Page 192 - IJB-7-4

Support-Vector-Machine-Guided Parameter Selection for Extrusion-Based Bioprinting
Bioprinting of Vascularized, Heterogeneous Cell-Laden https://doi.org/10.1039/c7bm00765e
Tissue Constructs. Adv Mater, 26:3124–30. 15. Fu Z, Naghieh S, Xu C, et al., 2021, Printability in Extrusion
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305506 Bioprinting. Biofabrication, 3:033001.
4. An J, Teoh JE, Suntornnond R, et al., 2015, Design and 3D https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/abe7ab
Printing of Scaffolds and Tissues. Engineering, 1:261–8. 16. Gioffredi E, Boffito M, Calzone S, et al., 2016, Pluronic F127
http://doi.org/10.15302/j-eng-2015061 Hydrogel Characterization and Biofabrication in Cellularized
5. Jessop ZM, Al-Sabah A, Gardiner MD, et al., 2017, Constructs for Tissue Engineering Applications. Procedia
3D Bioprinting for Reconstructive Surgery: Principles, CIRP, 49:125–32.
Applications and Challenges. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.11.001
70:1155–70. 17. Kang KH, Hockaday LA, Butcher JT, 2013, Quantitative
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.06.001 Optimization of Solid Freeform Deposition of Aqueous
6. Kondiah PJ, Kondiah PP, Choonara YE, et al., 2020, A 3D Hydrogels. Biofabrication, 5:035001.
Bioprinted Pseudo-Bone Drug Delivery Scaffold for Bone https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/5/3/035001
Tissue Engineering. Pharmaceutics, 12:166. 18. Soltan N, Ning L, Mohabatpour F, et al., 2019, Printability
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12020166 and Cell Viability in Bioprinting Alginate Dialdehyde-Gelatin
7. Ma X, Liu J, Zhu W, et al., 2018, 3D Bioprinting of Functional Scaffolds. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 5:2976–87.
Tissue Models for Personalized Drug Screening and In Vitro https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00167
Disease Modeling. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 132:235–51. 19. Naghieh S, Sarker MD, Sharma NK, et al., 2019, Printability
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.06.011 of 3D Printed Hydrogel Scaffolds: Influence of Hydrogel
8. Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al., 2020, Vat Polymerization- Composition and Printing Parameters. Appl Sci, 10:292.
Based Bioprinting-Process, Materials, Applications and https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010292
Regulatory Challenges. Biofabrication, 12:022001. 20. Paxton N, Smolan W, Bock T, et al., 2017, Proposal to Assess
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6034 Printability of Bioinks for Extrusion-Based Bioprinting
9. Lee JM, Sing SL, Zhou M, et al., 2018, 3D Bioprinting and Evaluation of Rheological Properties Governing
Processes: A Perspective on Classification and Terminology. Bioprintability. Biofabrication, 9:044107.
Int J Bioprint, 4:151. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8
https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v4i2.151 21. Yu C, Jiang J, 2020, A Perspective on Using Machine
10. Ouyang L, Yao R, Zhao Y, et al., 2016, Effect of Bioink Learning in 3D Bioprinting. Int J Bioprint, 6:253.
Properties on Printability and Cell Viability for 3D Bioplotting http://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i1.253
of Embryonic Stem Cells. Biofabrication, 8:035020. 22. Conev A, Litsa EE, Perez MR, et al., 2020, Machine Learning-
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020 Guided Three-Dimensional Printing of Tissue Engineering
11. Suntornnond R, An J, Chua CK, 2017, Bioprinting Scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A, 26:1359–68.
of Thermoresponsive Hydrogels for Next Generation https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0191
Tissue Engineering: A Review. Macromol Mater Eng, 23. Menon A, Póczos B, Feinberg AW, et al., 2019, Optimization
302:1600266. of Silicone 3D Printing with Hierarchical Machine Learning.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201600266 3D Print Addit Manuf, 6:181–9.
12. Malda J, Visser J, Melchels FP, et al., 2013, 25 Anniversary https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2018.0088
th
Article: Engineering Hydrogels for Biofabrication. Adv 24. Ruberu K, Senadeera M, Rana S, et al., 2021, Coupling
Mater, 25:5011–28. Machine Learning with 3D Bioprinting to Fast Track
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201302042 Optimisation of Extrusion Printing. Appl Mater Today,
13. Hospodiuk M, Dey M, Sosnoski D, et al., 2017, The Bioink: 22:100914.
A Comprehensive Review on Bioprintable Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100914
Biotechnol Adv, 35:217–39. 25. Holzl K, Lin SM, Tytgat L, et al., 2016, Bioink Properties Before,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006 during and after 3D Bioprinting. Biofabrication, 8:032002.
14. Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Inci I, Zhang YS, et al., 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032002
Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: An Overview. Biomater Sci, 26. Suntornnond R, Tan EY, An J, et al., 2016, A Mathematical
6:915–46. Model on the Resolution of Extrusion Bioprinting for the

188 International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 4