Page 221 - IJB-10-3
P. 221

International Journal of Bioprinting                                 Sr on GO enhances PLLA/PGA scaffold




            87.   Wu Q, Hu L, Yan R, et al. Strontium-incorporated bioceramic   from porcine bone.  Colloids Surf B  Biointerfaces. 2018;
               scaffolds for enhanced osteoporosis bone regeneration. Bone   162:279-287.
               Res. 2022;10(1):55.                                doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.11.070
               doi: 10.1038/s41413-022-00224-x
                                                               91.   Meininger S, Mandal S, Kumar A, Groll J, Basu B, Gbureck
            88.   Jiang S, Wang X, Ma Y, et al. Synergistic effect of micro-  U. Strength reliability and in vitro degradation of three-
               nano-hybrid surfaces and Sr doping on the osteogenic and   dimensional  powder  printed  strontium-substituted
               angiogenic capacity of hydroxyapatite bioceramics scaffolds.   magnesium phosphate scaffolds.  Acta Biomater. 2016;
               Int J Nanomed. 2022;17:783-797.                    31:401-411.
               doi: 10.2147/IJN.S345357                           doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.050
            89.   Quade M, Vater C, Schlootz S, et al. Strontium enhances   92.   Denry I, Goudouri OM, Fredericks DC, Akkouch A,
               BMP‐2 mediated bone regeneration in a femoral murine bone   Acevedo MR, Holloway JA. Strontium-releasing fluorapatite
               defect model. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2020;108(1):174-182.  glass-ceramic  scaffolds:  structural  characterization
               doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34376
                                                                  and in vivo performance.  Acta Biomater. 2018;75:
            90.   Cheng  D,  Liang  Q,  Li  Y,  et  al.  Strontium  incorporation   463-471.
               improves the bone-forming ability of scaffolds derived      doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.047


























































            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                       213                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1829
   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226