Page 73 - IJB-7-4
P. 73

Avila-Ramírez, et al.
           medium. The media were changed on the 4  day. Then,   and is more stable in the air or under wet conditions. An
                                                th
           the treated cells were cultivated together with a droplet   underwater printing test was done; a 2D structure of a grid
           of 10 µL of crosslinked bioink. As a blank, a droplet was   and another at undersea water of the KAUST (Figure 2C)
           incubated  in  the  same  conditions,  with no cells.  As a   was printed  and  kept  after  12  weeks in  seawater.  The
           control, cells were cultured without a droplet of bioink.   printed structure did not have visible degradation  and
           The cells proliferation  was measured using  Alamar   was derived from the photo-crosslinking of PEGDA and
           Blue (Invitrogen, CAT: DAL1025) by adding 1/10   of   GelMA and ionic-crosslinking of alginate with calcium
                                                       th
           the  volume  directly  to  the  cells,  followed  by  2  h  of   ions found in the filtered water obtained from the Red
           incubation. Fluorescence was read in a PheraStar plate   Sea, permitting the appliance of this material directly in
           reader (Ex/Em: 485/520). The cell viability was evaluated   damaged coral reefs.
           using the Live/Dead assay (Invitrogen, CAT: L3224).     In addition, as printing takes significant amounts of
                                                               time, we established a 3D molding protocol. The ink was
           3. Results and discussion                           directly  poured  into  the  negative  molds  obtained  from
           The ink was printed in an extrusion-based 3D printing   natural coral structures, where these samples were dried
           at a pre-crosslinked state with the aid of the robotic arm   at room temperature overnight. These structures coming
           system. In this example, several layers can be printed one   from the mold  were rigid  and complex.  Consequently,
           over another without collapsing. Moreover, with the aid of   this is a cost-effective methodology that does not require
           blue light, crosslinking can aid in printing to invent more   robust equipment.
           complex structures. For this case, we demonstrated that   During the formulation development, we noticed
           it could be done even at the ground state behavior from   that the ink was enhanced by adding hydroxyapatite
           the formulation. For instance, with the incidence of blue   (to improve the under-water stability property) and
           light, the printed structure can be easier to manufacture   calcium  carbonate  (to  increase  the  stiffness  from  the

                         A                               C                       E









                         B                                 D



























           Figure 2. 2D/3D fabrication. (A-A”) 3D printing of a 50-layer cylindric structure with the aid of an assembled 6-degree-of-freedom
           robotic arm system coupled with an extrusion-based bioprinter. (B) The image processing technique that is used to obtain a SSIM. (C-C”)
           Manufacturing under wet conditions of structure KAUST one-layer structure and a squared-grid. (D) Molded structures dried at room
           temperature overnight. (E) Squared grid printed and details at millimetric scale after crosslinking and desiccation. Videos from A and C are
           included in the supplementary file.

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 4        69
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78