Page 148 - IJB-9-4
P. 148

International Journal of Bioprinting                             3D-printed scaffolds for osteochondral defects



            solve the clinical problem of osteochondral defects, such as   References
            materials, biostructures, and biomechanics.
                                                               1.   Armiento AR, Alini M, Stoddart MJ, 2019, Articular
                                                                  fibrocartilage—Why does hyaline cartilage fail to repair?
            Acknowledgments                                       Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 146:289–305.
            Some of the images in this article are created using   2.   Yasui Y, Wollstein A, Murawski CD, et al., 2017, Operative
            Biorender.com.                                        treatment for osteochondral lesions of the talus: Biologics
                                                                  and scaffold-based therapy. Cartilage, 8(1):42–49.
            Funding                                            3.   Gobbi A, Lane JG, Dallo I, 2020, Editorial commentary:

            This work was supported by the Young Medical Talents   Cartilage restoration—What is currently available? 36(6):
            Training Program of Pudong Health Committee of Shanghai   1625–1628.
            (Grant No. PWRq 2021-08), the Health Industry Clinical   4.   Assenmacher AT, Pareek A, Reardon PJ, et al., 2016, Long-
            Research Project of Shanghai Health Commission (Project no.   term outcomes after osteochondral allograft: A systematic
            20224Y0393),  the Youth Science and Technology Project of   review  at long-term follow-up of 12.3  years.  Arthroscopy,
            Health Commission of Shanghai Pudong New Area (Project   32(10):2160–2168.
            no. PW2020B-5), the Outstanding Clinical Discipline   5.   Hoshi  K,  Fujihara  Y,  Yamawaki T,  et al.,  2018,  Biological
            Project of Shanghai Pudong (Grant No. PWYgy2021-04), the   aspects of tissue-engineered cartilage. Histochem Cell Biol,
            Outstanding Leaders Training Program of Pudong Hospital   149(4):375–381.
            affiliated to Fudan University (Grant No. LX202201), the   6.   Kok A, van Bergen C, Tuijthof G, et al., 2015, Macroscopic
            Project of Key Medical Specialty and Treatment Center of   ICRS poorly correlates with O Driscoll histological
            Pudong Hospital of Fudan University (Project no. Tszb2023-  cartilage repair assessment in a goat model. Clin Res Foot
            05), the Scientific Research Project for Agricultural and   Ankle:1–7.
            Social Undertakings in Jiading District (Grant No. Shanghai   7.   Galperin A, Floreani RA, Florczyk SJ, et al., 2013, Integrated
            JDKW-2019-W08), the Talents Training Program of       bi‐layered  scaffold  for  osteochondral  tissue  engineering.
            Pudong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University (Project no.   Adv Healthc Mater, 2(6):872–883.
            PX202001), and the Scientific Research Foundation provided
            by Pudong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University (Project   8.   Camarero-Espinosa S, Cooper-White J, 2017, Tailoring
            no. YJRCJJ201906), the Shanghai Scientific and Technology   biomaterial scaffolds for osteochondral repair. Int J Pharm,
                                                                  523(2):476–489.
            Committee, China (grant no. 201409003700).
                                                               9.   Duraine G, Hu J, Athanasiou K, 2011, Bioengineering
            Conflict of interest                                  in the oral cavity: Insights from articular cartilage tissue
                                                                  engineering. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant, 26(Suppl):11.
            The authors declare no conflict of interests.
                                                               10.  Grogan SP, Miyaki S, Asahara H, et al., 2009, Mesenchymal
            Author contributions                                  progenitor cell markers in human articular cartilage: Normal
                                                                  distribution and changes in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther,
            Conceptualization: Dejian Li                          11(3):1–13.
            Writing – original drafts: Jianhang Du, Ziqing Zhu, Jia Liu,   11.  Boushell MK, Hung CT, Hunziker EB, et al., 2017, Current
               Xiaogang Bao, Qian Wang, Changgui Shi, Chaoqian    strategies for integrative cartilage repair. Connect Tissue Res,
               Zhao                                               58(5):393–406.
            Writing – review & editing: Guohua Xu, Dejian Li
                                                               12.  Kuyinu EL, Narayanan G, Nair LS,  et al., 2016, Animal
               All the authors read and approved the final form of the   models of osteoarthritis: Classification, update, and
            manuscript.                                           measurement of outcomes. J Orthop Surg Res, 11(1):1–27.
                                                               13.  Fujioka  R,  Aoyama  T,  Takakuwa  T,  2013,  The  layered
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            structure  of  the  articular  surface.  Osteoarthritis Cartilage,
            Not applicable.                                       21(8):1092–1098.
                                                               14.  Hunziker EB, Michel M, Studer D, 1997, Ultrastructure of
            Consent for publication                               adult human articular cartilage matrix after cryotechnical
                                                                  processing. Microsc Res Tech, 37(4):271–284.
            Not applicable.
                                                               15.  Hoemann CD, Lafantaisie-Favreau C-H, Lascau-Coman V,
            Availability of data                                  et al., 2012, The cartilage-bone interface.  J Knee Surg,
                                                                  25(02):085–098.
            Not applicable.


            Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023)                        140                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.724
   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153