Page 522 - IJB-10-6
P. 522

International Journal of Bioprinting                              Redefined collagen inks in cartilage printing




            14.   Zhang J, Wei B, He L, et al. Systematic modulation of   26.   Tran-Ba KH, Lee DJ, Zhu J, Paeng K, Kaufman LJ. Confocal
               gelation dynamics of snakehead (Channa argus) skin   rheology probes the structure and mechanics of collagen
               collagen by environmental parameters.  Macromol Res.   through the sol-gel transition.  Biophys J. 2017;113(8):
               2017;25(11):1105-1114.                             1882-1892.
               doi: 10.1007/s13233-017-5149-y                     doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.08.025
            15.   Harris JR, Reiber A. Influence of saline and pH on collagen   27.   Sarrigiannidis SO, Rey JM, Dobre O, González-García C,
               type I fibrillogenesis  in vitro: fibril polymorphism and   Dalby MJ, Salmeron-Sanchez M. A tough act to follow:
               colloidal gold labelling. Micron. 2007;38(5):513-521.   collagen hydrogel modifications to improve mechanical
               doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2006.07.026                  and growth factor loading capabilities.  Mater Today Bio.
            16.   Harris JR, Soliakov A, Lewis RJ. In vitro fibrillogenesis of   2021;10(January):100098.
               collagen type I in varying ionic and pH conditions. Micron.      doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100098
               2013;49:60-68.                                  28.   Goebel EJ, Hart KN, McCoy JC, Thompson TB. Structural
               doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2013.03.004                  biology of the TGFβ family.  Exp Biol Med. 2019;244(17):
            17.   Salinas-Fernandez  S,  Garcia  O,  Kelly  DJ,  Buckley  CT.  The   1530-1546.
               influence of pH and salt concentration on the microstructure      doi: 10.1177/1535370219880894
               and mechanical properties of meniscus extracellular matrix-  29.   Shah SS, Mithoefer K. Current applications of growth factors
               derived implants. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2024;112(3):359-372.   for knee cartilage repair and osteoarthritis treatment. Curr
               doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37634                           Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020;13(6):641-650.
            18.   Zhu S, Yuan Q, Yin T, et al. Self-assembly of collagen-based      doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09664-6
               biomaterials: preparation, characterizations and biomedical   30.   Johnstone B, Hering TM, Caplan AI, Goldberg VM, Yoo JU. In
               applications. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6(18):2650-2676.   vitro chondrogenesis of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal
               doi: 10.1039/c7tb02999c                            progenitor cells. Exp Cell Res. 1998;238(1):265-272.
            19.   Cooke ME, Rosenzweig DH. The rheology of direct      doi: 10.1006/excr.1997.3858
               and suspended extrusion bioprinting.  APL Bioeng.   31.   Kundu J, Shim JH, Jang J, Kim SW, Cho DW. An additive
               2021;5(1):011502.                                  manufacturing-based PCL-alginate-chondrocyte bioprinted
               doi: 10.1063/5.0031475                             scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen
            20.   Xing JY, Yang L, Li YL. Effect of anions on type I collagen   Med. 2015;9(11):1286-1297.
               fibrillogenesis in aqueous solution.  ISWREP 2011 –      doi: 10.1002/term.1682
               Proc 2011 Int Symp Water Resour Environ Prot. 2011;4:   32.   Zhu W, Cui H, Boualam B, et al. 3D bioprinting mesenchymal
               2975-2978.                                         stem cell-laden construct with core–shell nanospheres
               doi: 10.1109/ISWREP.2011.5893502                   for  cartilage  tissue  engineering.  Nanotechnology.
            21.   Zhu J, Kaufman LJ. Collagen I self-assembly: revealing the   2018;29(18):185101.
               developing structures that generate turbidity.  Biophys J.      doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/aaafa1
               2014;106(8):1822-1831.                          33.   Hauptstein J, Forster L, Nadernezhad A, Groll J, Teßmar
               doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.03.011                     J, Blunk T. Tethered TGF-β1 in a hyaluronic acid-based
            22.   Diamantides N, Wang L, Pruiksma T, et al. Correlating   bioink  for  bioprinting  cartilaginous  tissues.  Int J Mol Sci.
               rheological properties and printability of collagen bioinks:   2022;23(2):924.
               the effects of riboflavin photocrosslinking and pH.      doi: 10.3390/ijms23020924
               Biofabrication. 2017;9(3):034102.               34.   Komsa-Penkova R, Stavreva G, Belemezova K, Kyurkchiev
               doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa780f                      S, Todinova S, Altankov G. Mesenchymal stem-cell
            23.   Yang YL, Motte S, Kaufman LJ. Pore size variable type   remodeling of adsorbed type-I collagen – the effect of
               I collagen gels and their interaction with glioma cells.   collagen oxidation. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(6):3058.
               Biomaterials. 2010;31(21):5678-5688.               doi: 10.3390/ijms23063058
               doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.039         35.   Ge SX, Jung D, Jung D, Yao R. ShinyGO: a graphical gene-
            24.   Lai G, Li Y, Li G. Effect of concentration and temperature   set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Bioinformatics.
               on the rheological behavior of collagen solution. Int J Biol   2020;36(8):2628-2629.
               Macromol. 2008;42(3):285-291.                      doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz931
               doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2007.12.010
                                                               36.   Szklarczyk  D,  Kirsch  R,  Koutrouli  M,  et  al.  The  STRING
            25.   Xie J, Bao M, Bruekers SMC, Huck WTS. Collagen gels with   database in 2023: protein-protein association networks and
               different fibrillar microarchitectures elicit different cellular   functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome
               responses. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(23):19630-19637.   of interest. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(1D):D638-D646.
               doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b03883                        doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1000



            Volume 10 Issue 6 (2024)                       514                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.4566
   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527