jet printing for light-emitting diodes. Nano Letters,   http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002
                 vol.15(2): 969–973.                            28.  Garg K. and Bowlin G L, 2011, Electrospinning jets and
                 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl503779e               nanofibrous structures. Biomicrofluidics, vol.5(1): 013403.
              21.  Lee  H,  Seong  B,  Kim  J,  Jang  Y,  et al.  2014,  Direct   http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3567097
                 alignment and patterning of silver nanowires by electro-  29.  Lee A, Jin H, Dang H W, et al., 2013, Optimization of
                 hydrodynamic jet printing. Small, vol.10(19): 3918–3922.     experimental parameters to determine the jetting regimes
                 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smll.201400936          in  electrohydrodynamic  printing.  Langmuir,  vol.29(44):
              22.  Croisier F, Duwez A S, Jérôme C, et al. 2012, Mechanical   13630–13639.
                 testing  of  electrospun  PCL  fibers.  Acta  Biomaterialia,   http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la403111m
                 vol.8(1): 218–224.                             30.  Pillay V, Dott C, Choonara Y E, et al., 2013, A review of
                 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.08.015    the  effect  of pr ocessing  variables  on  the  fabrication  of
              23.  Wang H, Vijayavenkataraman S, Wu Y, et al. 2016, In-  electrospun  nanofibers  for  drug  delivery  applications.
                 vestigation  of  process  parameters  of  electrohydro-dy-  Journal of Nanomaterials, vol.13(1): 789289.
                 namic jetting for 3D printed PCL fibrous scaffolds with   http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/789289
































            82                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2017)–Volume 3, Issue 1
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91