Page 256 - IJB-8-3
P. 256

3D Printing and Vascularized Organ Construction
           5. Conclusions and perspectives                         https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2194

           The procedure of vascularized organ 3D printing involves   2.   Robertson  MP, Hinde  RL,  Lavee  J, 2019,  Analysis of
           a series of material  property changing processes at    Official Deceased Organ Donation Data Casts Doubt on the
           molecular, cell, tissue, and organ levels. A typical property   Credibility of China’s Organ Transplant Reform. BMC Med
           of vascularized organ 3D printing is that it produces new   Ethics, 20:79.
           functional  objects  which  are  totally  different  from  the      https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0406-6
           raw materials.  It is an emerging new interdisciplinary   3.   Wang X, Liu C, 2018, 3D Bioprinting of Adipose-derived
           field that needs a large scope of talent cooperation, such
           as biomaterials, biology, physics, chemistry, computers,   Stem Cells for Organ Manufacturing. In: Enabling Cutting
           mechanics,  bioinformatics,  and medicine.  With the    Edge Technology for Regenerative Medicine. Ch. 1. Berlin:
           combination of innovative technologies, 3D printing has   Spirnger. p3–14.
           significant  advantages  in  the  construction  of  vascular   4.   Lei  M, Wang  X, 2016, Biodegradable  Polymers  and  Stem
           networks  in  organs.  For  a  long  time,  researchers  have   Cells for Bioprinting. Molecules, 21:539.
           developed  a variety  of biocompatible  3D printing      https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050539
           platforms  with high sustainability  and output.  As an   5.   Liu F, Liu C, Chen Q, et al., 2017, Progress in Organ 3D
           irreplaceable  permanent  vascular  network  generation
           approach,  3D printing  technology has attracted  many   Bioprinting. Int J Bioprinting, 4:1–15.
           researchers because of its feasibility, diversity, and precise   6.   Yeong  WY,  Chua  CK,  Leong  KF,  et  al.,  2004, Rapid
           controllability. Current and future studies on 3D printing   Prototyping in Tissue Engineering: Challenges and Potential.
           should target to overcome the technical drawbacks, such   Trends Biotechnol, 22:643–52.
           as the precise regulation of the vessel sizes, the accurate      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.10.004
           calculation of the branched angles and the exact building
           of the capillaries (with a diameter about 5 – 8 μm). It is   7.   Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M, 2016, Current Advances and Future
           necessary to improve the printing resolution in most of the   Perspectives in Extrusion-Based Bioprinting.  Biomaterials,
           3D printing technologies with much more biocompatible   76:321–43.
           polymers.  Undoubtedly,  3D printing  of vascularized      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076
           organs will become a promising research trend in    8.   Cui H, Nowicki M, Fisher JP, et al., 2017, 3D Bioprinting for
           biomedical fields in view of the unlimited automaticity,   Organ Regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater, 6:1601118.
           producibility, and repeatability of the techniques.
                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601118
           Funding                                             9.   Griffith LG, Wu B, Cima MJ, et al., 1997, In Vitro Organogenesis
                                                                   of Liver Tissue. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 831:382–97.
           The  work  was  supported  by  grants  from  the  Key
           Research  and  Development  Project  of Liaoning        https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb52212.x
           Province (No. 2018225082), the 2018 Scientist Partners   10.  Zein NN, Hanouneh IA, Bishop PD,  et al.,  2013, Three-
           of China Medical  University (CMU) and Shenyang         Dimensional Print of a Liver for Preoperative Planning in Living
           Branch of Chinese  Academy  of Sciences  (CAS) (No.     Donor Liver Transplantation. Liver Transpl, 19:1304–10.
           HZHB2018013), and  the  National  Natural  Science      https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.23729
           Foundation of China (NSFC) (Nos. 81571832).
                                                               11.  Paulsen SJ, Miller JS, 2015, Tissue Vascularization Through
           Conflicts of interest                                   3D Printing:  Will  Technology  bring us Flow?  Dev  Dyn,
                                                                   244:629–40.
           The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.24254
           Authors’ contributions                              12.  Chow SY, Yen-Chow YC, Woodbury DM, 1992, Studies on

           S.L.: Original  draft  preparation, edition,  revision,  and   pH Regulatory Mechanisms in Cultured Astrocytes of DBA
           supplement;  S.L.  Supplement;  X.W.:  Revision  and    and C57 Mice. Epilepsia, 33:775–84.
           correction.  All authors have read and agreed to the      https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1992.tb02181.x
           published version of the manuscript.                13.  Kannan RY, Salacinski HJ, Sales K, et al., 2005, The Roles of
                                                                   Tissue Engineering and Vascularisation in the Development
           References
                                                                   of  Micro-Vascular  Networks:  A  Review.  Biomaterials,
           1.   Chatterjee P, Venkataramani AS, Vijayan A, et al., 2015, The   26:1857–75.
               Effect of State Policies on Organ Donation and Transplantation      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.006
               in the United States. JAMA Intern Med, 175:1323–9.  14.  Segal SS,  1994, Cell-to-cell Communication  Coordinates

           248                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 3
   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261