Page 24 - IJB-6-3
P. 24

Bioprinting with collagen
           and the final layer of thrombin onto a full-thickness   agent.  With new materials, the elastic  modulus
           skin wound (2 × 2 cm ). In 2 weeks, AFS-treated     of printed structures was 5.94 MPa. The in vitro
                                2
           mice showed an average of 3% of unclosed            evaluation  of cellular  responses (viability  and
           wounds, whereas  MSC-treated  wounds showed         proliferation) was comparable to results obtained
           an average of 2%. These values were significantly   in the pure cell-laden collagen.
           lower than  those of mice  treated  with gel only,    One of the earliest studies on cartilage bioprinting
           which had an average of 13% of unclosed wounds.     using pure collagen  bioinks was carried out in
             Further  development  of  this  result  was       2016  when  primary  meniscal  fibrochondrocytes
           continued by Albanna et al. , where excisional      and high-density collagen hydrogels (from 10
                                      [27]
           wounds were bioprinted with layered autologous      to  20  mg/ml)  were  bioprinted .  In  that  study,
                                                                                             [20]
           dermal fibroblasts and epidermal keratinocytes in   the influence of collagen on several parameters,
           a fibrinogen/collagen carrier (25 mg/ml fibrinogen,   including  geometric  fidelity,  cell  viability,  and
           and 1.1 mg/ml collagen) in two different            mechanical properties of printed constructs, was
           models:  Murine full-thickness wound model          evaluated. The concentration of collagen gel had no
           (3 × 2.5 cm) and porcine full-thickness  wound      impact on cell viability, whereas the compressive
           model (10 × 10 cm). The obtained results showed     modulus of printed  gels increased  linearly  with
           a rapid wound closure, reduced contraction, and     an increase in collagen concentration.  With
           accelerated re-epithelialization.                   the highest printable concentration,  the elastic
                                                               modulus of the printed structure reached 30 kPa.
           3.2 Bone and cartilage                              These structures maintained cell viability and their

           Native bone tissues can withstand heavy loads.      geometric fidelity for 10 days while being stored
           Therefore,  3D  printed  structures,  ideally  must   in a culture medium. The geometric accuracy of
           possess the same characteristics. In this case, to   structures, printed with 15 mg/ml and 17.5 mg/ml
           strengthen 3D bioprinted structures, composite      collagen solutions, was at 74 – 78%.
                                                                               [33]
           materials  are  being  actively used nowadays, for    Shim  et al.  have printed a construct
           example, a mixture of collagen with various types   for  osteochondral  tissue  regeneration  in  the
           of bioceramics [28-31] .                            rabbit  knee joint.  Pure collagen  bio-ink that
             Kim et al.  have introduced bioceramic-based      consisted  of atelocollagen, human  turbinate-
                       [29]
           cell-printing  technique  and a cell-laden  ceramic   derived  mesenchymal  stromal  cells  (hTMSCs),
           structure. Using 3D bioprinting technology, they    and  recombinant  human  bone  morphogenetic
           created  a  cell-laden  scaffold  using  α-tricalcium   protein-2 (rhBMP-2), was printed into a
           phosphate (α-TCP) type I collagen and MC3T3-        preprinted polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffold. The
           E1 cells. First, they have printed a porous layer   prepared cylinder-shaped construct was 5 mm in
           consisting  of  micro-sized  α-TCP/collagen  struts   diameter and 5 mm in height, with a “subchondral
           without  cells,  and  then  a  cell-laden  collagen   bone  layer”  (PCL,  atelocollagen,  hTMSCs, and
           bioink  was printed  onto it.  This procedure  was   rhBMP-2) of 4 mm in thickness, and “superficial
           repeated several times to form a 3D porous cell-    cartilage  layer” (Cucurbit[6]uril, hTMSCs, and
           laden ceramic scaffold. The elastic modulus of the   TGF-β)  of  1  mm  in  thickness.  This  construct
           α-TCP/collagen scaffold was 550 kPa. However,       was in vivo implanted onto the defective part of
           this value is much lower than the elastic modulus   the rabbit knee joint.  Eight weeks later, it  was
           of a real trabecular  bone (around 20 MPa) .        shown that  the construct  possessed a capability
                                                        [32]
           Nevertheless,  it  was shown that  the  designed    for osteochondral regeneration.  The adjacent
           scaffold demonstrated  good cellular  activities,   native  cartilage  maintained  its structure without
           including metabolic activity and mineralization.    any signs of degeneration. The newly regenerated
             In the other work of Kim and Kim , β-TCP,         cartilage  tissues smoothly integrated  themselves
                                                [28]
           type I collagen and MC3T3-E1 cells were used as     with  ends of the  host cartilage  tissue.  The
           a bioink, and Genipin was used as a crosslinking    immunohistochemical analysis for collagen type

           20                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2020)–Volume 6, Issue 3
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29