Page 145 - IJB-7-1
P. 145

Rodriguez-Salvador, et al.

           Table 5. Global trend: Complementary studies.
           Article                           Year/Journal       Impact Analysis
           Nakagawa, K., & Kishimoto, T.     2019/Biotechniques  “Unlabeled optical metabolic imaging of cultured living
           “Unlabeled image analysis-based                     cells. This imaging technique is based on motion vector
           cell viability assay with intracellular             analysis with a block-matching algorithm to compare
           movement monitoring” [31]                           sequential time-lapse images. Motion vector analysis
                                                               evaluates the movement of intracellular granules observed
                                                               with a phase-contrast microscope. This assay can measure
                                                               cellular viability at a single-cell level without requiring
                                                               any reagents”. In this research, human osteosarcoma
                                                               U2OS cells, human colon carcinoma Caco-2 cells and
                                                               human hepatoma HepG2 cells were used.
           Wu, H. et al. “Electrical impedance   2018/Analyst  “In silico and in vitro cell viability inside large cell
           tomography for real-time and label-free             spheroids can be monitored in real time and label-free
           cellular viability assays of 3D tumour              with electrical impedance tomography (EIT). The results
           spheroids” [32]                                     show the potential of EIT for non-destructive real-time
                                                               and label-free cellular assays in the miniature sensor,
                                                               providing physiological information in the applications
                                                               of the 3D drug screening and tissue engineering.” MCF-7
                                                               breast cancer cells were used, and the liquid overlay
                                                               technique was adopted to form cells spheroids on the
                                                               hydrogel surface. Cell suspension with 1×104 cells were
                                                               seeded onto each microplate well.
           Parrish, J et al. “A 96-well microplate   2018/Lab on a Chip  “Platform to address the experimental and in vivo disparity
           bioreactor platform supporting                      in throughput and both system complexity (by supporting
           individual dual perfusion and high-                 multiple in situ assessment methods) and tissue complexity
           throughput assessment of simple or                  (by adopting a construct-agnostic format). It describes the
           biofabricated 3D tissue models” [33]                potential of a scalable dual perfusion bioreactor platform
                                                               for parenchymal and barrier tissue constructs to support
                                                               a broad range of multi-organ-in-a-chip applications”.
                                                               In this research human umbilical cord-derived vascular
                                                               endothelial cells (HUVEC), bone marrow-derived
                                                               mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC), human ovarian cancer
                                                               cells and human foreskin-derived fibroblast were used.


                                                               is the most prolific journal with 62 documents, followed
                                                               by Acta Biomaterialia which has almost half the number
                                                               of articles with 36. Tissue Engineering – Part A claims
                                                               the third place with 32 publications. These three journals
                                                               comprise  52%  of  all  the  documents  in  the  top  ten  list.
                                                               These  journals  focus  on  either  biomaterial  structure,
                                                               function,  and  clinical  application  or  in  therapeutic
                                                               strategies to regenerate tissue – the topics closely related
                                                               to tissue spheroids.
                                                                   Furthermore,  the  institutions  with  the  highest
                                                               numbers of publications were also identified, as shown
                                                               in  Figure  4E.  Overall,  840  institutions  were  identified
                                                               worldwide but the most prolific institutions are directly
           Figure 3. Number of documents on tissue spheroids by year of   correlated  with  the  most  prolific  countries  mentioned
           publication.                                        before.  Japan  has  the  most  prolific  institutions  with
                                                               23  publications  each  from  Kyushu  University  and  the
               Figure  4D  shows  the  journals  with  the  highest   University  of  Tokyo.  The  University  of  California
           number of publications on tissue spheroids. Biomaterials   in  the  United  States  published  a  total  of  22  articles,


                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 1       141
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150