Page 189 - IJB-10-5
P. 189

International Journal of Bioprinting                             Control nutrients to manipulate fungal growth




               doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35622-6                 28.  Aguilar-Trigueros  CA,  Boddy  L,  Rillig  MC,  Fricker  MD.
                                                                  Network traits predict ecological strategies in fungi. ISME
            16.  Soh E, Chew ZY, Saeidi N, Javadian A, Hebel D, Le Ferrand
               H. Development of an extrudable paste to build mycelium-  Commun. 2022;2(1):1-11.
               bound composites. Mater Design. 2020;195:109058.     doi: 10.1038/s43705-021-00085-1
               doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109058               29.  Veresoglou SD, Wang D, Andrade-Linares DR, Hempel S,
            17.  Soh E, Teoh JH, Leong B, Xing T, Le Ferrand H. 3D   Rillig MC. Fungal decision to exploit or explore depends on
               printing of mycelium engineered living materials using a   growth rate. Microb Ecol. 2018;75(2):289-292.
               waste-based ink and non-sterile conditions. Mater Design.      doi: 10.1007/s00248-017-1053-4
               2023;236:112481.                                30.  Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH image
               doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112481                  to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.  Nat Methods.
            18.  Elsacker E, Peeters E, De Laet L. Large-scale robotic   2012;9(7):671-675.
               extrusion-based additive manufacturing with living      doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089
               mycelium materials. Sustain Fut. 2022;4:100085.  31.  Yang L, Park D, Qin Z. Material function of mycelium-based
               doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2022.100085                    bio-composite: a review. Front Mater. 2021;8:737377.
            19.  Jauk J, Gosch L, Vašatko H, Christian I, Klaus A, Stavric      doi: 10.3389/fmats.2021.737377
               M. MyCera. Application of mycelial growth within   32.  Hotz EC, Bradshaw AJ, Elliott C, Carlson K, Dentinger BTM,
               digitally manufactured clay structures. Int J Arch Comput.   Naleway SE. Effect of agar concentration on structure and
               2022;20(1):147807712210822.                        physiology of fungal hyphal systems. J Mater Res Technol.
               doi: 10.1177/14780771221082248                     2023;24:7614-7623.
            20.  Shen SC, Lee NA, Lockett WJ, et al. Robust myco-     doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.013
               composites: a biocomposite platform for versatile hybrid-  33.  Hoa HT, Wang CL. The effects of temperature and nutritional
               living materials. Mater Horiz. 2024;11(7):1689-1703.  conditions on mycelium growth of two oyster mushrooms
               doi: 10.1039/D3MH01277H                            (Pleurotus ostreatus and Pleurotus cystidiosus). Mycobiology.
            21.  Boswell GP, Jacobs H, Davidson FA, Gadd GM, Ritz K.   2015;43(1):14-23.
               Functional consequences of nutrient translocation in      doi: 10.5941/MYCO.2015.43.1.14
               mycelial fungi. J Theor Biol. 2002;217(4):459-477.  34.  Qiu Z, Wu X, Gao W, Zhang J, Huang C. High temperature
               doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2002.3048                        induced disruption of the cell wall integrity and structure
            22.  Aleklett K, Ohlsson P, Bengtsson M, Hammer EC. Fungal   in Pleurotus ostreatus mycelia.  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol.
               foraging behaviour and hyphal space exploration in micro-  2018;102(15):6627-6636.
               structured Soil Chips. ISME J. 2021;15(6):1782-1793.     doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9090-6
               doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00886-7                 35.  Wang J, Liu Y, Zhang X, et al. 3D printed agar/ calcium
            23.  Ye XH, Yu FH, Dong M. A trade-off between guerrilla and   alginate hydrogels with high shape fidelity and tailorable
               phalanx growth forms in Leymus secalinus under different   mechanical properties. Polymer. 2021;214:123238.
               nutrient supplies. Ann Bot. 2006;98(1):187-191.     doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.123238
               doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl086                         36.  Mallakpour  S,  Azadi  E,  Hussain  CM.  State-of-the-art  of
            24.  Fomina M, Ritz K, Gadd GM. Nutritional influence on the   3D printing technology of alginate-based hydrogels—an
               ability of fungal mycelia to penetrate toxic metal-containing   emerging technique for industrial applications. Adv Colloid
               domains. Mycol Res. 2003;107(7):861-871.           Interface Sci. 2021;293:102436.
               doi: 10.1017/S095375620300786X                     doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2021.102436
            25.  Nussbaum N, von Wyl T, Gandia A, Romanens E, Rühs PA,   37.  Jones EBG, Jennings DH. The effect of cations on the growth
               Fischer P. Impact of malt concentration in solid substrate on   of fungi. New Phytol. 1965;64(1):86-100.
               mycelial  growth  and network  connectivity in  Ganoderma      doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1965.tb05378.x
               species. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):21051.             38.  Lin N, Taghizadehmakoei A, Polovina L, et al.
               doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48203-4                    3D bioprinting of food grade hydrogel infused
            26.  Fukasawa Y, Ishii K. Foraging strategies of fungal mycelial   with living  Pleurotus ostreatus Mycelium  in non-
               networks: responses to quantity and distance of new   sterile conditions.  ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2024;7(5):
               resources. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11:1244673.   2982-2992.
               doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1244673                    doi: 10.1021/acsabm.4c00048
            27.  Davidson FA, Park AW. A mathematical model for fungal   39.  Abdallah YK, Estévez AT. Biowelding 3D-Printed biodigital
               development in heterogeneous environments.  Appl Math   brick of seashell-based biocomposite by pleurotus ostreatus
               Lett. 1998;11(6):51-56.                            mycelium. Biomimetics. 2023;8(6):504.
               doi: 10.1016/S0893-9659(98)00102-5                 doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8060504


            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       181                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3939
   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194