Page 146 - IJB-9-4
P. 146

International Journal of Bioprinting                             3D-printed scaffolds for osteochondral defects






































            Figure 4. 3D-printed biphasic scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering. (A) Schematic diagram of the preparation of 3D-printed biphasic scaffold and
            its applications. (B) Microscopic morphology of 3D-printed biphasic scaffolds. (C) The viability of cellswithin the scaffolds on the first day after printing
            24h. (D) Gross observation of the repaired joints in different groups. (E) Micro-CT images at week 12 after implantation (Reproduced from ref.  with
                                                                                                        [87]
            permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry).
            separate  regions.  Therefore,  multiphasic  and  continuous   a single structure [95-98] . It is noted that there is no clear
            gradient scaffolds with gradient physical and chemical   boundary between layers of the scaffolds .
                                                                                               [98]
            properties are necessary for a smooth transition between
            different layers of the osteochondral unit. The multilayered   Gradient scaffolds consistently outperform monophasic
            osteochondral scaffold has at least four  different layers.   and biphasic ones in osteochondral defect repair [99,100] . The
            Increasing the number of phases from three to four   gradient can be described  in terms of variations in the
            or more usually means dividing the AC section into   chemical composition and structural characteristics of
            different zones. For example, Mancini  et al.  proposed   the basic units, further including several basic forms of
                                                [93]
            an osteochondral scaffold consisting of four different   arrangement,  distribution,  size,  and  orientation [101] .  The
            layers, with the aim of better simulating the properties of   combined incorporation of different patterns of chemical
            the different regions of AC. This multiphasic scaffold has   and structural gradients in a monolithic osteochondral
            a different collagen arrangement from top to bottom: the   scaffold have been explored in orthopedic research as well.
            PCL scaffold is based on a 0°, 90° cross-alignment pattern   For example, with regard to the hydrogel-based scaffolds,
            with decreasing porosity until the texture is dense, with the   sequential addition of different solutions into a cylindrical
            CCZ-like structure acting as the interface zone; the third   container layer-by-layer before the complete gelation
            layer is that PCL extending along the hydrogel containing   allows for the formation of a gradient interface. Utilizing
            mesenchymal stromal cells with a 70% porosity; the PCL is   the silk protein-based composites coupled with biosilica
            removed from the fourth layer and the hydrogel is retained,   selective peptide-R5, Guo  et al. fabricated a bioinspired
            but the MSCs are replaced by articular cartilage progenitor   gradient protein/biosilica analog by layering three regions
            cells (ACPCs) . Therefore, it is easy to see how complex   with high, medium, and low concentrations of the R5
                       [94]
            this construction is, and finer 3D printing technology is   peptide along the longitudinal direction [102] . This gradient
            required to make it easy to achieve. As shown in Figure 5C,   silicified silk/R5 system showed continuous transitions in
            multiphasic scaffolds with discrete gradients are prepared   composition, structure, and mechanical properties and
            by stitching, gluing and press-fitting different phases into   could promote the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs
                                                               in vitro in a gradient manner [102] . Multiphasic gradient


            Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023)                        138                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.724
   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151