Page 151 - IJB-9-4

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D-printed scaffolds for osteochondral defects

sub-population in normal human articular cartilage. PLoS osteochondral repair. Acta Biomater, 10(5):1996–2004.
One, 5(10):e13246.
91. Zhu M, He X, Xin C, et al., 2020, 3D printing of an integrated
77. Fellows CR, Williams R, Davies IR, et al., 2017, Characterisation triphasic MBG-alginate scaffold with enhanced interface
of a divergent progenitor cell sub-populations in human bonding for hard tissue applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med,
osteoarthritic cartilage: The role of telomere erosion and 31(12):1–8.
replicative senescence. Sci Rep, 7(1):1–11.
92. Huey DJ, Hu JC, Athanasiou KA, 2012, Unlike bone, cartilage
78. Mccarthy HE, Bara JJ, Brakspear K, et al., 2012, The regeneration remains elusive. Science, 338(6109):917–921.
comparison of equine articular cartilage progenitor cells and
bone marrow-derived stromal cells as potential cell sources 93. Mancini IA, Vindas Bolaños RA, Brommer H, et al., 2017,
for cartilage repair in the horse. Vet J, 192(3):345–351. Fixation of hydrogel constructs for cartilage repair in the
equine model: A challenging issue. Tissue Eng C Methods,
79. Wakitani S, Aoki H, Harada Y, et al., 2004, Embryonic stem 23(11):804–814.
cells form articular cartilage, not teratomas, in osteochondral
defects of rat joints. Cell Transplant, 13(4):331–336. 94. Mancini I, Schmidt S, Brommer H, et al., 2020, A composite
hydrogel-3D printed thermoplast osteochondral anchor as
80. Mckee C, Hong Y, Yao D, et al., 2017, Compression induced example for a zonal approach to cartilage repair: In vivo
chondrogenic differentiation of embryonic stem cells in performance in a long-term equine model. Biofabrication,
three-dimensional polydimethylsiloxane scaffolds. Tissue 12(3):035028.
Eng Part A, 23(9-10):426–435.
95. Zhang B, Huang J, Narayan RJ, 2020, Gradient scaffolds for
81. Chan CK, Seo EY, Chen JY, et al., 2015, Identification and
specification of the mouse skeletal stem cell. Cell, 160(1-2): osteochondral tissue engineering and regeneration. J Mater
285–298. Chem B, 8(36):8149–8170.
96. Nooeaid P, Salih V, Beier JP, et al., 2012, Osteochondral
82. Murphy MP, Koepke LS, Lopez MT, et al., 2020, Articular
cartilage regeneration by activated skeletal stem cells. Nat tissue engineering: Scaffolds, stem cells and applications. J
Med, 26(10):1583–1592. Cell Mol Med, 16(10):2247–2270.
97. Nooeaid P, Roether JA, Weber E, et al., 2014, Technologies
83. Khader A, Arinzeh TL, 2020, Biodegradable zinc oxide
composite scaffolds promote osteochondral differentiation of for multilayered scaffolds suitable for interface tissue
mesenchymal stem cells. Biotechnol Bioeng, 117(1):194–209. engineering. Adv Eng Mater, 16(3):319–327.
98. Di Luca A, Lorenzo‐Moldero I, Mota C, et al., 2016, Tuning
84. Deng C, Lin R, Zhang M, et al., 2019, Micro/nanometer‐
structured scaffolds for regeneration of both cartilage and cell differentiation into a 3D scaffold presenting a pore shape
subchondral bone. Adv Funct Mater, 29(4):1806068. gradient for osteochondral regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater,
5(14):1753–1763.
85. Chen G, Sato T, Tanaka J, et al., 2006, Preparation of a 99. Lowen JM, Leach JK, 2020, Functionally graded biomaterials
biphasic scaffold for osteochondral tissue engineering. for use as model systems and replacement tissues. Adv Funct
Mater Sci Eng C, 26(1):118–123.
Mater, 30(44):1909089.
86. Seo S-J, Mahapatra C, Singh RK, et al., 2014, Strategies 100. Radhakrishnan J, Manigandan A, Chinnaswamy P, et al.,
for osteochondral repair: Focus on scaffolds. J Tissue Eng, 2018, Gradient nano-engineered in situ forming composite
5:2041731414541850.
hydrogel for osteochondral regeneration. Biomaterials,
87. Deng C, Yang J, He H, et al., 2021, 3D bio-printed biphasic 162:82–98.
scaffolds with dual modification of silk fibroin for the 101. Liu Z, Meyers MA, Zhang Z, et al., 2017, Functional
integrated repair of osteochondral defects. Biomater Sci, gradients and heterogeneities in biological materials: Design
9(14):4891–4903. principles, functions, and bioinspired applications. Progr
88. Simkin PA, 2012, Consider the tidemark. J Rheumatol: Mater Sci, 88:467–498.
890–892. 102. Guo J, Li C, Ling S, et al., 2017, Multiscale design and
89. Goldring SR, Goldring MB, 2016, Changes in the synthesis of biomimetic gradient protein/biosilica
osteochondral unit during osteoarthritis: Structure, composites for interfacial tissue engineering. Biomaterials,
function and cartilage–bone crosstalk. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 145:44–55.
12(11):632–644. 103. Singh YP, Moses JC, Bandyopadhyay A, et al., 2022, 3D
90. Levingstone TJ, Matsiko A, Dickson GR, et al., 2014, A bioprinted silk‐based in vitro osteochondral model for
biomimetic multi-layered collagen-based scaffold for osteoarthritis therapeutics. Adv Healthc Mater:2200209.

Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023) 143 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.724