Page 93 - IJB-9-5
P. 93

International Journal of Bioprinting


                                        REVIEW ARTICLE
                                        The application and prospects of 3D printable

                                        microgel in biomedical science and engineering



                                        Chengcheng Du , Wei Huang *, Yiting Lei *
                                                                             1,2
                                                                  1,2
                                                      1,2
                                        1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,
                                        Chongqing 400016, China
                                        2 Orthopedic Laboratory of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
                                        (This article belongs to the Special Issue: Advances in Bioprinting for Medical Applications)

                                        Abstract

                                        Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology is one of the most advanced
                                        techniques currently applied in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine and
                                        has developed rapidly in the past few years. Despite many breakthroughs, there are
                                        still several challenges of 3D bioprinting technology awaiting to be addressed, and
                                        one of them is the urgency of optimizing bioinks (natural or synthetic hydrogel),
                                        which are critical elements in 3D bioprinting, for specific properties. Different from
                                        traditional hydrogels, microgels, which are a new type of bioink, are micron-sized
                                        gels with excellent mechanical and biological properties, which make them great
                                        candidates for applications in 3D bioprinting. Different from the dense and limited
                                        pore size of traditional hydrogels, the pore structure of microgel is adjustable, enabling
                                        better cell loading before 3D bioprinting, and the printed pores are conducive to
                                        the exchange of metabolic substances and cell migration. The “bottom-up” modular
                                        microgel has stronger customizable characteristics, and it can freely adjust its
            *Corresponding authors:     mechanical properties, such as hardness, toughness, and rheological properties. In
            Wei Huang
            (huangw511@163.com)         this review, we review the application of microgels in the field of biomedicine and
            Yiting Lei                  discuss the future development of microgels in 3D bioprinting.
            (leiyit614@163.com)
            Citation: Du C, Huang W, Lei Y,   Keywords: 3D bioprinting; Microgel; Bioink; Tissue engineering
            2023, The application and prospects
            of 3D printable microgel in
            biomedical science and engineering.
            Int J Bioprint, 9(5): 753.
            https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.753  1. Introduction
            Received: January 18, 2023  Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine address tissue loss issues arising from
            Accepted: March 13, 2023
            Published Online: May 16, 2023  disease or injury, and three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has manifested a huge potential
                                        in addressing this issue in recent years [1,2] . 3D bioprinting is a technique conducted by
            Copyright: © 2023 Author(s).
            This is an Open Access article   coding machines with the ideal goal of reproducibly manufacturing high-precision,
            distributed under the terms of the   biologically active customized tissue or organ structures [3,4] . So far, various 3D bioprinting
            Creative Commons Attribution   strategies have been developed to achieve this goal, including stereolithography, inkjet
            License, permitting distribution,
            and reproduction in any medium,   bioprinting, laser-assisted bioprinting, extrusion-based bioprinting, and electrospinning-
            provided the original work is   based bioprinting [5-9] . Different 3D bioprinting strategies have their own advantages and
            properly cited.             disadvantages . For example, the stereolithographic printing strategy is able to reduce
                                                   [10]
            Publisher’s Note: Whioce    shear forces applied on cells during high-resolution (1 μm) bioprinting, thus ensuring
            Publishing remains neutral with   cell viability. However, using this strategy, light is difficult to uniformly pass through the
            regard to jurisdictional claims in                         [6,11]
            published maps and institutional   material, leading to uneven crosslinking  .Inkjet printing strategy is relatively low-cost,
            affiliations.               but it can only produce constructs with a lower cell density, and the printable bioinks that


            Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023)                         85                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.753
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98