Page 70 - IJB-8-4
P. 70
3D Bioprinting for Anticancer Drug Screening
Used for Their Analysis. Biotechnol Adv, 34:1427–41. 28:6649–55.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.11.002 83. Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D Bioprinting of Tissues and
71. Hoffmann OI, Ilmberger C, Magosch S, et al., 2015, Impact Organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32:773–85.
of the Spheroid Model Complexity on Drug Response. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958
J Biotechnol, 205:14–23. 84. Ingber DE, Mow VC, Butler D, et al., 2006, Tissue
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.02.029 Engineering and Developmental Biology: Going Biomimetic.
72. Nunes AS, Barros AS, Costa EC, et al., 2019, 3D Tumor Tissue Eng, 12:3265–83.
Spheroids as In Vitro Models to Mimic In Vivo Human Solid https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.3265
Tumors Resistance to Therapeutic Drugs. Biotechnol Bioeng, 85. Mironov V, Visconti RP, Kasyanov V, et al., 2009, Organ
116:206–26. Printing: Tissue Spheroids as Building Blocks. Biomaterials,
https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26845 30:2164–74.
73 Fang Y, Eglen RM, 2017, Three-Dimensional Cell Cultures in https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.3265
Drug Discovery and Development. SLAS Discov, 22:456–72. 86. Kelm JM, Lorber V, Snedeker JG, et al., 2010, A Novel Concept
https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057117696795 for Scaffold-Free Vessel Tissue Engineering: Self-assembly of
74. Kitaeva KV, Rutland CS, Rizvanov AA, et al., 2020, Cell Microtissue Building Blocks. J Biotechnol, 148:46–55.
Culture Based In Vitro Test Systems for Anticancer Drug https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.03.002
Screening. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 8:322. 87. Tiwari AP, Thorat ND, Pricl S, et al., 2021, Bioink:
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00322 A 3D-Bioprinting Tool for Anticancer Drug Discovery and
75. Clevers H, 2016, Modeling Development and Disease with Cancer Management. Drug Discov Today, 26:1574–90.
Organoids. Cell, 165:1586–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2021.03.010
76. Velasco V, Shariati SA, Esfandyarpour R, 2020, 88. Hospodiuk M, Dey M, Sosnoski D, et al., 2017, The Bioink:
Microtechnology-Based Methods for Organoid Models. A Comprehensive Review on Bioprintable Materials.
Microsyst Nanoeng, 6:76. Biotechnol Adv, 35:217–39.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41378-020-00185-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006
77. Lutolf MP, Lauer-Fields JL, Schmoekel HG, et al., 2003, 89. Kleinman HK, Martin GR, 2005, Matrigel: Basement
Synthetic Matrix Metalloproteinase-Sensitive Hydrogels Membrane Matrix with Biological Activity. Semin Cancer
for the Conduction of Tissue Regeneration: Engineering Biol, 15:378–86.
Cell Invasion Characteristics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.05.004
100:5413–8. 90. Yin Z, Dong C, Jiang K, et al., 2019, Heterogeneity of
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0737381100 Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts and Roles in the Progression,
78. Nguyen KT, West JL, 2002, Photopolymerizable Hydrogels for Prognosis, and Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Tissue Engineering Applications. Biomaterials, 23:4307–14. J Hematol Oncol, 12;101.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00175-8 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-019-0782-x
79. Charbe N, McCarron PA, Tambuwala MM, 2017, Three- 91. Belgodere JA, King CT, Bursavich JB, et al., 2018,
Dimensional Bio-Printing: A New Frontier in Oncology Engineering Breast Cancer Microenvironments and 3D
Research. World J Clin Oncol, 8:21. Bioprinting. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 6:66.
https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v8.i1.21 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00066
80. Zaeri A, Zgeib R, Cao K, et al., 2022, Numerical Analysis on 92. Foyt DA, Norma MA, Yu TT, et al., 2018, Exploiting
the Effects of Microfluidic-based Bioprinting Parameters on Advanced Hydrogel Technologies to Address Key Challenges
the Microfiber Geometrical Outcomes. Sci Rep, 12:3364. in Regenerative Medicine. Adv Healthcare Mat, 7:1700939.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07392-0 https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700939
81. Colosi C, Shin SR, Manoharan V, et al., 2016, Microfluidic 93. Markstedt K, Mantas A, Tournier I, et al., 2015, 3D Bioprinting
Bioprinting of Heterogenous 3D Tissue Constructs Using Human Chondrocytes with Nanocellulose-Alginate Bioink
Low-viscosity Bioink. Adv Mater, 28:677–84. for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Applications. Biomacromol,
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503310 16:1489–96.
82. Yu Y, Wei W, Wang Y, et al., 2016, Simple Spinning of https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188
Heterogeneous Hollow Microfibers on Chip. Adv Mater, 94. Duan B, Hockaday LA, Hang KH, et al., 2013, 3D Bioprinting
62 International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4

