Page 460 - v11i4
P. 460

International Journal of Bioprinting                          Tunable GelMA-based bioinks for keloid modeling




            3D-bioprinted constructs. Although higher GelMA content   shear-thinning behavior (Figure 3B–C). This increase in
            can hinder extrusion due to nozzle clogging, this limitation   viscosity reflects alginate’s concentration-dependent chain
            can be overcome by co-formulating with alginate, MC,   entanglement, which improves printability by supporting
            and laponite-RDS to preserve flow characteristics while   controlled extrusion and better shape retention. Higher
            maintaining structural fidelity.                   viscosity also enables faster structural recovery post-
                                                               printing, a key parameter for high-fidelity bioprinting.
            3.2. Alginate as an elasticity enhancer
                                                                  Both formulations displayed solid-like viscoelastic
            In extrusion-based bioprinting, viscosity and shear-  characteristics, with storage modulus (Gʹ) consistently
            thinning behavior are critical for achieving high-resolution   exceeding loss modulus (G˝) over increasing frequencies
            structures while maintaining mechanical stability during   (Figure  3D). Notably, the Gʹ of  the 1% alginate group
            and after deposition. Building on previous studies,   (G5A1M1R1: 50.17 ± 8.59 Pa) was more than twice that
            we investigated the role of alginate as a viscoelasticity   of the 0.5% group (G5A0.5M1R1: 19.50 ± 12.52 Pa),
            enhancer by comparing formulations containing different   suggesting a significant enhancement in network stiffness
            alginate  concentrations:  0.5%  (G5A0.5M1R1)  and  1%   (Figure 3D–E). This finding supports the role of alginate
            (G5A1M1R1),  without  the  use  of  multivalent  cation   as a structural modifier that promotes stronger elastic
            crosslinkers (Figure 3A). As expected, the bioink with   responses within the composite hydrogel. Although the
            higher alginate concentration exhibited a substantial   increase in G˝ was not statistically significant (Figure 3F),
            increase  in  viscosity (~76%)  and  more  pronounced   it followed a similar upward trend.














































            Figure 3. Role of alginate as a viscoelasticity enhancer. (A) Crosslinked hydrogel blend consists of GelMA (5% w/v), alginate (0.5 and 1% w/v), MC (1%
            w/v), and laponite-RDS (1% w/v). Scale bar: 5 mm. (B) Viscosity and (C–G) rheological properties of hydrogel blends with varying alginate concentrations.
            (H–I) Mechanical properties with varying concentration of alginate. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. (J–K) Printability and shape structural fidelity of
            a hydrogel blend. Scale bar: 2.5 mm.


            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                       452                            doi: 10.36922/IJB025160154
   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465