Page 71 - IJB-8-4
P. 71

Fang, et al.
               of Heterogeneous  Aortic  Valve Conduits with  Alginate/     https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.2016.02.003
               Gelatin Hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A, 101:1255–64.  106.  Huh D, Hamilton GA,  Ingber DE, 2011, From 3D  Cell
               https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34420                 Culture to Organs-on-chips. Trends Cell Biol, 21:745–54.
           95.  Norotte C, Marga FS, Niklason LE, et al., 2009, Scaffold-     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2011.09.005
               Free  Vascular  Tissue Engineering Using Bioprinting.   107.  Chang SF, Chang CA, Lee  DY,  et al., 2008, Tumour Cell
               Biomaterials, 30:5910–7.                            Cycle Arrest Induced by Shear Stress: Roles of Integrins and
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.034  Smad. Proc Nat Acad Sci, 105:3927–32.
           96.  Rhee S, Puetzer JL, Mason BN, et al., 2016, 3D Bioprinting      https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0712353105
               of Spatially Heterogeneous Collagen Constructs for Cartilage   108.  Skardal A, Aleman J, Forsythe S, et al., 2020, Drug Compound
               Tissue Engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2:1800–5.  Screening in Single and Integrated Multi-Organoid Body-on-
               https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00288     a-chip Systems, Biofabrication, 12:025017.
           97.  Kingsley  DM, Roberge  CL,  Rudkouskaya A,  et  al., 2019,      https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6d36
               Laser-Based 3D Bioprinting for Spatial and Size Control   109.  Bhatia SN, Ingber DE, 2014, Microfluidic Organs-on-chips.
               of Tumor Spheroids and Embryoid Bodies. Acta Biomater,   Nat Biotechnol, 32:760–72.
               95:357–70.                                          https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2989
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.014    110.  Yang Q, Lian  Q, Xu F, 2017, Perspective:  Fabrication  of
           98.  Lim KS, Galarraga JH, Cui X, et al., 2020, Fundamentals and   Integrated Organ-On-Achip Via Bioprinting. Biomicrofluidics,
               Applications  of Photo-Cross-Linking in Bioprinting.  Chem   11:031301.
               Rev, 120:10662–94.                                  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4982945
               https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00812     111.  Asano H, Shiraishi  Y, 2015, Development  of Paper-
           99.  Shin JY, Yeo YH, Jeong JE, et al., 2020, Dual-Crosslinked   Based  Microfluidic  Analytical  Device  for  Iron  Assay
               Methylcellulose Hydrogels for 3D Bioprinting Applications.   Using Photomask Printed with 3D Printer for Fabrication
               Carbohydr Polym, 238:116192.                        of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Zones on Paper by
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116192       Photolithography. Anal Chim Acta, 883:55–60.
           100.  Konig G, McAllister TN, Dusserre N, et al., 2009, Mechanical      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.04.014
               Properties  of Completely  Autologous Human  Tissue   112.  Carvalho V, Gonçalves I, Lage T, et al., 2021, 3D Printing
               Engineered Blood Vessels Compared to Human Saphenous   Techniques and  Their  Applications to Organ-on-a-chip
               Vein and Mammary Artery. Biomaterials, 30:1542–50.  Platforms: A Systematic Review. Sensors, 21:33014.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.011     https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093304
           101.  Rago  AP,  Dean  DM, Morgan  JP, 2009,  Controlling  Cell   113.  Qin D, Xia Y, Whitesides GM, 2010, Soft Lithography for
               Position in Complex Heterotypic 3D Microtissues by Tissue   Micro-and Nanoscale Patterning. Nat Protoc, 5, 491–502.
               Fusion. Biotechnol Bioeng, 102:1231–41.             https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.234
               https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22162               114.  McDonald JC, Whitesides GM, 2002, Poly (Dimethylsiloxane)
           102.  Xu Q, Norma JT, Shrivastav J, et al., 2007, In Vitro Models   as a Material for Fabricating Microfluidic Devices. Acc Chem
               of TGF-β-induced Fibrosis Suitable for High-throughput   Res, 35:491–9.
               Screening of Antifibrotic Agents. Am J Physiol, 293:F631–40.     https://doi.org/10.1021/ar010110q
               https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00379.2006     115.  Thakare K,  Jerpseth L, Pei Z,  et al., 2021, Bioprinting
           103.  Wang Y, Shi W, Kuss M, et al., 2018, 3D Bioprinting of Breast   of  Organ-on-chip  Systems:  A  Literature  Review  from  a
               Cancer Models for Drug Resistance Study. ACS Biomater Sci   Manufacturing Perspective. J Manuf Mater Process, 5:91.
               Eng, 4:4401–11.                                     https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp5030091
               https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01277  116.  Bernard A, Renault JP, Michel B, et al., 2000, Microcontact
           104.  Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D Bioprinting of Tissues and   Printing of Proteins. Adv Mater, 12:1067–70.
               Organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32:773–85.                  https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4095(200007)12:14<1067:aid-
               https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958                    adma1067>3.0.co;2-m
           105.  Knowlton S, Joshi A, Yenilmez B, et al., 2016, Advancing   117.  Auner AW, Tasneem KM, Markov DA, et al., 2019, Chemical-
               Cancer Research Using  Bioprinting for  Tumour-on-chip   PDMS Binding Kinetics and Implications for Bioavailability
               Platforms. Int J Bioprint, 2:3–8.                   in Microfluidic Devices. Lab Chip, 19:864–74.

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4        63
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76